permission rule in Minnesota

5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.green minn · 1983 · cited in 4 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1984–2003 2 sentences 2003Drechsler, Annotation, Automobile Liability Insurance: Permission or Consent to Employee's Use of Car Within the Meaning of Omnibus Coverage Clause, 5 A.L.R.2d 600 , 622 (1949). 585 In Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., we adopted the initial permission rule. 332 N.W.2d 160, 165 (Minn.1983) (noting that the policy behind Minn.Stat. § 170.54 [the Safety Responsibility Act] is to ensure "persons injured by the negligent operation of automobiles `an approximate certainty' of an effective recovery" when liability would not otherwise exist) (citation omitted). 2003*In Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., we adopted the initial permission rule. 332 N.W.2d 160, 165 (Minn.1983) (noting that the policy behind Minn.Stat. § 170.54 [the Safety Responsibility Act] is to ensure “persons injured by the negligent operation of automobiles ‘an approximate certainty’ of an effective recovery” when liability would not otherwise exist) (citation omitted).	2	4
Schumacher v. Heiggreen minnctapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997Schumacher v. Heig, 454 N.W.2d 446, 448 (Minn.App.1990). [3] We conclude that the initial permission rule is not applicable to situations involving ATVs. 1997Schumacher v. Heig, 454 N.W.2d 446, 448 (Minn.App.1990). 3 We conclude that the initial permission rule is not applicable to situations involving ATVs.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
Dickinson v. Great American Indemnity Co. green mass · 1937 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Government Employees Insurance v. Johnson green nh · 1978 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Fisher green nev · 1972 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Hmelevsky Ex Rel. Ridgeway green idaho · 1975 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones green illappct · 1977 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. green illappct · 1956 2 sentences 1983Today, the initial permission rule is said to be supported by the “weight of authority.” Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 11 Ill.App.2d 503 , 137 N.E.2d 855 (1956). 1983Today, the initial permission rule is said to be supported by the “weight of authority.” Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 11 Ill.App.2d 503 , 137 N.E.2d 855 (1956).	1	1983–1983
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah green calctapp · 1979 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Ryan v. Western Pacific Insurance green or · 1965 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Carey v. Ory green lactapp · 1982 1 sentence 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli green haw · 1968 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Lewandowski v. Nat'l Grange Mut. Ins. Co. green njsuperctappdiv · 1977 2 sentences 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983
Maryland Casualty Company v. Hassell green kyctapphigh · 1967 1 sentence 1983The initial permission rule has also received the endorsement of courts in the following states: California: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Abdullah, 94 Cal.App.3d 81 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1979); Hawaii: Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli, 50 Haw. 212 , 437 P.2d 99 (1968); Idaho: Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho v. Hmelevsky, 97 Idaho 46 , 539 P.2d 598 (1975); Illinois: Coronet Insurance Co. v. Jones, 45 Ill.App.3d 232 , 3 Ill.Dec. 909 , 359 N.E.2d 768 (1977); Kentucky: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hassell, 426 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. App.1967); Louisiana: Carey v. Ory, 421 So.2d 1003 (La.Ap	1	1983–1983

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MN § Minn. Stat. § 170.54 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NJ 21 (1960–2019) IL 19 (1915–2023) NY 16 (1916–2025) LA 11 (1939–2000) CA 8 (1976–2024) OH 6 (1986–2007) MO 6 (1970–2003) WI 5 (1961–2010) MN 5 (1983–2003) CO 5 (1995–1999) MS 4 (1968–1999) NE 4 (1971–2001) TX 4 (2003–2021) MT 2 (1987–2008) MI 2 (1910–2023) MD 2 (1991–2004) VT 2 (1964–2000) CT 2 (2000–2024) WA 2 (2008–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check