10 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Helms v. Tennessee Department of Safetygreen2 sentences2002Helms v. Tennessee Dep’t of Safety, 987 S.W.2d 545, 549 (Tenn. 1999); State v. Blanton, 975 S.W.2d 269, 286 (Tenn. 1998). 1999See Helms v. Tennessee Dep’t of Safety, 987 S.W.2d 545, 549 (Tenn. 1999); State v. Blanton, 975 S.W.2d 269, 286 (Tenn. 1998). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Blantongreen2 sentences2002Helms v. Tennessee Dep’t of Safety, 987 S.W.2d 545, 549 (Tenn. 1999); State v. Blanton, 975 S.W.2d 269, 286 (Tenn. 1998). 1999See Helms v. Tennessee Dep’t of Safety, 987 S.W.2d 545, 549 (Tenn. 1999); State v. Blanton, 975 S.W.2d 269, 286 (Tenn. 1998). | 2 | 2 |
State v. David Willard Phipps, Jr.green2 sentences2000Compare State v. Phipps, 959 S.W.2d 538 (Tenn.1997) (remanding to the trial court for a hearing at which the State would bear the burden of rebutting the presumption of vindictiveness); McKeldin v. State, 516 S.W.2d 82 (Tenn.1974) (remanding for a determination of whether the denial of counsel at preliminary hearing constituted harmless error). 2000Compare State v. Phipps, 959 S.W.2d 538 (Tenn.1997) (remanding to the trial court fór a hearing at which the State would bear the burden of rebutting the presumption of vindictiveness); McKeldin v. State, 516 S.W.2d 82 (Tenn.1974) (remanding for a determination of whether the denial of counsel at preliminary hearing constituted harmless error). | 2 | 2 |
Sanders v. McClanahangreen2 sentences2017“The burden of rebutting this presumption is on the person seeking to establish a will.” Sanders v. McClanahan, 442 S.W.2d 664, 668 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1969) (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 195 S.W.2d 787, 794-95 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1945)); Shrum v. Powell, 604 S.W.2d 869, 872 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980). 1980“The burden of rebutting this presumption is on the person seeking to establish a will.” Sanders v. McClanahan, 59 Tenn.App. at 598 , 442 S.W.2d at 668 (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 29 Tenn.App. at 212-14 , 195 S.W.2d at 794-95 ; 95 C.J.S. | 1 | 3 |
Haven v. Wrinklegreen2 sentences2017“The burden of rebutting this presumption is on the person seeking to establish a will.” Sanders v. McClanahan, 442 S.W.2d 664, 668 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1969) (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 195 S.W.2d 787, 794-95 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1945)); Shrum v. Powell, 604 S.W.2d 869, 872 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980). 1980“The burden of rebutting this presumption is on the person seeking to establish a will.” Sanders v. McClanahan, 59 Tenn.App. at 598 , 442 S.W.2d at 668 (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 29 Tenn.App. at 212-14 , 195 S.W.2d at 794-95 ; 95 C.J.S. | 1 | 2 |
Shrum v. Powellgreen1 sentence2017“The burden of rebutting this presumption is on the person seeking to establish a will.” Sanders v. McClanahan, 442 S.W.2d 664, 668 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1969) (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 195 S.W.2d 787, 794-95 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1945)); Shrum v. Powell, 604 S.W.2d 869, 872 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Azbill v. Azbillgreen1 sentence2012Isbell v. Isbell, 816 S.W.2d 735, 738 (Tenn. 1991); Azbill v. Azbill, 661 S.W.2d 682, 686 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Isbell v. Isbellgreen1 sentence2012Isbell v. Isbell, 816 S.W.2d 735, 738 (Tenn. 1991); Azbill v. Azbill, 661 S.W.2d 682, 686 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKeldin v. State
green
2 sentences2000Compare State v. Phipps, 959 S.W.2d 538 (Tenn.1997) (remanding to the trial court for a hearing at which the State would bear the burden of rebutting the presumption of vindictiveness); McKeldin v. State, 516 S.W.2d 82 (Tenn.1974) (remanding for a determination of whether the denial of counsel at preliminary hearing constituted harmless error). 2000Compare State v. Phipps, 959 S.W.2d 538 (Tenn.1997) (remanding to the trial court fór a hearing at which the State would bear the burden of rebutting the presumption of vindictiveness); McKeldin v. State, 516 S.W.2d 82 (Tenn.1974) (remanding for a determination of whether the denial of counsel at preliminary hearing constituted harmless error). | 2 | 1999–2000 |
Aghili v. Saadatnejadi
green
1 sentence2021The party challenging the validity of the marriage bears the burden of rebutting this presumption by providing the trial court with “‘cogent and convincing’ evidence that the marriage . . . is invalid.” Id. (citing Aghili, 958 S.W.2d at 789 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Emmit v. Emmit
green
1 sentence2021The party challenging the validity of the marriage bears the burden of rebutting this presumption by providing the trial court with “‘cogent and convincing’ evidence that the marriage . . . is invalid.” Id. (citing Aghili, 958 S.W.2d at 789 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Blankenship v. Blankenship
green
1 sentence2000The party seeking to establish ownership by adverse possession bears the burden of rebutting this presumption, and the acts relied upon to prove adverse possession must “be of such a character as to leave no doubt of claim of ownership” and must “give notice to the public of the possession and the claim.” Blankensip v. Blankenship, 658 S.W.2d 125 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.