Williams v. Benicorp Ins. Co, 542 U.S. 937 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. Benicorp Ins. Co, 542 U.S. 937 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the purpose of erisa is to provide á uniform regulatory regime over employee benefit plans”
35 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Babino v. Gesualdi (nyed, 2017-10-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Babino v. Gesualdi
E.D.N.Y · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the purpose of erisa is to provide á uniform regulatory regime over employee benefit plans
cited Cited "see" Strich v. United States
D. Colo. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. United States, 343 F.3d 1282, 1296 (10th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2907 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Jody Blake v. Metropolitan Life Ins Co., et
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200, 210-14 , 124 S.Ct. 2488 , *573 2496-98, 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004).
cited Cited "see" IMTEC Corp. v. Moore
E.D. Okla. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. United States, 192 F.3d 951, 957 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2907 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Quaresma v. BC LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY
E.D. Cal. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Conover v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 167 F.Supp.2d 1317, 1319-1322 (N.D.Okla.2001), aff'd, 320 F.3d 1076 (10th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 936 , 124 S.Ct. 2902 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004); Hollaway v. UNUM Life Ins.
cited Cited "see" Burgess v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.
Okla. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ysbrand v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., 2003 OK 17, ¶ 21 , 81 P.3d 618, 627 , cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2907 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004) (citations omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
10th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Conover v. Aetna U.S. Health Care, Inc., 320 F.3d 1076, 1077 (10th Cir.2003), cert. denied — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2902 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004); Garley v. Sandia Corp., 236 F.3d 1200, 1206-07 (10th Cir.2001) (“Whether state law is preempted by federal’ law is a conclusion of law which we ... review de novo.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alva v. Teen Help
10th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
We reaffirm that if a precedent of this Court has direct application in a case, yet appears to rest on reasons rejected in some other line of decisions, the Court of Appeals should follow the case which directly controls, leaving to this Court the prerogative of overruling its own decisions.”) (quotations omitted); see also Conover v. Aetna U.S. Health Care, Inc., 320 F.3d 1076 , 1079 n. 2 (10th Cir.2003) (applying Agostini), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 936 , 124 S.Ct. 2902 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." John T. Martin v. Edward Perez
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rosales-Garcia v. Holland, 322 F.3d 386, 400-01 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 941 , 123 S.Ct. 2607 , 156 L.Ed.2d 627 (2003); see also United States v. Laton, 352 F.3d 286, 290 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2906 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004) (reviewing de novo the determination of whether property affects interstate commerce because it is a mixed question of law and fact).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Benicorp Insurance Co
03-786.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
542 U.S. 937
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)

542 U.S. 937

WILLIAMS
v.
BENICORP INSURANCE CO.

No. 03-786.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 28, 2004.

1

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 223.