Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Housing Authority of the City of South Bendgreen2 sentences2012See id. (“Jones has been provided a full opportunity to present his defenses . . . , first through the trial court, and now before us on appeal. 2012See id. ("Jones has been provided a full opportunity to present his defenses ..., first through the trial court, and now before us on appeal. | 2 | 2 |
Keyser v. Stategreen2 sentences2009Id. at 778-79 (quoting Keyser v. State, 160 Ind.App. 566, 569 , 312 N.E.2d 922, 924 (1974)). 2009Id. at 778-79 (quoting Keyser v. State, 160 Ind.App. 566, 569 , 312 N.E.2d 922, 924 (1974)). | 1 | 2 |
Phillip T. Billingsley v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2016See id. | 1 | 1 |
Boyd v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Boyd v. State, 889 N.E.2d 321, 324 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Stuff v. Simmonsgreen1 sentence2012Stuff v. Simmons, 838 N.E.2d 1096, 1099 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied. 1 We also decline to find that Adams’ motion lacked the requisite factual support. 6 When the validity of a statute is challenged, we begin with a presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences2009Ultimately, Adams's defense turned on whether he had a "reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to prevent serious bodily injury." Taylor v. State, 710 N.E.2d 921, 924 (Ind.1999); cf. Ind.Code § 35-41-3-2(a) (2004). 2009Ultimately, Adams's defense turned on whether he had a "reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to prevent serious bodily injury." Taylor v. State, 710 N.E.2d 921, 924 (Ind.1999); cf. Ind.Code § 35-41-3-2(a) (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Coca-Cola Co. v. Babyback's International, Inc.green1 sentence2005"Whether a writing satisfies the statute of frauds is a question of law for the court." Coca-Cola Co. v. Babyback's Intern., Inc., 806 N.E.2d 37, 42 (Ind.Ct.App.2004), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Aubrey Dennis Adams, Jr. v. Louie Wainwright, Jim Smithgreen2 sentences1990The district court had concluded that Adams' claim did not " 'derive any merit from the Caldwell decision' because the trial judge and not the jury, is the sole sentencer in Florida." 804 F.2d at 1528-29 . 1990The district court had concluded that Adams' claim did not "`derive any merit from the Caldwell decision' because the trial judge and not the jury, is the sole sentencer in Florida." 804 F.2d at 1528-29 . | 1 | 1 |
Kreitlein v. Fergergreen2 sentences1984See Kreitlein v. Ferger, 1915, 238 U.S. 21 , 35 S.Ct. 685 , 59 L.Ed. 1184 .” (Other citations omitted.) Gomez scheduled Adams’ claim for $60,000 on Schedule A-3 which accompanied his amended bankruptcy petition. 1984See Kreitlein v. Ferger, 1915, 238 U.S. 21 , 35 S.Ct. 685 , 59 L.Ed. 1184 .” (Other citations omitted.) Gomez scheduled Adams’ claim for $60,000 on Schedule A-3 which accompanied his amended bankruptcy petition. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. State
green
2 sentences2016Id. [21] We conclude that whatever merit Adams’s claim has lies beyond the record he has submitted to us and beyond what a court may consult when reviewing a motion to correct an erroneous sentence. 2016Id. [21] We conclude that whatever merit Adams’s claim has lies beyond the record he has submitted to us and beyond what a court may consult when reviewing a motion to correct an erroneous sentence. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Charles D. Howard v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2015See App. R. 46(A)(8)(a); Howard, 32 N.E.3d at 1195 n.12 (failure to provide cogent argument in support of claim of error waives appellate review of such claim). 2015See App. R. 46(A)(8)(a); Howard, 32 N.E.3d at 1195 n. 12 (failure to provide cogent argument in support of claim of error waives appellate review of such claim).: -, | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Adams v. State
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 778-79 (quoting Keyser v. State, 160 Ind.App. 566, 569 , 312 N.E.2d 922, 924 (1974)). 2009Id. at 778-79 (quoting Keyser v. State, 160 Ind.App. 566, 569 , 312 N.E.2d 922, 924 (1974)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Bubacz v. Kirk
neutral
2 sentences2007Thirty years later, we reiterated the Adams rule in Bubacz v. Kirk, 91 Ind.App. 479 , 171 N.E. 492 (1930) where, presented with a dispute over real estate, we delved into the historical ownership of the land. 2007Thirty years later, we reiterated the Adams rule in Bubacz v. Kirk, 91 Ind.App. 479 , 171 N.E. 492 (1930) where, presented with a dispute over real estate, we delved into the historical ownership of the land. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.