Carr v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 768 A.2d 1112 (Pa. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Carr v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 768 A.2d 1112 (Pa. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Johnson v. Johnson, 2016 OK CIV APP 74, 386 P.3d 1049
How cited ↗
Cited for
768 A.2d at 1119 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Johnson v. Johnson, 2016 OK CIV APP 74, 386 P.3d 1049.published 2 cites
    The Wagner Court concluded, therefore, that “the assertion that has legal meaning is one (like the assertion made by [the servicemember]) that withholds consent specifically to the court’s jurisdiction with respect to the retirement pay.”…
Joseph CARR, Appellee
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant
Direct appeal 34 MAP 2000.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 11, 2001.
Published opinion
768 A.2d 1112
2001 Pa. LEXIS 754
Cappy.
Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Kansas (1)

Lead Opinion

[*448] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2001, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County reinstating appellee’s driving privileges on the basis that 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584 is unconstitutional is hereby REVERSED, and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. McCafferty, 563 Pa. 146, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000), and Harrington v. Commonwealth, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.

Concurrence

CAPPY, Justice,

concurring.

The reasons the court of common pleas gave in its corrected memorandum opinion in support of its decision to sustain appellee’s statutory appeal from the suspension of his operating privileges are identical to the reasons the court gave in its memorandum opinion in Crooks v. Commonwealth, Dep’t. of Transp., No. 70 MAP 2000, 2001 WL 359021 (filed April 11, 2001). I, therefore, join the per curiam reversal and remand for the reasons set forth more fully in my concurring and dissenting opinion in Crooks.