Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1903–1980 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Woodsgreen1 sentence1980Accord, see Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Woods, 449 S.W.2d 86 (Tex.Civ.App.— Fort Worth 1969, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Olivier v. Life and Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee, 440 S.W.2d 398 (Tex.Civ.App.— Beaumont 1969, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Employers Casualty Company v. Patterson, 344 S.W.2d 199 (Tex.Civ.App. — Amarillo 1961, writ dism’d). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Harris
neutral
2 sentences1961“In the case of Travelers’ Insurance Company v. Harris, supra, the Commission of Appeals, speaking through Judge Sadler, in an opinion adopted by the Supreme Court, after an exhaustive review of the decisions which hold for and against the contention made here, says: ‘In view of the decisions by our Supreme Court * * * we are of the opinion that the burden rests upon the plaintiff to show that her cause of action does not fall within the excepting clause.’ ” We conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and remanded for another trial in accordance with this opinion. 1961"In the case of Travelers' Insurance Company v. Harris, supra, the Commission of Appeals, speaking through *927 Judge Sadler, in an opinion adopted by the Supreme Court, after an exhaustive review of the decisions which hold for and against the contention made here, says: `In view of the decisions by our Supreme Court * * * we are of the opinion that the burden rests upon the plaintiff to show that her cause of action does not fall within the excepting clause.'" We conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and remanded for another trial in accordance with this opinion. | 2 | 1919–1961 |
Employers Casualty Company v. Patterson
green
1 sentence1980Accord, see Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Woods, 449 S.W.2d 86 (Tex.Civ.App.— Fort Worth 1969, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Olivier v. Life and Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee, 440 S.W.2d 398 (Tex.Civ.App.— Beaumont 1969, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Employers Casualty Company v. Patterson, 344 S.W.2d 199 (Tex.Civ.App. — Amarillo 1961, writ dism’d). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Olivier v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee
green
1 sentence1980Accord, see Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Woods, 449 S.W.2d 86 (Tex.Civ.App.— Fort Worth 1969, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Olivier v. Life and Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee, 440 S.W.2d 398 (Tex.Civ.App.— Beaumont 1969, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Employers Casualty Company v. Patterson, 344 S.W.2d 199 (Tex.Civ.App. — Amarillo 1961, writ dism’d). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Higgins v. Bordages
green
1 sentence1930It is admitted that this Court in the case of Higgins v. Bordages, 88 Texas, 458 , held that such assessments were not included, and that no lien existed against a homestead for their collection. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
City of Boston v. Brooks
green
2 sentences1923Now, applying the rule by which we must be governed in considering an agreed statement, and keeping in mind that the burden of proof is upon the insurer to establish that the killing occurred under circumstances not constituting an accident, as that term is used in the excepting clause of its contract, and as well the meaning of the term "accident" when employed in its general sense, and its customary use, we come now to consider the agreed statement as made by the parties upon which the case was tried and is now properly before us, for the purpose of determining whether the insurer in this ca 1923Now, applying the rule by which we must be governed in considering an agreed statement, and keeping in mind that the burden of proof is upon the insurer to establish that the killing occurred under circumstances not constituting an accident, as that term is used in the excepting clause of its contract, and as well the meaning of the term "accident" when employed in its general sense, and its customary use, we come now to consider the agreed statement as made by the parties upon which the case was tried and is now properly before us, for the purpose of determining whether the insurer in this ca | 1 | 1923–1923 |
State ex rel. Rogers v. Rombauer
neutral
1 sentence1923Now, applying the rule by which we must be governed in considering an agreed statement, and keeping in mind that the burden of proof is upon the insurer to establish that the killing occurred under circumstances not constituting an accident, as that term is used in the excepting clause of its contract, and as well the meaning of the term "accident" when employed in its general sense, and its customary use, we come now to consider the agreed statement as made by the parties upon which the case was tried and is now properly before us, for the purpose of determining whether the insurer in this ca | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n
green
2 sentences1923Lovelace v. Traveler's Protective Assn., 126 Mo., 104 , 28 S.W. 877 ; Union Casualty Surety Company v. Harroll, 98 Tenn. 581 , 40 S.W. 1080 . 1923Lovelace v. Traveler's Protective Assn., 126 Mo., 104 , 28 S.W. 877 ; Union Casualty Surety Company v. Harroll, 98 Tenn. 581 , 40 S.W. 1080 . | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Union Casualty v. Harroll
green
1 sentence1923Lovelace v. Traveler's Protective Assn., 126 Mo., 104 , 28 S.W. 877 ; Union Casualty Surety Company v. Harroll, 98 Tenn. 581 , 40 S.W. 1080 . | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Insurance Co. v. Boon
green
2 sentences1917That this is the fair and natural interpretation of the language of the parties in the contract sued on we do not doubt, and we think these conclusions are supported by the decisions in Insurance Co. v. Boon, 95 U. S. 117 [ 24 L. 1917That this is the fair and natural interpretation of the language of the parties in the contract sued on we do not doubt, and we think these conclusions are supported by the decisions in Insurance Co. v. Boon, 95 U. S. 117 [ 24 L. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Breitling v. Chester
green
2 sentences1903See the following pertinent authorities in support of the conclusion reached: Chester v. Breitling, 88 Texas, 586 , 32 S. W. 1903See the following pertinent authorities in support of the conclusion reached: Chester v. Breitling, 88 Texas, 586 , 32 S. W. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.