5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Luther v. Danner
green
2 sentences2001The approach, moreover, affords protection to the settling party by creating a presumption against wholesale discharge and affords protection to the nonsettling tortfeasors by making it rebuttable.” 268 Kan. at 351-52 . *766 The unnamed party claiming inclusion in the release bears the burden of rebutting the presumption. 268 Kan. at 352 . 2001The approach, moreover, affords protection to the settling party by creating a presumption against wholesale discharge and affords protection to the nonsettling tortfeasors by making it rebuttable.” 268 Kan. at 351-52 . *766 The unnamed party claiming inclusion in the release bears the burden of rebutting the presumption. 268 Kan. at 352 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
In Re the Equalization Proceeding of the Amoco Production Co.
green
1 sentence2021In re Equalization Proceeding of Amoco Production Co., 33 Kan. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Walnut Valley State Bank v. Stovall
green
2 sentences2004The Walnut Valley court also concluded that the burden of rebutting the presumption falls on the person attacking the presumption of equal ownership. 223 Kan. at 463 . 2004The Walnut Valley court also concluded that the burden of rebutting the presumption falls on the person attacking the presumption of equal ownership. 223 Kan. at 463 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
York v. InTrust Bank, N.A.
green
1 sentence2001In York, 265 Kan. at 275 , York brought suit against InTrust for fraud and conspiracy, among other claims arising from a real estate transaction. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Hotchkiss, Administrator v. Werth
yellow
2 sentences1977The defendant cited Hotchkiss, Administrator v. Werth, 207 Kan. 132 , 483 P. 2d 1053 , to support his position. 1977The defendant cited Hotchkiss, Administrator v. Werth, 207 Kan. 132 , 483 P. 2d 1053 , to support his position. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.