Adams motion (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

Adams motion in Maryland

5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New Yorkgreen
ny · 1987 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

11
Management Investors v. United Mine Workersgreen
ca6 · 1979 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

11
Binnick v. Avco Financial Services of Nebraska, Inc.green
ned · 1977 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

11
Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc.green
cod · 1964 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

11
Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trustgreen
paed · 1979 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

11
Moore v. Slonimgreen
ctd · 1977 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Unger v. State green
md · 2012
2 sentences

2016In Unger, 427 Md. at 417 , 48 A.3d 242 , the Court of Appeals reversed course, holding that portions of the Adams decision, i.e., the holding that the Court’s interpretation of Article 23 in Stevenson and Montgomery was not a new State constitutional standard, were “wrongly decided” and overruled.

2016In Unger, 427 Md. at 417 , 48 A.3d 242 , the Court of Appeals reversed course, holding that portions of the Adams decision, i.e., the holding that the Court’s interpretation of Article 23 in Stevenson and Montgomery was not a new State constitutional standard, were “wrongly decided” and overruled.

12016–2016
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Awuah green
md · 1997
2 sentences

2009In Attorney Grievance Commission v. Awuah, 346 Md. 420 , 697 A.2d 446 (1997), a case similar to the present one, Awuah failed to maintain a separate trust account for the handling of client funds and maintained in the same account client funds, earned attorney’s fees, and personal and operating expense funds.

2009In Attorney Grievance Commission v. Awuah, 346 Md. 420 , 697 A.2d 446 (1997), a case similar to the present one, Awuah failed to maintain a separate trust account for the handling of client funds and maintained in the same account client funds, earned attorney’s fees, and personal and operating expense funds.

12009–2009
Moore v. Slonim green
ca2 · 1977
1 sentence

1992See, e.g., Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America, 610 F.2d 384, 392 (6th Cir.1979); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F.Supp. 524, 526-27 (D.Conn.), aff'd without opinion, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1977); Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET Trust, 469 F.Supp. 643, 644-45 (E.D.Pa.1979); Binnick v. AVCO Financial Servs. of Nebraska, Inc., 435 F.Supp. 359, 361-62 (D.Neb.1977); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D., Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 741 (D.Colo.1964); Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 195-97 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 91, 92-94 , 505 N.E.2d 601, 603-04 (1987). .Manown’s indeb

11992–1992
Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc. v. S & M CONSTR. CO., INC. green
mdctspecapp · 1976
2 sentences

1986Spivey v. Harris, 64 Md.App. 619 , 498 A.2d 281 (1985); Weston International Corporation v. Woodlawn Supermarkets, Incorporated, 44 Md.App. 390 , 408 A.2d 781 (1979); Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Incorporated v. S & M Construction Company, Incorporated, 33 Md.App. 516 , 365 A.2d 1021 (1976).

1986Spivey v. Harris, 64 Md.App. 619 , 498 A.2d 281 (1985); Weston International Corporation v. Woodlawn Supermarkets, Incorporated, 44 Md.App. 390 , 408 A.2d 781 (1979); Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Incorporated v. S & M Construction Company, Incorporated, 33 Md.App. 516 , 365 A.2d 1021 (1976).

11986–1986
Weston International Corp. v. Woodlawn Supermarkets, Inc. green
mdctspecapp · 1979
2 sentences

1986Spivey v. Harris, 64 Md.App. 619 , 498 A.2d 281 (1985); Weston International Corporation v. Woodlawn Supermarkets, Incorporated, 44 Md.App. 390 , 408 A.2d 781 (1979); Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Incorporated v. S & M Construction Company, Incorporated, 33 Md.App. 516 , 365 A.2d 1021 (1976).

1986Spivey v. Harris, 64 Md.App. 619 , 498 A.2d 281 (1985); Weston International Corporation v. Woodlawn Supermarkets, Incorporated, 44 Md.App. 390 , 408 A.2d 781 (1979); Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Incorporated v. S & M Construction Company, Incorporated, 33 Md.App. 516 , 365 A.2d 1021 (1976).

11986–1986
Spivey v. Harris green
mdctspecapp · 1985
2 sentences

1986Spivey v. Harris, 64 Md.App. 619 , 498 A.2d 281 (1985); Weston International Corporation v. Woodlawn Supermarkets, Incorporated, 44 Md.App. 390 , 408 A.2d 781 (1979); Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Incorporated v. S & M Construction Company, Incorporated, 33 Md.App. 516 , 365 A.2d 1021 (1976).

1986Spivey v. Harris, 64 Md.App. 619 , 498 A.2d 281 (1985); Weston International Corporation v. Woodlawn Supermarkets, Incorporated, 44 Md.App. 390 , 408 A.2d 781 (1979); Kemp-Pontiac-Cadillac, Incorporated v. S & M Construction Company, Incorporated, 33 Md.App. 516 , 365 A.2d 1021 (1976).

