Your MCP token and copy-and-paste setup for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and the rest are on the install page — filled in with your real credentials while you are signed in.
Delete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant — emailed to you with setup instructions, and always available under that icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Chaneygreen2 sentences2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). 2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). | 2 | 6 |
Fisher v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). 2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). | 2 | 3 |
White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'ngreen1 sentence2023Selective Way insists that the defendants owe contribution with respect to “these joint undertakings,” which, according to Selective Way, resulted in “common costs and obligations.” On this issue, Selective Way’s entire argument amounts to little more than an expression of disagreement. “‘The most fundamental principle of appellate review [] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that that error occurred.’” White v. Pines Cmty. Improvement | 1 | 1 |
Paulino v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See id. at 348 , 924 A.2d 308 . 2019See id. at 348 , 924 A.2d 308 . | 1 | 1 |
Alcazar v. Hayesgreen1 sentence2005See Alcazar, 982 S.W.2d at 854 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'n
green
1 sentence2023App. 13, 50 (2007) (quoting State v. Chaney, 375 Md. 168, 183-84 (2003)), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 403 Md. 13 (2008). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Bender v. Schwartz
green
2 sentences2014Mona, 176 Md.App. at 696 , 934 A.2d 450 (citing Bender v. Schwartz, 172 Md.App. 648, 667 , 917 A.2d 142 (2007)); see also James J. 2014Mona, 176 Md.App. at 696 , 934 A.2d 450 (citing Bender v. Schwartz, 172 Md.App. 648, 667 , 917 A.2d 142 (2007)); see also James J. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Mona v. Mona Electric Group, Inc.
green
2 sentences2014Mona, 176 Md.App. at 696 , 934 A.2d 450 (citing Bender v. Schwartz, 172 Md.App. 648, 667 , 917 A.2d 142 (2007)); see also James J. 2014Mona, 176 Md.App. at 696 , 934 A.2d 450 (citing Bender v. Schwartz, 172 Md.App. 648, 667 , 917 A.2d 142 (2007)); see also James J. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Beales v. State
green
2 sentences2007“We also recognize that trial judges are not obliged to spell out in words every thought and step of logic.... ” Beales v. State, 329 Md. 263, 273 , 619 A.2d 105 (1993). “[T]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that that error occurred.” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d 452 (quotations omitted). 2007“We also recognize that trial judges are not obliged to spell out in words every thought and step of logic.... ” Beales v. State, 329 Md. 263, 273 , 619 A.2d 105 (1993). “[T]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that that error occurred.” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d 452 (quotations omitted). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Herbert v. State
green
2 sentences2004Herbert v. State, 136 Md.App. 458, 493-94 , 766 A.2d 190 (2001). 2004Herbert v. State, 136 Md.App. 458, 493-94 , 766 A.2d 190 (2001). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Milholland v. Whalen
green
1 sentence1990Milholland II, 89 Md. at 216, 43 A. 43 ; Coburn v. Shilling, 138 Md. at 199 , 113 A. 761 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Coburn v. Shilling
green
2 sentences1990Milholland II, 89 Md. at 216, 43 A. 43 ; Coburn v. Shilling, 138 Md. at 199 , 113 A. 761 . 1990Milholland II, 89 Md. at 216, 43 A. 43 ; Coburn v. Shilling, 138 Md. at 199 , 113 A. 761 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.