Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 94.77 (2026)
Penalties
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
94.77(1)(1) Any person who violates any provision of this chapter for which a specific penalty is not prescribed, or an order issued or rule promulgated under such a provision, may be fined not more than $1,000 for the first offense and may be fined not less than $500 nor more than $5,000 or imprisoned for not more than 6 months or both for each subsequent offense.
94.77(2)(2) In lieu of the criminal penalty under sub. (1), a person who violates any provision of this chapter for which a specific penalty is not prescribed, or an order issued or rule promulgated under such a provision, may be required to forfeit not less than $200 nor more than $5,000 or, for an offense committed within 5 years of an offense for which a penalty has been assessed under this section, may be required to forfeit not less than $400 nor more than $10,000.
94.77(3)(3) The department may seek an injunction restraining any person from violating this chapter or a rule promulgated under this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2020–2020 · leading case: Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42 (Wis. 2020).
Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42 (Wis. 2020). “21(4) (authorizing criminal penalties for violation of any general or special order issued by DATCP to avert, relieve, or terminate a scarcity of food products or fuel in the state); Wis. Stat. § 94.77 (1)-(2) (authorizing criminal penalties for violation of any orders issued by…”
Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42 (Wis. 2020). “21(4) (authorizing criminal penalties for violation of any general or special order issued by DATCP to avert, relieve, or terminate a scarcity of food products or fuel in the state); Wis. Stat. § 94.77 (1)-(2) (authorizing criminal penalties for violation of any orders issued by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.