Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
South Dakota v. Nevillegreen2 sentences2020See NHTSA Review 173-175; see also South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553, 554, 563-564 , 103 S. Ct. 916 , 74 L. 2020See NHTSA Review 173-175; see also South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553, 554, 563-564 , 103 S. Ct. 916 , 74 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Missouri v. McNeely
green
2 sentences2020Such laws impose significant consequences when a motorist withdraws consent; typically the motorist's driver's license is immediately suspended or revoked, and most States allow the motorist's refusal to take a BAC test to be used as evidence against him in a subsequent criminal prosecution. [Citations omitted.]" 569 U.S. at 160-61 . 2020Such laws impose significant consequences when a motorist withdraws consent; typically the motorist's driver's license is immediately suspended or revoked, and most States allow the motorist's refusal to take a BAC test to be used as evidence against him in a subsequent criminal prosecution. [Citations omitted.]" 569 U.S. at 160-61 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard
green
2 sentences2020Next, in Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. ___ , 136 S. Ct. 2160, 2184-85 , 195 L. 2020Next, in Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. ___ , 136 S. Ct. 2160, 2184-85 , 195 L. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Fisher v. DeCarvalho
green
2 sentences2019Under Fisher v. DeCarvalho , 298 Kan. 482 , 490, 314 P.3d 214 (2013), and Barnhart v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue , 243 Kan. 209 , 213, 755 P.2d 1337 (1988), substantial compliance with statutory language is what is required, and that level of compliance was met here. 2019Under Fisher v. DeCarvalho , 298 Kan. 482 , 490, 314 P.3d 214 (2013), and Barnhart v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue , 243 Kan. 209 , 213, 755 P.2d 1337 (1988), substantial compliance with statutory language is what is required, and that level of compliance was met here. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Barnhart v. Kansas Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2019Under Fisher v. DeCarvalho , 298 Kan. 482 , 490, 314 P.3d 214 (2013), and Barnhart v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue , 243 Kan. 209 , 213, 755 P.2d 1337 (1988), substantial compliance with statutory language is what is required, and that level of compliance was met here. 2019Under Fisher v. DeCarvalho , 298 Kan. 482 , 490, 314 P.3d 214 (2013), and Barnhart v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue , 243 Kan. 209 , 213, 755 P.2d 1337 (1988), substantial compliance with statutory language is what is required, and that level of compliance was met here. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Podrebarac v. Kansas Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2000Podrebarac v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 15 Kan. 2000Podrebarac v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 15 Kan. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Marek
green
2 sentences1993State v. Marek, 129 Kan. 830, 834 , 284 Pac. 424 (1930).” All the State must do to reserve a question for appeal, then, is lay the same foundation for appeal that a defendant is' required to lay. *767 In the Dahn trial in the district court, counsel for the City voluntarily told the trial court she would not inquire further and made no effort to present the evidence the trial judge stated was necessary to lay a proper foundation for admission of the BAC test. 1993State v. Marek, 129 Kan. 830, 834 , 284 Pac. 424 (1930).” All the State must do to reserve a question for appeal, then, is lay the same foundation for appeal that a defendant is' required to lay. *767 In the Dahn trial in the district court, counsel for the City voluntarily told the trial court she would not inquire further and made no effort to present the evidence the trial judge stated was necessary to lay a proper foundation for admission of the BAC test. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Crozier
green
2 sentences1993In State v. Crozier, 225 Kan. 120, 123-24 , 587 P.2d 331 (1978), we summarized a long line of cases dealing with questions reserved, stating: "The third situation where the prosecution is afforded an appeal after final judgment in a criminal case is upon a question reserved by the prosecution provided for in K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 22-3602(b)(3). 1993In State v. Crozier, 225 Kan. 120, 123-24 , 587 P.2d 331 (1978), we summarized a long line of cases dealing with questions reserved, stating: "The third situation where the prosecution is afforded an appeal after final judgment in a criminal case is upon a question reserved by the prosecution provided for in K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 22-3602(b)(3). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.