green
Positive treatment
18.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino
(5×)
In Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 77 Conn.App. 690 , 825 A.2d 153 (2003), cert. granted 266 Conn. 906 , 832 A.2d 71 (2003), The New York Times applied to the Connecticut Superior Court to "create a new file to address its pending motion seeking to vacate sealing and protective orders entered in twenty-three lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of minors by clergymen." Id. at 156.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino
(5×)
In Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 825 A.2d 153 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003), cert. granted 832 A.2d 71 (Conn. 2003), The New York Times applied to the Connecticut Superior Court to "create a new file to address its pending motion seeking to vacate sealing and protective orders entered in twenty-three lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of minors by clergymen." Id. at 156.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino
(5×)
In Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 77 Conn.App. 690 , 825 A.2d 153 (2003), cert. granted 266 Conn. 906 , 832 A.2d 71 (2003), The New York Times applied to the Connecticut Superior Court to “create a new file to address its pending motion seeking to vacate sealing and protective orders entered in twenty-three lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of minors by clergymen.” Id. at 156.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
(2×)
See Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, supra, 290 F. Sup. 2d 270 (“[t]he court . . . believes that a discussion of the issues in the case of Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 77 Conn. App. 690 , 825 A.2d 153 [certs, granted, 266 Conn. 906 , 907, 832 A.2d 71 , 72 (2003)] is merited because the case is central to the arguments of both parties in the present litigation”). 4 On June 6, 2006, the newspapers and the judicial branch settled the federal litigation and stipulated to its dismissal.
cited
Cited "see"
716 Windsor Street Associates, LLC v. Catholic Charities/Catholic Family Services, Inc.
See Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 77 Conn. App. 690, 720 , 825 A.2d 153 , cert. granted on other grounds, 266 Conn. 906 , 907, 832 A.2d 71 , 72 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
East Haven Builders Supply, Inc. v. Fanton
See Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 77 Conn. App. 690, 720 , 825 A.2d 153 , cert. granted on other grounds, 266 Conn. 906 , 907, 832 A.2d 71 , 72 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MARY PAOLELLA
v.
ESTATE OF WILLIAM PAOLELLA
v.
ESTATE OF WILLIAM PAOLELLA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 2003.
Mary Paolella, pro se, in support of the petition., Peter C. Barrett, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 24084) is denied.
Mary Paolella, pro se, in support of the petition. Peter C. Barrett, in opposition. Decided September 18, 2003