green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
examined
Cited "see"
Silver v. Holtman
(4×)
See Miskimen v. Biber, 85 Conn. App. 615, 626 , 858 A.2d 806 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 916 , 866 A.2d 1287 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benson v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF WESTPORT
(2×)
See Miskimen v. Biber, 85 Conn. App. 615 , *331 617 n.3, 858 A.2d 806 (2004) (private action to enforce zoning regulations), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 916 , 866 A.2d 1287 (2005).
Robert MISKIMEN et al.
v.
Hyman BIBER et al.
v.
Hyman BIBER et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 20, 2005.
Published
Ralph J. Monaco, New London, in support of the petition.
Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, in opposition.
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn.App. 615, 858 A.2d 806 (2004), is denied.