Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2015Urtax Cope § 80-8-5(8)(a). 195 The first three factors are a codification of our analysis in Jones v. Jones, 700 P.2d 1072, 1075 (Utah 1985), and are often referred to as the Jones factors. 2015UTAH CODE § 30-3-5(8)(a). ¶95 The first three factors are a codification of our analysis in Jones v. Jones, 700 P.2d 1072, 1075 (Utah 1985), and are often referred to as the Jones factors. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. State
green
1 sentence2024See supra ¶ 36. 12 Cite as: 2024 UT 27 Opinion of the Court to place on any one type of evidence.” Brown, 2013 UT 42, ¶ 50 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence2024See supra ¶ 36. 12 Cite as: 2024 UT 27 Opinion of the Court to place on any one type of evidence.” Brown, 2013 UT 42, ¶ 50 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Mayle v. Felix
green
2 sentences2019Instead, the dissent eschews the standard we have employed for nearly seventy years-since the codification of rule 15(c) in 1950-in favor of a federal standard that did not exist, even in federal courts, at the time of the rule's adoption. 545 U.S. 644 , 125 S.Ct. 2562 , 162 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005). 2019Instead, the dissent eschews the standard we have employed for nearly seventy years-since the codification of rule 15(c) in 1950-in favor of a federal standard that did not exist, even in federal courts, at the time of the rule's adoption. 545 U.S. 644 , 125 S.Ct. 2562 , 162 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Noor v. State
green
1 sentence2019Instead, the dissent eschews the standard we have employed for nearly seventy years—since the codification of rule 15(c) in 1950—in favor of a federal standard that did not exist, even in federal courts, at the time of the rule’s adoption. 52 545 U.S. 644 (2005). 53 Id. at 664 . 20 Cite as: 2019 UT 3 Opinion of the Court Amended Petition did not arise from the same factual allegations as the Original Petition, noting that “[w]hile the Original Petition does mention Mr. Noor’s difficulty speaking and understanding English, the Original Petition does not discuss any problems with the interpreter | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State ex rel. Robinson v. Durand
green
2 sentences1979State ex rel Robinson v. Durand, 36 Utah 93 , 104 P. 760 (1909). 6 . 1979State ex rel Robinson v. Durand, 36 Utah 93 , 104 P. 760 (1909). 6 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.