green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Paige
See State v. Hersey, 78 Conn. App. 141, 167 , 826 A.2d 1183 (“[i]t is axiomatic that the state’s burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt applies to each and every element comprising the offense charged” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 903 , 832 A.2d 65 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fagan
All that is necessary is a general intent that one intend to perform the activities that constitute the violation." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hasfal, 94 Conn.App. 741, 745 , 894 A.2d 372 (2006); State v. Binnette, 86 Conn.App. 491, 497 , 861 A.2d 1197 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 902 , 868 A.2d 745 (2005); accord State v. Hersey, 78 Conn.App. 141, 162 , 826 A.2d 1183 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 903 , 832 A.2d 65 (2003); State v. Charles, 78 Conn.App. 125, 130-31 , 826 A.2d 1172 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 908 , 832 A.2d 73 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Meadows
See, e.g., State v. Hersey , 78 Conn. App. 141 , 161, 826 A.2d 1183 (considering different instructional challenge to charge that defined "harass" as "to trouble, worry or torment" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 903 , 832 A.2d 65 (2003) ; State v. Charles , 78 Conn. App. 125 , 130, 826 A.2d 1172 (same), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 908 , 832 A.2d 73 (2003). 8 Consequently, we are not persuaded that the court erroneously instructed the jury on this element. *302 III The defendant finally claims that his conviction for threatening in the second degree in violation of §…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sinvil
See also State v. Hersey, 78 Conn. App. 141, 157 , 826 A.2d 1183 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 903 , 832 A.2d 65 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
See also State v. Hersey, 78 Conn. App. 141, 157 , 826 A.2d 1183 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 903 , 832 A.2d 65 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FORT TRUMBULL CONSERVANCY, LLC
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEW LONDON
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEW LONDON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 9, 2003.
Scott W. Sawyer, in support of the petition., Jeffrey T. Londregan, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.