Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 47
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9302 (2026)

Law governing perfection and priority of agricultural liens

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

While farm products are located in a jurisdiction, the local law of that jurisdiction governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection and the priority of an agricultural lien on the farm products.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1985–2005 · leading case: Concrete Equip. Co. v. Fox (In Re Vigil Bros. Constr.), 193 B.R. 513 (9th Cir. BAP 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Concrete Equip. Co. v. Fox (In Re Vigil Bros. Constr.), 193 B.R. 513 (9th Cir. BAP 1996). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 47-9302 (Supp.1995). The official comments to the 1962 and 1972 official text of the U.”
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Section 47-9302 requires the filing of a financing statement to perfect a security interest in goods such as the firearms in the instant case, subject to enumerated exceptions not here applicable.”
Sears Consum. Fin. Corp. v. Thunderbird Prods., 802 P.2d 1032 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “§ 9-302(l)(d) [A.R.S. § 47-9302(A)(4) ], a purchase money security interest in a consumer good is perfected automatically without the filing of a financing statement.”
In Re: Tower Air, Inc., Debtor Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Chapter 7 Tr. of Tower Air, Inc. v. Finova Capital Corp., 397 F.3d 191 (3rd Cir. 2005). “Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 47-9302(C) (1999). As 49 U.”
John Deere Co. v. First Interstate Bank of Arizona, N.A., 709 P.2d 890 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “§ 44-3123 (current version at A.R.S. § 47-9302). The formal requisites of a financing statement are as follows: A.”
First Nat'l Bank in Anoka v. Minnesota Util. Contracting, Inc. (In Re Minnesota Util. Contracting, Inc.), 101 B.R. 72 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1989). “001 et seq.; Minn.Stat. § 168A.01 et seq. Accordingly, the Bank’s filing of financing statements in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota did not perfect its security interests in the motor vehicles owned by the debtors in possession.”
Elf Atochem North Am., Inc. v. Celco, Inc., 927 P.2d 355 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “Such steps are specified in §§ 47-9302, 47-9304, 47-9305 and 47-9306.”
In re Vigil Bros. Constr., Inc., 181 B.R. 453 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1995). “A.R.S. § 47-9302(A)(5) provides: A. A financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests except the following: k * * * * # 5.”
In Re Tower Air Inc (3rd Cir. 2005). “Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9302 (C) (1999). As 49 U.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9302(A)(4) — 1 case
Sears Consum. Fin. Corp. v. Thunderbird Prods., 802 P.2d 1032 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). “§ 9-302(l)(d) [A.R.S. § 47-9302(A)(4) ], a purchase money security interest in a consumer good is perfected automatically without the filing of a financing statement.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9302(A)(5) — 2 cases
Concrete Equip. Co. v. Fox (In Re Vigil Bros. Constr.), 193 B.R. 513 (9th Cir. BAP 1996). “A.R.S. § 47-9302 (Supp.1995). The official comments to the 1962 and 1972 official text of the U.”
In re Vigil Bros. Constr., Inc., 181 B.R. 453 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1995). “A.R.S. § 47-9302(A)(5) provides: A. A financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests except the following: k * * * * # 5.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9302(C) — 1 case
In Re: Tower Air, Inc., Debtor Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Chapter 7 Tr. of Tower Air, Inc. v. Finova Capital Corp., 397 F.3d 191 (3rd Cir. 2005). “Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 47-9302(C) (1999). As 49 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.