The following must be commenced within six years:
(1) Actions for any trespass to person or liberty, such as false imprisonment or assault and battery;
(2) Actions for any trespass to real or personal property;
(3) Actions for the detention or conversion of personal property;
(4) Actions founded on promises in writing not under seal;
(5) Actions for the recovery of money upon a loan, upon a stated or liquidated account or for arrears of rent due upon a parol demise;
(6) Actions for the use and occupation of land;
(7) Motions and other actions against the sureties of any sheriff, coroner, constable, or any public officer and actions against the sureties of executors, administrators, or guardians for any nonfeasance, misfeasance, or malfeasance, whatsoever, of their principal, the time to be computed from the act done or omitted by their principal which fixes the liability of the surety;
(8) Motions and other actions against attorneys-at-law for failure to pay over money of their clients or for neglect or omission of duty; and
(9) Actions upon any simple contract or speciality not specifically enumerated in this section.
(Code 1852, §2477; Code 1867, §2901; Code 1876, §3226; Code 1886, §2615; Code 1896, §2796; Code 1907, §4835; Code 1923, §8944; Code 1940, T. 7, §21.)
Notes of Decisions
Carr v. Int'l Refining & Mfg. Co., 13 So. 3d 947 (Ala. 2009).
· cites it 46× “See § 6-2-34, Ala.Code 1975. However, we declined to reach the question whether a six-year statute of limitations applied to any of the former employees' claims against the new defendants, stating: *951 "That issue .”
Walker v. Capstone Bldg. Corp., 96 So. 3d 77 (Ala. 2012).
· cites it 18× “In McKenzie , this Court concluded that “wanton conduct is the equivalent in law to intentional conduct.”
Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C., 903 So. 2d 82 (Ala. 2004).
· cites it 6× “The Limited New-Home Warranty The warranty provided the Turners with coverage for one year from the date they closed on the purchase of the home.”
Bekken v. Greystone Residential Ass'n, 227 So. 3d 1201 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).
· cites it 17× “2012)(“The statute of limitations of six years set out in Ala. Code § 6-2-34 applies to actions for use and occupation.”
Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson, 137 S. Ct. 1407 (2017).
· cites it 2× “See Ala. Code § 6-2-34 (2014). Johnson, represented by counsel, objected to the claim; Midland did not respond to the objection; and the Bankruptcy Court disallowed the claim.”
Birmingham Hockey Club, Inc. v. NCCI, INC., 827 So. 2d 73 (Ala. 2002).
· cites it 5× “This case was litigated for 4 years at the trial level and produced 13 volumes of record, along with 2 additional boxes of deposition testimony and other filings, yet an allusion to the applicability of a 6 year statute of limitations to BHC's unjust-enrichment claim appears in…”
ROMAR DEV. v. Gulf View Mgmt. Corp., 644 So. 2d 462 (Ala. 1994).
· cites it 7× “It also held that the counterclaim was *465 barred by Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-34(9), the statute of limitations applicable to claims for breach of contract, and awarded Gulf View attorney fees.”
Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc., 240 So. 3d 550 (Ala. 2017).
· cites it 4× “See Ala. Code 1975, § 6-2-34(9) (providing generally for a six-year statute of limitations in an action on a contract).”
Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989).
“, Ala. Code §§ 6-2-34 (1) (1977) (six years “for any trespass to person or liberty, such as false imprisonment or assault and battery”); Ala.”
Labauve v. Olin Corp., 231 F.R.D. 632 (S.D. Ala. 2005).
· cites it 2× “See Ala.Code § 6-2-34(2) (explaining that “[ajctions for any trespass to real or personal property” are subject to six-year limitation period); Motisi v.”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(1) — 34 cases
Carr v. Int'l Refining & Mfg. Co., 13 So. 3d 947 (Ala. 2009).
“See § 6-2-34, Ala.Code 1975. However, we declined to reach the question whether a six-year statute of limitations applied to any of the former employees' claims against the new defendants, stating: *951 "That issue .”
Walker v. Capstone Bldg. Corp., 96 So. 3d 77 (Ala. 2012).
“In McKenzie , this Court concluded that “wanton conduct is the equivalent in law to intentional conduct.”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(2) — 13 cases
Labauve v. Olin Corp., 231 F.R.D. 632 (S.D. Ala. 2005).
“See Ala.Code § 6-2-34(2) (explaining that “[ajctions for any trespass to real or personal property” are subject to six-year limitation period); Motisi v.”
Walker v. Capstone Bldg. Corp., 96 So. 3d 77 (Ala. 2012).
“In McKenzie , this Court concluded that “wanton conduct is the equivalent in law to intentional conduct.”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(3) — 5 cases
Birmingham Hockey Club, Inc. v. NCCI, INC., 827 So. 2d 73 (Ala. 2002).
“This case was litigated for 4 years at the trial level and produced 13 volumes of record, along with 2 additional boxes of deposition testimony and other filings, yet an allusion to the applicability of a 6 year statute of limitations to BHC's unjust-enrichment claim appears in…”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(4) — 11 cases
Bekken v. Greystone Residential Ass'n, 227 So. 3d 1201 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).
“2012)(“The statute of limitations of six years set out in Ala. Code § 6-2-34 applies to actions for use and occupation.”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(5) — 9 cases
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(6) — 2 cases
Bekken v. Greystone Residential Ass'n, 227 So. 3d 1201 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).
“2012)(“The statute of limitations of six years set out in Ala. Code § 6-2-34 applies to actions for use and occupation.”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(8) — 2 cases
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(9) — 36 cases
Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C., 903 So. 2d 82 (Ala. 2004).
“The Limited New-Home Warranty The warranty provided the Turners with coverage for one year from the date they closed on the purchase of the home.”
ROMAR DEV. v. Gulf View Mgmt. Corp., 644 So. 2d 462 (Ala. 1994).
“It also held that the counterclaim was *465 barred by Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-34(9), the statute of limitations applicable to claims for breach of contract, and awarded Gulf View attorney fees.”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(9)(1975) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(a) — 2 cases
Carr v. Int'l Refining & Mfg. Co., 13 So. 3d 947 (Ala. 2009).
“See § 6-2-34, Ala.Code 1975. However, we declined to reach the question whether a six-year statute of limitations applied to any of the former employees' claims against the new defendants, stating: *951 "That issue .”
— Ala. Code § 6-2-34(l) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.