Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307 (2026)
Presumptive child support to be followed;
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
deviations by court.
(a) The presumptive child support established by W.S.
20-2-304 shall be rebuttably presumed to be the correct amount
of child support to be awarded in any proceeding to establish or
modify temporary or permanent child support amounts. Every order
or decree providing for the support of a child shall set forth
the presumptive child support amount and shall state whether the
order or decree departs from that amount.
(b) A court may deviate from the presumptive child support
established by W.S. 20-2-304 upon a specific finding that the
application of the presumptive child support would be unjust or
inappropriate in that particular case. In any case where the
court has deviated from the presumptive child support, the
reasons therefor shall be specifically set forth fully in the
order or decree. In determining whether to deviate from the
presumptive child support established by W.S. 20-2-304, the
court shall consider the following factors:
(i) The age of the child;
(ii) The cost of necessary child day care;
(iii) Any special health care and educational needs
of the child;
(iv) The responsibility of either parent for the
support of other children, whether court ordered or otherwise;
(v) The value of services contributed by either
parent;
(vi) Any expenses reasonably related to the mother's
pregnancy and confinement for that child, if the parents were
never married or if the parents were divorced prior to the birth
of the child;
(vii) The cost of transportation of the child to and
from visitation;
(viii) The ability of either or both parents to
furnish health, dental and vision insurance through employment
benefits;
(ix) The amount of time the child spends with each
parent;
(x) Any other necessary expenses for the benefit of
the child;
(xi) Whether either parent is voluntarily unemployed
or underemployed. In such case the child support shall be
computed based upon the potential earning capacity (imputed
income) of the unemployed or underemployed parent. In making
that determination the court shall consider:
(A) Prior employment experience and history;
(B) Educational level and whether additional
education would make the parent more self-sufficient or
significantly increase the parent's income;
(C) The presence of children of the marriage in
the parent's home and its impact on the earnings of that parent;
(D) Availability of employment for which the
parent is qualified;
(E) Prevailing wage rates in the local area;
(F) Special skills or training; and
(G) Whether the parent is realistically able to
earn imputed income.
(xii) Whether or not either parent has violated any
provision of the divorce decree, including visitation
provisions, if deemed relevant by the court; and
(xiii) Other factors deemed relevant by the court.
(c) If the parties fail to agree that the presumptive
child support amount under W.S. 20-2-304 is appropriate, the
court may order the party seeking to deviate from the
presumptive child support amount to pay reasonable attorney fees
and court costs to the other party unless, after hearing the
evidence and considering the factors contained in subsection (b)
of this section, the court deviates from the presumptive support
amount.
(d) Agreements regarding child support may be submitted to
the court. All such agreements shall be accompanied by a
financial affidavit as required by W.S. 20-2-308. The court
shall use the presumed child support amounts to review the
adequacy of child support agreements negotiated by the parties.
If the agreed amount departs from the presumed child support,
the parties shall furnish statements of explanation which shall
be included with the forms and shall be filed with the court.
The court shall review the agreement and inform the parties
whether or not additional or corrected information is needed, or
that the agreement is approved or disapproved. No agreement
which is less than the presumed child support amount shall be
approved if means tested sources of income such as aid under the
personal opportunities with employment responsibilities (POWER)
program, health care benefits under Title XIX of the Social
Security Act, supplemental nutrition assistance program,
supplemental security income (SSI) or other similar benefits are
being paid on behalf of any of the children.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Steele v. Steele, 2005 WY 33 (Wyo. 2005).
Steele v. Steele, 2005 WY 33 (Wyo. 2005). “[5] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (LexisNexis 2003) provides, in pertinent part: (a) The presumptive child support established by W.”
Martin v. Hart, 429 P.3d 56 (Wyo. 2018). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (a) (LexisNexis 2017).”
Benjamin Greer Marquis v. Laura Ann Marquis n/k/a Laura Ann Fausett, 2020 WY 141 (Wyo. 2020). “3 deviation based on substantial contributions and his support of other children pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (b) and denied Father’s request for a “shared responsibility child support obligation” pursuant to Wyo.”
Megan E. Vassilopoulos v. Kyle S. Vassilopoulos, 2024 WY 87 (Wyo. 2024). “” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (b). If the court deviates from the presumptive amount, it then must “specifically set forth fully” the reasons for the deviation.”
