Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schriro v. Summerlingreen2 sentences2014APPLICATION It is uncontested that Miller is a new rule, and we agree with the majority’s conclusion that “Miller imposed a hitherto-absent obligation on state and lower federal 36 Id. at 353 (emphasis omitted). 37 Id. at 354 . 38 Whorton v Bockting, 549 US 406, 417-418 ; 127 S Ct 1173 ; 167 L Ed 2d 1 (2007), citing Summerlin, 542 US at 356 . 39 Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 ; 83 S Ct 792 ; 9 L Ed 2d 799 (1963). 40 Whorton, 549 US at 419 (stating that Gideon was a watershed rule of constitutional procedure within the meaning of Teague). 11 courts to conduct individualized sentencing hearings 2014APPLICATION It is uncontested that Miller is a new rule, and we agree with the majority’s conclusion that “Miller imposed a hitherto-absent obligation on state and lower federal 36 Id. at 353 (emphasis omitted). 37 Id. at 354 . 38 Whorton v Bockting, 549 US 406, 417-418 ; 127 S Ct 1173 ; 167 L Ed 2d 1 (2007), citing Summerlin, 542 US at 356 . 39 Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 ; 83 S Ct 792 ; 9 L Ed 2d 799 (1963). 40 Whorton, 549 US at 419 (stating that Gideon was a watershed rule of constitutional procedure within the meaning of Teague). 11 courts to conduct individualized sentencing hearings | 3 | 3 |
Whorton v. Bocktinggreen2 sentences2014Whorton, 549 US at 419 (stating that Gideon was a watershed rule of constitutional procedure within the meaning of Teague). 2014APPLICATION It is uncontested that Miller is a new rule, and we agree with the majority’s conclusion that “Miller imposed a hitherto-absent obligation on state and lower federal 36 Id. at 353 (emphasis omitted). 37 Id. at 354 . 38 Whorton v Bockting, 549 US 406, 417-418 ; 127 S Ct 1173 ; 167 L Ed 2d 1 (2007), citing Summerlin, 542 US at 356 . 39 Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 ; 83 S Ct 792 ; 9 L Ed 2d 799 (1963). 40 Whorton, 549 US at 419 (stating that Gideon was a watershed rule of constitutional procedure within the meaning of Teague). 11 courts to conduct individualized sentencing hearings | 3 | 3 |
People v. Barnesgreen2 sentences2024See People v Barnes, 502 Mich 265, 268-269, 273-274 ; 917 NW2d 577 (2018). 3 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez, 372 US 144, 168-169 ; 83 S Ct 554 ; 9 L Ed2d 644 (1963) (articulating seven factors relevant for determining if “an Act of Congress is penal or regulatory in character”). 4 Smith v Doe, 538 US 84, 97 ; 123 S Ct 1140 ; 155 L Ed2d 164 (2003) (articulating five of the factors articulated in Mendoza-Martinez that were relevant to determining whether Alaska’s sex offender registration law was, in effect, penal or regulatory). -5- A. FEDERAL RETROACTIVITY Federal law does not mandate retroactive 2024See People v Barnes, 502 Mich 265, 268-269, 273-274 ; 917 NW2d 577 (2018). 3 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez, 372 US 144, 168-169 ; 83 S Ct 554 ; 9 L Ed2d 644 (1963) (articulating seven factors relevant for determining if “an Act of Congress is penal or regulatory in character”). 4 Smith v Doe, 538 US 84, 97 ; 123 S Ct 1140 ; 155 L Ed2d 164 (2003) (articulating five of the factors articulated in Mendoza-Martinez that were relevant to determining whether Alaska’s sex offender registration law was, in effect, penal or regulatory). -5- A. FEDERAL RETROACTIVITY Federal law does not mandate retroactive | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gideon v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences2014APPLICATION It is uncontested that Miller is a new rule, and we agree with the majority’s conclusion that “Miller imposed a hitherto-absent obligation on state and lower federal 36 Id. at 353 (emphasis omitted). 37 Id. at 354 . 38 Whorton v Bockting, 549 US 406, 417-418 ; 127 S Ct 1173 ; 167 L Ed 2d 1 (2007), citing Summerlin, 542 US at 356 . 39 Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 ; 83 S Ct 792 ; 9 L Ed 2d 799 (1963). 40 Whorton, 549 US at 419 (stating that Gideon was a watershed rule of constitutional procedure within the meaning of Teague). 11 courts to conduct individualized sentencing hearings 2014APPLICATION It is uncontested that Miller is a new rule, and we agree with the majority’s conclusion that “Miller imposed a hitherto-absent obligation on state and lower federal 36 Id. at 353 (emphasis omitted). 37 Id. at 354 . 38 Whorton v Bockting, 549 US 406, 417-418 ; 127 S Ct 1173 ; 167 L Ed 2d 1 (2007), citing Summerlin, 542 US at 356 . 39 Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 ; 83 S Ct 792 ; 9 L Ed 2d 799 (1963). 40 Whorton, 549 US at 419 (stating that Gideon was a watershed rule of constitutional procedure within the meaning of Teague). 11 courts to conduct individualized sentencing hearings | 3 | 2014–2014 |
