5 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carroll v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2015See Carroll, 278 Va. at 691 -92 , 685 S.E.2d at 651 . 2015See Carroll, 278 Va. at 691 -92 , 685 S.E.2d at 651 . | 1 | 1 |
Tarwid v. Stategreen1 sentence1989For example, an automobile may not be stopped because of a reason that does not in fact exist; State v. Barrow, 397 N.E.2d 422, 424 (Ohio App. 1978); or one that is incredible; Tarwid v. State, 363 S.E.2d 63, 65 (Ga. App. 1987); United States v. Cruz, 358 F.2d 535, 541 (5th Cir. 1978); or one that is discounted before the detention; State v. Garland, 482 A.2d 139 (Me. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barrowgreen1 sentence1989For example, an automobile may not be stopped because of a reason that does not in fact exist; State v. Barrow, 397 N.E.2d 422, 424 (Ohio App. 1978); or one that is incredible; Tarwid v. State, 363 S.E.2d 63, 65 (Ga. App. 1987); United States v. Cruz, 358 F.2d 535, 541 (5th Cir. 1978); or one that is discounted before the detention; State v. Garland, 482 A.2d 139 (Me. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1996In Turner v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 666 , 222 S.E.2d 517 (1976), after a juvenile petition was filed, the juvenile defendant and the defendant’s father appeared before the juvenile court for a detention hearing on October 7, 1974. 1996In Turner v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 666 , 222 S.E.2d 517 (1976), after a juvenile petition was filed, the juvenile defendant and the defendant’s father appeared before the juvenile court for a detention hearing on October 7, 1974. | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1998She contends the statements were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and that the statements were the unlawful fruit of an earlier detention in violation of the Fourth Amendment. 1998She contends the statements were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and that the statements were the unlawful fruit of an earlier detention in violation of the Fourth Amendment. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Garland
green
1 sentence1989For example, an automobile may not be stopped because of a reason that does not in fact exist; State v. Barrow, 397 N.E.2d 422, 424 (Ohio App. 1978); or one that is incredible; Tarwid v. State, 363 S.E.2d 63, 65 (Ga. App. 1987); United States v. Cruz, 358 F.2d 535, 541 (5th Cir. 1978); or one that is discounted before the detention; State v. Garland, 482 A.2d 139 (Me. 1984). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.