Opitz v. Opitz, 2007 WY 207 (Wyo. 2007). “Whether the district court violated Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (b) (Lexis-Nexis 2007) by failing to set forth specific findings for deviating from Wyo *407 ming's presumptive - child guidelines.”
Pasenelli v. Pasenelli, 2002 WY 159 (Wyo. 2002). “The district court applied the standards set out in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (LexisNexis 2001) and determined that he would deviate from presumptive support down to the level of $1,150.”
Shelhamer v. Shelhamer, 2006 WY 83 (Wyo. 2006). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (Lexis-Nexis 2005) provides: § 20-2-307.”
Robert Henry Bruce v. Aubrey Paige Bruce, 2021 WY 38 (Wyo. 2021). “§ 20-2 - 307(b) allows courts to deviate from the § 20-2-304 guidelines if following them “would be unjust or inappropriate,” and lists factors the court shall consider before deviating.”
Laura Shipley v. Francis Smith, 2020 WY 26 (Wyo. 2020). “” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (b) (LexisNexis 2019).”
Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth Bailey, 2024 WY 65 (Wyo. 2024). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (b)(xi) instructs the courts on factors to consider when imputing income: In such case the child support shall be computed based upon the potential earning capacity (imputed income) of the unemployed or underemployed parent.”
Adrienne Janel Edwards v. Andy Edwards, 2020 WY 35 (Wyo. 2020). “]” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (b). [¶13] A court must consider several factors before deviating from the presumptive support amount, such as whether a parent is voluntarily underemployed.”
Long v. Long, 413 P.3d 117 (Wyo. 2018). “The district court's order enforcing the stipulated decree does not state the presumptive child support amount and it does not explain why it deviated from the amount (if it did). Additionally, we cannot rely on the circuit court's order originally establishing this amount.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(a) — 1 case
Stacy R. Dellit v. Joshua M. Tracy, 2015 WY 153 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b) — 8 cases
Steele v. Steele, 2005 WY 33 (Wyo. 2005). “[5] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (LexisNexis 2003) provides, in pertinent part: (a) The presumptive child support established by W.”
Plymale v. Donnelly, 2007 WY 77 (Wyo. 2007).
Robert Henry Bruce v. Aubrey Paige Bruce, 2021 WY 38 (Wyo. 2021). “§ 20-2 - 307(b) allows courts to deviate from the § 20-2-304 guidelines if following them “would be unjust or inappropriate,” and lists factors the court shall consider before deviating.”
Matthew Oliver Lee v. Nancy W. Lee, 2013 WY 76 (Wyo. 2013).
Windham v. Windham, 348 P.3d 836 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(i) — 2 cases
Shelhamer v. Shelhamer, 2006 WY 83 (Wyo. 2006). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (Lexis-Nexis 2005) provides: § 20-2-307.”
Steele v. Neeman, 2009 WY 58 (Wyo. 2009).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(ii) — 1 case
Stacy R. Dellit v. Joshua M. Tracy, 2015 WY 153 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(iv) — 1 case
TSR v. State ex rel. Dep't of Fam. Servs., Child Support Enf't Div., 406 P.3d 729 (Wyo. 2017).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(ix) — 1 case
Stacy R. Dellit v. Joshua M. Tracy, 2015 WY 153 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(v) — 1 case
Shelhamer v. Shelhamer, 2006 WY 83 (Wyo. 2006). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (Lexis-Nexis 2005) provides: § 20-2-307.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(vil) — 1 case
Durham v. Durham, 2003 WY 95 (Wyo. 2003).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(x) — 1 case
Stacy R. Dellit v. Joshua M. Tracy, 2015 WY 153 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(xi) — 1 case
Andrew P. Johnson v. Katie L. Johnson, 2020 WY 18 (Wyo. 2020).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(xi)(C) — 1 case
Daniel L. Stevens v. Kacie J. Stevens, 2014 WY 23 (Wyo. 2014).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(b)(xiii) — 2 cases
Steele v. Steele, 2005 WY 33 (Wyo. 2005). “[5] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (LexisNexis 2003) provides, in pertinent part: (a) The presumptive child support established by W.”
Shelhamer v. Shelhamer, 2006 WY 83 (Wyo. 2006). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307 (Lexis-Nexis 2005) provides: § 20-2-307.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(d) — 1 case
Stacy R. Dellit v. Joshua M. Tracy, 2015 WY 153 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-307(x) — 1 case
Raymond Alexander Verheydt v. Tammi Wai-Ping Verheydt, 2013 WY 25 (Wyo. 2013).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.