Montgomery v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2026The watershed exception is moribund.” Id. at 272 . 14 Louisiana, 577 US 190 , 206; 136 S Ct 718 ; 193 L Ed 2d 599 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2026The watershed exception is moribund.” Id. at 272 . 14 Louisiana, 577 US 190 , 206; 136 S Ct 718 ; 193 L Ed 2d 599 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Montgomery v. Louisiana
green
1 sentence2026The watershed exception is moribund.” Id. at 272 . 14 Louisiana, 577 US 190 , 206; 136 S Ct 718 ; 193 L Ed 2d 599 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Edwards v. Vannoy
green
1 sentence2026The watershed exception is moribund.” Id. at 272 . 14 Louisiana, 577 US 190 , 206; 136 S Ct 718 ; 193 L Ed 2d 599 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Smith v. Doe
green
2 sentences2024See People v Barnes, 502 Mich 265, 268-269, 273-274 ; 917 NW2d 577 (2018). 3 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez, 372 US 144, 168-169 ; 83 S Ct 554 ; 9 L Ed2d 644 (1963) (articulating seven factors relevant for determining if “an Act of Congress is penal or regulatory in character”). 4 Smith v Doe, 538 US 84, 97 ; 123 S Ct 1140 ; 155 L Ed2d 164 (2003) (articulating five of the factors articulated in Mendoza-Martinez that were relevant to determining whether Alaska’s sex offender registration law was, in effect, penal or regulatory). -5- A. FEDERAL RETROACTIVITY Federal law does not mandate retroactive 2024See People v Barnes, 502 Mich 265, 268-269, 273-274 ; 917 NW2d 577 (2018). 3 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez, 372 US 144, 168-169 ; 83 S Ct 554 ; 9 L Ed2d 644 (1963) (articulating seven factors relevant for determining if “an Act of Congress is penal or regulatory in character”). 4 Smith v Doe, 538 US 84, 97 ; 123 S Ct 1140 ; 155 L Ed2d 164 (2003) (articulating five of the factors articulated in Mendoza-Martinez that were relevant to determining whether Alaska’s sex offender registration law was, in effect, penal or regulatory). -5- A. FEDERAL RETROACTIVITY Federal law does not mandate retroactive | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Maxson
green
1 sentence2024The first step in the federal analysis of retroactivity is whether the decision created a “new rule.” Maxson, 482 Mich at 388 , citing Teague v Lane, 489 US 288 ; 109 S Ct 1060 ; 103 L Ed2d 334 (1989). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Teague v. Lane
green
2 sentences2024The first step in the federal analysis of retroactivity is whether the decision created a “new rule.” Maxson, 482 Mich at 388 , citing Teague v Lane, 489 US 288 ; 109 S Ct 1060 ; 103 L Ed2d 334 (1989). 2024The first step in the federal analysis of retroactivity is whether the decision created a “new rule.” Maxson, 482 Mich at 388 , citing Teague v Lane, 489 US 288 ; 109 S Ct 1060 ; 103 L Ed2d 334 (1989). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
green
2 sentences2024See People v Barnes, 502 Mich 265, 268-269, 273-274 ; 917 NW2d 577 (2018). 3 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez, 372 US 144, 168-169 ; 83 S Ct 554 ; 9 L Ed2d 644 (1963) (articulating seven factors relevant for determining if “an Act of Congress is penal or regulatory in character”). 4 Smith v Doe, 538 US 84, 97 ; 123 S Ct 1140 ; 155 L Ed2d 164 (2003) (articulating five of the factors articulated in Mendoza-Martinez that were relevant to determining whether Alaska’s sex offender registration law was, in effect, penal or regulatory). -5- A. FEDERAL RETROACTIVITY Federal law does not mandate retroactive 2024See People v Barnes, 502 Mich 265, 268-269, 273-274 ; 917 NW2d 577 (2018). 3 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez, 372 US 144, 168-169 ; 83 S Ct 554 ; 9 L Ed2d 644 (1963) (articulating seven factors relevant for determining if “an Act of Congress is penal or regulatory in character”). 4 Smith v Doe, 538 US 84, 97 ; 123 S Ct 1140 ; 155 L Ed2d 164 (2003) (articulating five of the factors articulated in Mendoza-Martinez that were relevant to determining whether Alaska’s sex offender registration law was, in effect, penal or regulatory). -5- A. FEDERAL RETROACTIVITY Federal law does not mandate retroactive | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.