Ala. Code
Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 6-5-504 (2026)

Sections, Clauses, Etc., of Division Inseparable and Nonseverable.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is expressly provided that each section, clause, provision, or portion of this division shall be construed as inseparable and nonseverable from all others, and in the event that any section, clause, provision, or portion of this division shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, the entire division and each section, clause, provision, or portion thereof shall be inoperative and have no effect.

(Acts 1979, No. 79-468, p. 855, §5.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2013 · leading case: Cline v. Ashland, Inc., 970 So. 2d 755 (Ala. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cline v. Ashland, Inc., 970 So. 2d 755 (Ala. 2007). · cites it 3× “§ 6-5-504, Ala.Code 1975. In accordance with this limitation, this Court invalidated the entire Act when it held that a particular section of Act No.”
Griffin v. Unocal Corp., 990 So. 2d 291 (Ala. 2008). · cites it 2× “Because § 6-5-504 provided that in the event any part of §§ 6-5-500 through -504 was declared invalid the entire act would become inoperable, Garrett remained the law.”
Holcomb v. Carraway, 945 So. 2d 1009 (Ala. 2006). “Section 6-5-548, a provision of the Alabama Medical Liability Act, § 6-5-504 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 ("the AMLA"), provides two definitions of a "similarly situated *1013 health care provider," depending upon whether the defendant health-care provider is a "specialist" or a…”
Ridling v. Armstrong World, 627 F. Supp. 1057 (S.D. Ala. 1986). · cites it 3× “Ala.Code § 6-5-504 (1975). See also, Daniel v.”
Hegarty v. Hudson, 123 So. 3d 945 (Ala. 2013). ““Section 6-5-548, a provision of the Alabama Medical Liability Act, § 6-5-504 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (‘the AMLA’), provides two definitions of a ‘similarly situated health care provider,’ depending upon whether the defendant health-care provider is a ‘specialist’ or a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.