11986–1986
New Freedom Corp. v. Brown green
md · 1971
2 sentences

1971Once the irregularity is established, the party who moves to set aside an enrolled judgment must also show that he is acting in good faith, with ordinary diligence, and that he has a meritorious defense, Tasea Investment Corp. v. Dale, 222 Md. 474, 478-79 , 160 A. 2d 920 (1960), so as to satisfy the court in the exercise of a sound discretion that the judgment should be set aside, New Freedom Corp. v. Brown, 260 Md. 383 , 272 A. 2d 401 (1971); Pinkston v. Swift, 231 Md. 346 , 190 A. 2d 533 (1963). *297 From the facts before it, although we are not to be understood as passing on their sufficien

1971Once the irregularity is established, the party who moves to set aside an enrolled judgment must also show that he is acting in good faith, with ordinary diligence, and that he has a meritorious defense, Tasea Investment Corp. v. Dale, 222 Md. 474, 478-79 , 160 A. 2d 920 (1960), so as to satisfy the court in the exercise of a sound discretion that the judgment should be set aside, New Freedom Corp. v. Brown, 260 Md. 383 , 272 A. 2d 401 (1971); Pinkston v. Swift, 231 Md. 346 , 190 A. 2d 533 (1963). *297 From the facts before it, although we are not to be understood as passing on their sufficien

11971–1971
Pinkston v. Swift green
md · 1963
2 sentences

1971Once the irregularity is established, the party who moves to set aside an enrolled judgment must also show that he is acting in good faith, with ordinary diligence, and that he has a meritorious defense, Tasea Investment Corp. v. Dale, 222 Md. 474, 478-79 , 160 A. 2d 920 (1960), so as to satisfy the court in the exercise of a sound discretion that the judgment should be set aside, New Freedom Corp. v. Brown, 260 Md. 383 , 272 A. 2d 401 (1971); Pinkston v. Swift, 231 Md. 346 , 190 A. 2d 533 (1963). *297 From the facts before it, although we are not to be understood as passing on their sufficien

1971Once the irregularity is established, the party who moves to set aside an enrolled judgment must also show that he is acting in good faith, with ordinary diligence, and that he has a meritorious defense, Tasea Investment Corp. v. Dale, 222 Md. 474, 478-79 , 160 A. 2d 920 (1960), so as to satisfy the court in the exercise of a sound discretion that the judgment should be set aside, New Freedom Corp. v. Brown, 260 Md. 383 , 272 A. 2d 401 (1971); Pinkston v. Swift, 231 Md. 346 , 190 A. 2d 533 (1963). *297 From the facts before it, although we are not to be understood as passing on their sufficien

11971–1971
Tasea Investment Corp. v. Dale green
md · 1960
2 sentences

1971Once the irregularity is established, the party who moves to set aside an enrolled judgment must also show that he is acting in good faith, with ordinary diligence, and that he has a meritorious defense, Tasea Investment Corp. v. Dale, 222 Md. 474, 478-79 , 160 A. 2d 920 (1960), so as to satisfy the court in the exercise of a sound discretion that the judgment should be set aside, New Freedom Corp. v. Brown, 260 Md. 383 , 272 A. 2d 401 (1971); Pinkston v. Swift, 231 Md. 346 , 190 A. 2d 533 (1963). *297 From the facts before it, although we are not to be understood as passing on their sufficien

1971Once the irregularity is established, the party who moves to set aside an enrolled judgment must also show that he is acting in good faith, with ordinary diligence, and that he has a meritorious defense, Tasea Investment Corp. v. Dale, 222 Md. 474, 478-79 , 160 A. 2d 920 (1960), so as to satisfy the court in the exercise of a sound discretion that the judgment should be set aside, New Freedom Corp. v. Brown, 260 Md. 383 , 272 A. 2d 401 (1971); Pinkston v. Swift, 231 Md. 346 , 190 A. 2d 533 (1963). *297 From the facts before it, although we are not to be understood as passing on their sufficien

11971–1971

Where else courts name it

TX 37 (1922–2025) OH 19 (2000–2025) FL 18 (1985–2019) LA 15 (1977–2022) CA 15 (1979–2026) GA 14 (1978–2026) PA 14 (1980–2025) IN 12 (1984–2016) AL 12 (1977–2016) IL 10 (1984–2021) DC 9 (1992–2015) MS 9 (1986–2023) KS 9 (1989–2021) MI 9 (1979–2022) NJ 6 (1987–2020) WA 6 (2000–2018) NY 6 (1983–2017) WI 6 (1998–2026) MO 6 (1992–2019) MD 5 (1971–2016) MA 5 (1979–2016) VA 4 (1974–2026) KY 4 (2017–2023) TN 4 (1997–2010) SC 4 (1991–2014) HI 3 (2009–2013) DE 3 (1986–2024) IA 3 (2014–2024) AK 3 (1980–2019) NC 3 (1989–1994) OK 2 (1977–1992) AR 2 (2009–2013) AZ 2 (1985–2000) MT 2 (1997–2015) ID 2 (2002–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check