Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1969–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See White v. State, 1998 OK CR 69, ¶¶ 3-7 , 973 P.2d 306, 312-13 (Lumpkin, J. 2001See White v. State, 1998 OK CR 69, ¶¶ 3-7 , 973 P.2d 306, 312-13 (Lumpkin, J. | 1 | 1 |
Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.green1 sentence1992Frequent examples are acts dealing with water rights and drainage.” 231 P.2d at 1004 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shaffer v. Jeffery
green
2 sentences2008Shaffer v. Jeffery, 1996 OK 47 , 915 P.2d 910 . ¶ 4 To have a timely § 1901 charge of discrimination, § 1502(A) of the Act requires that a person claiming to be aggrieved by a discriminatory practice must file a written sworn complaint with the Oklahoma Human Rights Commission (OHRC) within 180 days after the alleged discriminatory practice occurs. 2008Shaffer v. Jeffery, 1996 OK 47 , 915 P.2d 910 . ¶ 4 To have a timely § 1901 charge of discrimination, § 1502(A) of the Act requires that a person claiming to be aggrieved by a discriminatory practice must file a written sworn complaint with the Oklahoma Human Rights Commission (OHRC) within 180 days after the alleged discriminatory practice occurs. | 2 | 2007–2008 |
Lively v. State
green
2 sentences1993Lively, 804 P.2d at 70 . 1993Lively, 804 P.2d at 70 . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
McCoy v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2020The unauthorized concession of guilt, even if tactically sound, was a structural error requiring reversal of the convictions under McCoy v. Louisiana , 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018). 2020The unauthorized concession of guilt, even if tactically sound, was a structural error requiring reversal of the convictions under McCoy v. Louisiana , 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Carr v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
green
1 sentence2016Reading the language of 1408(c)(4)(C) in context and consistently with the Act’s scope and object, we believe that Congress intended for the consent requirement in 1408(c)(4)(C) to relate, like the rest of the Act, specifically to a military member’s pension. 768 A.2d at 1118 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
C & L Enterprises Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
green
2 sentences2011The contracts do not provide for application of Oklahoma law, for binding arbitration of disputes or enforcement of arbitration decisions in any state or federal court with jurisdiction, such as were held to waive sovereign immunity in C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 532 U.S. 411 , 121 S.Ct. 1589 , 149 L.Ed.2d 623 (2001). [4] ¶ 19 Plaintiffs ask us to conclude that, because the Business Committee granted authority to Chief Spicer to sign employment contracts with tribal employees for three year terms at their current positions and salaries, those co 2011The contracts do not provide for application of Oklahoma law, for binding arbitration of disputes or enforcement of arbitration decisions in any state or federal court with jurisdiction, such as were held to waive sovereign immunity in C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 532 U.S. 411 , 121 S.Ct. 1589 , 149 L.Ed.2d 623 (2001). [4] ¶ 19 Plaintiffs ask us to conclude that, because the Business Committee granted authority to Chief Spicer to sign employment contracts with tribal employees for three year terms at their current positions and salaries, those co | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Application of Kunneman
green
1 sentence1993The Court of Appeals case cited by the dissent, Application of Kunneman, 501 P.2d 910 (Okla.Ct.App.1972), would not sustain the subsequent consent defense because there was never an unequivocal consent. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences1974It is my opinion that the introduction of the marijuana seized at the home of the defendant, under the consent waiver, did not substantially or reasonably contribute to the jury's determination of the defendant's guilt, since ample evidence of his guilt had been produced, independent of the marijuana seized under the waiver of search, and even had the consent to search the home been involuntarily given, this conviction should be affirmed under the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 and Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 1974It is my opinion that the introduction of the marijuana seized at the home of the defendant, under the consent waiver, did not substantially or reasonably contribute to the jury's determination of the defendant's guilt, since ample evidence of his guilt had been produced, independent of the marijuana seized under the waiver of search, and even had the consent to search the home been involuntarily given, this conviction should be affirmed under the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 and Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Chambers v. Maroney
green
2 sentences1974It is my opinion that the introduction of the marijuana seized at the home of the defendant, under the consent waiver, did not substantially or reasonably contribute to the jury's determination of the defendant's guilt, since ample evidence of his guilt had been produced, independent of the marijuana seized under the waiver of search, and even had the consent to search the home been involuntarily given, this conviction should be affirmed under the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 and Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 1974It is my opinion that the introduction of the marijuana seized at the home of the defendant, under the consent waiver, did not substantially or reasonably contribute to the jury's determination of the defendant's guilt, since ample evidence of his guilt had been produced, independent of the marijuana seized under the waiver of search, and even had the consent to search the home been involuntarily given, this conviction should be affirmed under the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 and Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Yarbrough v. State
green
2 sentences1969In support of defendant’s contention that jeopardy applied, defendant quotes extensively from Yarbrough v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 74 , 210 P.2d 375 . 1969In support of defendant’s contention that jeopardy applied, defendant quotes extensively from Yarbrough v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 74 , 210 P.2d 375 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.