binding rule (Vermont) · Go Syfert
← Vermont issues

binding rule in Vermont

5 Vermont opinions name it 1 courts 1918–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Granite City Cooperative Creamery Ass'n v. B & K Cheese Co.green
vt · 1949 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Creamery Ass’n v. B & K Cheese Co., 115 Vt. 408, 412 , 63 A.2d 193, 196 (1949). ¶ 20.

2014Creamery Ass’n v. B & K Cheese Co., 115 Vt. 408, 412 , 63 A.2d 193, 196 (1949). ¶ 20.

11
Nzomo v. Vermont State Collegesgreen
vt · 1978 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992Nzomo v. Vermont State Colleges, 136 Vt. 97, 102 , 385 A.2d 1099, 1102 (1978).

1992Nzomo v. Vermont State Colleges, 136 Vt. 97, 102 , 385 A.2d 1099, 1102 (1978).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Grievance of Gobin green
vt · 1992
2 sentences

2004Finally and most recently in Gobin, 158 Vt. at 434 , 610 A.2d at 151 , we reiterated that failure of an employer “to follow a binding rule constitutes an actionable grievance.” We held that the UVM provost’s guidelines for the distribution of salary adjustments were binding rules for purposes of grievant’s complaint that he did not receive the salary raise called for in those guidelines.

2004Finally and most recently in Gobin, 158 Vt. at 434 , 610 A.2d at 151 , we reiterated that failure of an employer “to follow a binding rule constitutes an actionable grievance.” We held that the UVM provost’s guidelines for the distribution of salary adjustments were binding rules for purposes of grievant’s complaint that he did not receive the salary raise called for in those guidelines.

12004–2004
Hall v. Fletcher green
vt · 1927
2 sentences

1932Hall v. Fletcher, 100 Vt. 210, 212 , 136 Atl. 388 , and cases cited.

1932Hall v. Fletcher, 100 Vt. 210, 212 , 136 Atl. 388 , and cases cited.

11932–1932
Joslyn v. Moose River Lumber Co. neutral
vt · 1909
1 sentence

1918It is urged, citing Joslyn v. Moose River Lumber Co., 83 Vt. 50 , 74 Atl. 385 , 138 Am.

11918–1918

Where else courts name it

OH 125 (1924–2026) WV 59 (1899–2018) PA 58 (1891–2025) AR 26 (1938–2003) FL 16 (1971–2026) TX 15 (1922–2025) MI 15 (2000–2025) IL 14 (1960–2025) NY 14 (1906–2026) MD 12 (1949–2022) MO 9 (1876–2009) KS 7 (1948–2017) IN 5 (1915–1988) NJ 5 (1919–2003) RI 5 (2002–2022) VT 5 (1918–2014) CT 4 (1898–1997) OK 4 (1905–1999) MN 4 (1994–2026) WI 4 (1978–2011) AL 4 (1911–2026) AZ 3 (1985–2006) MT 3 (1929–1976) GA 3 (1975–2024) CA 3 (1980–2021) OR 3 (1932–2012) CO 2 (1971–2002) LA 2 (1941–2014) UT 2 (2004–2026) WA 2 (2009–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check