39 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1912–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pottergreen2 sentences2008See State v. Potter, 156 Wn.2d 835, 840 , 132 P.3d 1089 (2006) (State bears the burden of establishing an exception to warrant requirement.). 2008State v. Potter, 156 Wn.2d 835, 840 , 132 P.3d 1089 (2006). ¶13 A warrantless search is constitutional when valid consent is granted. | 2 | 12 |
State v. Afanagreen2 sentences2011See State v. Afana, 169 Wn.2d 169, 177 , 233 P.3d 879 (2010) (the State always bears the burden of establishing an exception to the warrant requirement). 2011See State v. Afana, 169 Wash.2d 169, 177 , 233 P.3d 879 (2010) (the State always bears the burden of establishing an exception to the warrant requirement). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Afanagreen2 sentences2011See State v. Afana, 169 Wn.2d 169, 177 , 233 P.3d 879 (2010) (the State always bears the burden of establishing an exception to the warrant requirement). 2011See State v. Afana, 169 Wash.2d 169, 177 , 233 P.3d 879 (2010) (the State always bears the burden of establishing an exception to the warrant requirement). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Pottergreen2 sentences2008See State v. Potter, 156 Wn.2d 835, 840 , 132 P.3d 1089 (2006) (State bears the burden of establishing an exception to warrant requirement.). 2008State v. Potter, 156 Wn.2d 835, 840 , 132 P.3d 1089 (2006). ¶13 A warrantless search is constitutional when valid consent is granted. | 1 | 12 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Moigreen1 sentence2020In re Personal Restraint of Moi, 184 Wn.2d at 579 (2015). | 1 | 1 |
| Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ladson
green
2 sentences2015State v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 349-50 , 979 P.2d 833 (1999). 1 Hankerson also challenges the delayed entry of the CrR 3.6 findings of fact and conclusions of law. 2013Ladson, 138 Wn.2d at 350 . ¶18 One exception is an investigative stop, including a traffic stop, that is based on a police officer’s reasonable suspicion of either criminal activity or a traffic infraction. | 3 | 2013–2015 |
State v. Schultz
green
2 sentences2015Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 . 2015Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 . | 3 | 2014–2015 |
State v. Hendrickson
green
2 sentences2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. 2007Id. at 71, 917 P.2d 563 . | 3 | 2003–2014 |
State v. Guloy
green
2 sentences2008State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985). ¶19 No decisions address the specific issue here; that is, was it harmless error for the trial court to impanel a jury before the Blakely-fix statute went into effect to determine aggravating circumstances that would extend Mr. Doney’s sentence? 2008State v. Guloy, 104 Wn.2d 412, 425 , 705 P.2d 1182 (1985). ¶19 No decisions address the specific issue here; that is, was it harmless error for the trial court to impanel a jury before the Blakely-fix statute went into effect to determine aggravating circumstances that would extend Mr. Doney’s sentence? | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Carneh
green
2 sentences2020RCW 10.77.030(2); State v. Carneh, 153 Wn.2d 274, 282 , 103 P.3d 743 (2004). 2020RCW 10.77.030(2); Carneh, 153 Wn.2d at 282 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Carneh
green
1 sentence2020RCW 10.77.030(2); State v. Carneh, 153 Wn.2d 274, 282 , 103 P.3d 743 (2004). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Gallegos
green
1 sentence2019Gallegos, 73 Wn. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Tatham v. Rogers
green
1 sentence2019Tatham, 170 Wn. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State Of Washington v. Norman Granvel Rooney
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 658-59 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2017Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. 2017Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Tyler
green
2 sentences2017Tyler, 177 Wn.2d at 698 . ¶17 Law enforcement may lawfully impound a vehicle for three reasons: (1) as evidence of a crime, (2) under the community caretaking function, or (3) when the driver has committed a “traffic offense for which the legislature has expressly authorized impoundment.” Id. ¶18 But even if one of these reasons exists, an officer may impound a vehicle only if there are no reasonable alternatives. 2017Tyler, 177 Wn.2d at 698 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Robinson v. City of Seattle
green
1 sentence2016Robinson, 119 Wn.2d at 65-66 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. W.R.
green
1 sentence2016In State v. W.R., 181 Wn.2d 757 (2014), the state Supreme Court overruled both State v. Camara and State v. Gregory. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Christianson v. Snohomish Health District
green
1 sentence2016Christianson v. Snohomish Health Dist., 82 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Ladson
green
1 sentence2015State v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 349-50 , 979 P.2d 833 (1999). 1 Hankerson also challenges the delayed entry of the CrR 3.6 findings of fact and conclusions of law. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Hendrickson
green
1 sentence2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Bradley
green
2 sentences2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. 2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. 2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Young
green
2 sentences2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. 2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2014App. 409, 415 , 16 P.3d 680 (2001) (quoting State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 185 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994)). 8 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 72 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996) (quoting State v. Bradley, 105 Wn.2d 898, 902 , 719 P.2d 546 (1986)). 9 Schultz, 170 Wn.2d at 754 (quoting State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 802 , 92 P.3d 228 (2004)). 10 Id, (quoting Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 ). 11 Thompson, 151 Wn.2d at 802 . 12 Schultz, 170Wn.2dat754. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2014No. 70262-9-1/5 private place' and 'receives heightened constitutional protection.'"7 Subject to "'jealously and carefully drawn'" exceptions, a warrantless search is unreasonable.8 The emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement "'allows for the limited invasion of constitutionally protected privacy rights when it is necessary for police officers to render aid or assistance.'"9 "This exception emerges from the police's 'community caretaking function' "10 It is "divorced" from a criminal investigation.11 The State bears the burden of establishing an exception to the warrant requirement. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Bakke
green
1 sentence2013State v. Bakke. 44 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Ashue
green
1 sentence2012Cf. State v. Ashue, 145 Wn. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Alvarez
green
1 sentence2008Cf. State v. Alvarez, 128 Wn.2d 1 , 904 P.2d 754 (1995) (remanding for revision of written findings of fact and conclusions of law based on evidence already heard where findings did not meet requirements of court rule requiring findings to state ultimate facts); State v. Souza, 60 Wn. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| State v. Alvarez green | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| State v. Souza green | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| State v. Earls green | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| Askey v. New York Life Insurance neutral | 1 | 1932–1932 |
| M'culloch v. State of Maryland green | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.