driving privilege in New Jersey

1978Ct. 1960) (one external tuning fork and the driving of a test car with an uncalibrated speedometer through the machine's "zone of influence"); People v. Lynch, 61 Misc. 2d 115, 117 , 304 N.Y.S. 2d 985 (Cty.

1975Ct. 1960) (one external tuning fork, and the driving of a test car with an uncalibrated speedometer through the radar machine's "zone of influence"); People v. Lynch, 61 Misc. 2d 117 , 304 N.Y.S. 2d 985 (Cty.

2003The second includes claims which are already pending or are about to be instituted in another forum whose jurisdiction thereover is superior or prior. [ Ibid. ] The trial court apparently conceived that Berkeley Heights' plan to acquire the Stanford Drive site by eminent domain would fall within the second category of enjoinable litigation because, in granting Salvigsen's motion to enjoin continuation of the action, it stated: When [this] court [made] its ... decision denying [Berkeley Heights'] request to delete the Stanford Drive site from its compliance plan, one of the driving factors was

1998In determining whether that statute should be construed to preclude the imposition of consecutive suspensions of driving privileges on an offender being sentenced on the same date for multiple drug offenses, this Court in T.B., supra, 134 N.J. at 383 , 634 A.2d 473 , found that “[t]he arguments in favor of either outcome are evenly balanced.” We then determined that because sufficient flexibility exists in the range of the suspensions the court may impose, the concurrent suspension of driving privileges more closely reflects the Legislature’s intent concerning this sanction and will best advan

1998In determining whether that statute should be construed to preclude the imposition of consecutive suspensions of driving privileges on an offender being sentenced on the same date for multiple drug offenses, this Court in T.B., supra, 134 N.J. at 383 , 634 A.2d 473 , found that “[t]he arguments in favor of either outcome are evenly balanced.” We then determined that because sufficient flexibility exists in the range of the suspensions the court may impose, the concurrent suspension of driving privileges more closely reflects the Legislature’s intent concerning this sanction and will best advan

1984While the revocation of one's driving privilege is "a consequence of magnitude" that is serious enough to call into play the right to counsel, Rodriguez v. Rosenblatt, 58 N.J. 281 (1971), and the right to advice concerning basic constitutional rights before custodial questioning can be effective, Berkemer v. McCarty, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed. 2d 317 (1984), 35 Cr.L. 3192, it is not a civil disability resulting from a conviction of crime which, when added to a six-month sentence causes a right to a jury trial to arise.

1984While the revocation of one's driving privilege is "a consequence of magnitude" that is serious enough to call into play the right to counsel, Rodriguez v. Rosenblatt, 58 N.J. 281 (1971), and the right to advice concerning basic constitutional rights before custodial questioning can be effective, Berkemer v. McCarty, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed. 2d 317 (1984), 35 Cr.L. 3192, it is not a civil disability resulting from a conviction of crime which, when added to a six-month sentence causes a right to a jury trial to arise.

1984While the revocation of one's driving privilege is "a consequence of magnitude" that is serious enough to call into play the right to counsel, Rodriguez v. Rosenblatt, 58 N.J. 281 (1971), and the right to advice concerning basic constitutional rights before custodial questioning can be effective, Berkemer v. McCarty, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed. 2d 317 (1984), 35 Cr.L. 3192, it is not a civil disability resulting from a conviction of crime which, when added to a six-month sentence causes a right to a jury trial to arise.