Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Alaskagreen2 sentences1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. O'CAIN
green
1 sentence2020If the reliability of DOC’s information was challenged, Officer Conrath’s good faith would not relieve the State of its burden to prove that DOC had sufficient information of a valid arrest warrant and thereby probable cause, see id., but that was not the nature of Mr. Mitchell’s challenge. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Ladson
green
1 sentence2008Review denied at 165 Wn.2d 1022 (2009). 138 Wn.2d 343 , 979 P.2d 833 (1999). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Ladson
green
1 sentence2008Review denied at 165 Wn.2d 1022 (2009). 138 Wn.2d 343 , 979 P.2d 833 (1999). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Uphoff
neutral
1 sentence2008Review denied at 165 Wn.2d 1022 (2009). 138 Wn.2d 343 , 979 P.2d 833 (1999). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Klinker
green
2 sentences2006PEMCO argues that Mitchell filed his own lawsuit—a separate case from the previous one—on January 9, 2003 and, thus, the appropriate statutory period in this case can only run from January 9, 2000. ¶28 Mitchell relies on State v. Klinker, 85 Wn.2d 509 , 537 P.2d 268 (1975), for the proposition that dismissal of a motion without prejudice means that a subsequent filing relates back to the original filing date. 2006Klinker, 85 Wn.2d at 524 n.8. ¶29 Here, Mitchell’s motion to intervene in Frye’s suit was dismissed without prejudice, and although the dismissal without prejudice would have permitted Mitchell to move to intervene again, Mitchell subsequently brought his own class-action lawsuit. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Kwan Fai Mak
green
2 sentences1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Harrington v. California
red
2 sentences1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Stephens
green
2 sentences1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Seymour v. United States
green
1 sentence1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Halter v. Secretary of the Treasury
green
2 sentences1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Walker v. Illinois
green
1 sentence1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Guloy
green
2 sentences1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 1991Obviously if Mr. Hankerson's motion had been granted, Mr. Mitchell's motion would have been moot. [19] See ER 609(a). [20] 415 U.S. 308 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 , 94 S.Ct. 1105 (1974). [21] 105 Wn.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). [22] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985) (citing Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 251-52 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 21 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 , reh'g denied, 386 U.S. 987 (1967)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 (1986). [23] State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2 | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Battalla v. State
green
2 sentences1976The Mitchell rule survived in New York until 1961 when it was overruled in Battalla v. State, 10 N.Y.2d 237 , 176 N.E.2d 729 (1961). 1976The Mitchell rule survived in New York until 1961 when it was overruled in Battalla v. State, 10 N.Y.2d 237 , 176 N.E.2d 729 (1961). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Hill v. Kimball
green
2 sentences1976An opposite view was taken in Hill v. Kimball, 76 Tex. 210 , 13 S.W. 59 (1890), where an assault in the presence of the plaintiff caused her fright which produced a miscarriage. 1976An opposite view was taken in Hill v. Kimball, 76 Tex. 210 , 13 S.W. 59 (1890), where an assault in the presence of the plaintiff caused her fright which produced a miscarriage. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.