5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Karon Jackson v. VHS Detroit Receiving Hospitalgreen2 sentences2023As the Sixth Circuit later explained, “the Mitchell factors do not require a plaintiff to demonstrate an exact correlation with the employee receiving more favorable treatment in order for the two to be considered similarly situated.” Jackson v VHS Detroit Receiving Hosp, Inc, 814 F3d 769, 777 (CA 6, 2016) (cleaned up). 2023As the Sixth Circuit later explained, “the Mitchell factors do not require a plaintiff to demonstrate an exact correlation with the employee receiving more favorable treatment in order for the two to be considered similarly situated.” Jackson v VHS Detroit Receiving Hosp, Inc, 814 F3d 769, 777 (CA 6, 2016) (cleaned up). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Cartergreen2 sentences2021See People v Carter, 462 Mich 206, 215 ; 612 NW2d 144 (2000). 2021See People v Carter, 462 Mich 206, 215 ; 612 NW2d 144 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Charles R. Chadwick v. Calvin E. Green, Superintendent, Wayne Correctional Institution, Odum, Georgiagreen1 sentence1997A long line of federal and state precedent holds that Sixth Amendment rights are violated when the defendant is denied counsel at a critical stage in the proceedings. " Cronic and Strickland make clear that where actual or constructive denial of assistance of counsel occurs a per se rule of prejudice applies.'" Crutchfield v. Wainwright, 803 F.2d 1103,1108 (C.A.11,1986), quoting Chadwick v. Green, 740 F.2d 897, 900, n. 3 (C.A.11,1984). [4] *621 In Geders, supra, the Court held that a trial court's order preventing the defendant in a federal criminal prosecution from consulting his counsel "abo | 1 | 1 |
Barney Earl Crutchfield v. Louie L. Wainwright, Jim Smithgreen1 sentence1997A long line of federal and state precedent holds that Sixth Amendment rights are violated when the defendant is denied counsel at a critical stage in the proceedings. " Cronic and Strickland make clear that where actual or constructive denial of assistance of counsel occurs a per se rule of prejudice applies.'" Crutchfield v. Wainwright, 803 F.2d 1103,1108 (C.A.11,1986), quoting Chadwick v. Green, 740 F.2d 897, 900, n. 3 (C.A.11,1984). [4] *621 In Geders, supra, the Court held that a trial court's order preventing the defendant in a federal criminal prosecution from consulting his counsel "abo | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Karbel v. Comerica Bank
green
1 sentence2021Karbel, 247 Mich App at 95 . 2 We note that with respect to Mitchell’s challenge of the initial appointment of Ruiz as trustee, the argument was waived considering that Mitchell specifically agreed to Ruiz’s appointment. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Kimble
green
1 sentence2020Because defense counsel objected to the prosecutor’s question on a different ground, Mitchell’s challenge is unpreserved, see Kimble, 470 Mich at 309 , and we review for plain error affecting substantial rights, see Carines, 460 Mich at 763-764 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Carines
green
1 sentence2020Because defense counsel objected to the prosecutor’s question on a different ground, Mitchell’s challenge is unpreserved, see Kimble, 470 Mich at 309 , and we review for plain error affecting substantial rights, see Carines, 460 Mich at 763-764 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1976Defendant relies upon People v Johnson, 4 Mich App 205 ; 144 NW2d 646 (1966), and the finding in that case that the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof because the Court found "no evidence in the record which supports a conclusion that negatives every reasonable theory consistent with the defendant’s innocence”. 1976Defendant relies upon People v Johnson, 4 Mich App 205 ; 144 NW2d 646 (1966), and the finding in that case that the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof because the Court found "no evidence in the record which supports a conclusion that negatives every reasonable theory consistent with the defendant’s innocence”. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.