Brown v. Dep't of Corr., 879 A.2d 892 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Brown v. Dep't of Corr., 879 A.2d 892 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ill v. Manzo-Ill (connappct, 2016-07-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ill v. Manzo-Ill
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
This discussion requires a two part analysis, because the standard for reviewing a trial court's decision on whether a motion is stale under Practice Book § 25-34(e) is the clearly erroneous standard; see Larson v. Larson, 89 Conn.App. 57 , 69, 872 A.2d 912 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 915 , 879 A.2d 892 (2005) ; and the standard for reviewing *826 whether a trial court's dismissal of an action under Practice Book § 14-3 is whether the trial court abused its discretion.
cited Cited "see" Salters v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Salters, 89 Conn. App. 221, 222 , 872 A.2d 933 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 914 , 879 A.2d 893 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Spears v. Elder (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeGennaro v. Tandon, 89 Conn. App. 183, 199-200 , 873 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 914 , 879 A.2d 892 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Santana v. City of Hartford (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. Dept. of Correction, 89 Conn. App. 47, 56 , 871 A.2d 1094 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 914 , 879 A.2d 892 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Aley v. Aley (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Larson v. Larson, 89 Conn. App. 57 , 872 A.2d 912 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 915 , 879 A.2d 892 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward BROWN
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 6, 2005.
879 A.2d 892
Published

Mark S. Loman, Middletown, in support of the petition.

William J. McCullough, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn.App. 47, 871 A.2d 1094 (2005), is denied.