State v. Blackwell, 867 A.2d 838 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
State v. Blackwell, 867 A.2d 838 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cormier v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (connappct, 2008-01-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Cormier v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
“Whether a statute applies retroactively raises a question of statutory construction over which our review is plenary.” Walsh v. Jodoin, 283 Conn. 187, 195 , 925 A.2d 1086 (2007); see Bengtson v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 86 Conn. App. 51, 56 , 859 A.2d 967 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 922 , 867 A.2d 837 (2005).
cited Cited "see" Weinstein v. Weinstein
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Branford v. Van Eck, 86 Conn. App. 441, 446-47 , 861 A.2d 560 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 922 , 867 A.2d 839 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Randolph
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Blackwell, 86 Conn. App. 409, 415-16 , 861 A.2d 548 (2004) (photographic array was not unnecessarily suggestive even though witness recognized three of eight men depicted), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 922 , 867 A.2d 838 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Necaise
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Blackwell, 86 Conn. App. 409, 424-25 , 861 A.2d 548 (2004) (prosecutor’s comment to jury on legal propriety of identification from photographic array proper after defendant made argument that jury should not put any weight on that identification), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 922 , 867 A.2d 838 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. DeCarlo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Blackwell, 86 Conn. App. 409, 417-18 , 861 A.2d 548 , (2004) cert. denied, 272 Conn. 922 , 867 A.2d 838 (2005). “[T]he touchstone for appellate review of claims of prosecutorial misconduct is a determination of whether the defendant was deprived of his right to a fair trial, and this determination must involve the application of the factors set out by [our Supreme Court] in State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Maurice BLACKWELL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 27, 2005.
867 A.2d 838
Published

Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.App. 409, 861 A.2d 548 (2004), is denied.