green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Burke v. Commissioner of Correction
See Carey v. Commission of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 180, 182 , 860 A.2d 776 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915 , 866 A.2d 1283 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Little
See Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 180 , 185 n.6, 860 A.2d 776 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915 , 866 A.2d 1283 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Almedina v. Commissioner of Correction
“It is well established that [a] trial court may properly rely on . . . the responses of the [petitioner] at the time [he] responded to the trial court’s plea canvass.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stith, 108 Conn. App. 126, 131 , 946 A.2d 1274 (2008); see also Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 180, 185-86 , 860 A. 2d 776 (2004) (upholding habeas court’s finding that plea knowingly and voluntarily given when, although petitioner claimed he had taken medication on date he entered plea and that this made him confused, there was no evidence that described …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Stith
There has been no offer or proffer of medical documentation to suggest that the defendant was, in fact, on any type of medication on April 26, 2005, other than the bare *131 assertions of the defendant.” 3 “It is well established that [a] trial court may properly rely on . . . the responses of the [defendant] at the time [she] responded to the trial court’s plea canvass . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Monk, 88 Conn. App. 543, 552 , 869 A.2d 1281 (2005); see also Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 180, 185-86 , 860 A.2d 776 (2004) (upholding habeas …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowden v. Commissioner of Correction
See King v. Commissioner of Correction, 73 Conn. App. 600, 603 , 808 A.2d 1166 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 931 , 815 A.2d 133 (2003); see also Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 180 , 185 n.6, 860 A.2d 776 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915 , 866 A.2d 1283 (2005). 7 Similarly, in Adorno v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 179 , 188 n.3, 783 A.2d 1202 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001), we stated that “[t]he habeas court, however, did not discuss in detail those claims, some of which were not even mentioned in the petition for habeas corpus.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RADHA R.M. NARUMANCHI
v.
EDWARD HARRIS
v.
EDWARD HARRIS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 3, 2005.
Radha RM. Narumanchi, pro se, in support of the petition., Jane B. Emons, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 25573) is denied.
KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.