contingent claim (Vermont) · Go Syfert
← Vermont issues

contingent claim in Vermont

5 Vermont opinions name it 1 courts 1884–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Administrator of Sargent's Estate v. Administrator of Kimball's Estategreen
vt · 1864 · cited in 2 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1938–1939
2 sentences

1939Section 2940 of the Public Laws reads as follows: “If a person is liable as surety for the deceased, or has other contingent claims against his estate which cannot be proved as a debt before the commissioners or allowed by them, the sáme may be presented, with the proof, to the probate court, or to the commissioners, who shall state in their report that such claim was presented to them.” A contingent claim under the statute is one “where the liability depends upon some future event, which may or may not happen, and therefore makes it now wholly uncertain whether there ever will be a liability.

1938If an action is commenced against an executor or administrator, on a contingent claim which has not been presented to the commissioners and for the payment of which sufficient assets have not been retained, the executor or administrator may plead to such action that he has fully administered the estate which has come to his possession or knowledge; and if it appears that he had fully administered at the time the claim was presented and had no assets which could lawfully be appropriated for that purpose, he shall be discharged and shall recover his costs; but if it is found that he had assets s

12
Matey v. Estate of Dembergreen
conn · 2001 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Although not defined in chapter 66 of Title 14, the word “claim” in statutes that establish deadlines for filing claims in probate proceedings generally “means those obligations which are in the broad sense of the term, debts and would include obligations arising out of contract express or implied.” Matey v. Estate of Dember, 774 A.2d 113, 126-27 (Conn. 2001) (citation omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Kreichman v. Webster, Admr. green
vt · 1938
1 sentence

1939Section 2940 of the Public Laws reads as follows: “If a person is liable as surety for the deceased, or has other contingent claims against his estate which cannot be proved as a debt before the commissioners or allowed by them, the sáme may be presented, with the proof, to the probate court, or to the commissioners, who shall state in their report that such claim was presented to them.” A contingent claim under the statute is one “where the liability depends upon some future event, which may or may not happen, and therefore makes it now wholly uncertain whether there ever will be a liability.

11939–1939
Vermont-Peoples' National Bank v. Robbins' Estate neutral
· 1933
2 sentences

1938Bank v. Robbins’ Est., 105 Vt. 283, 288 , 166 Atl. 6 .

1938Bank v. Robbins’ Est., 105 Vt. 283, 288 , 166 Atl. 6 .

11938–1938
Brown's Exr. v. Dunn's Est. green
vt · 1903
2 sentences

1923Brown’s Executors v. Dunn’s Estate, 75 Vt. 264 , 55 Atl. 364 .

1923Brown’s Executors v. Dunn’s Estate, 75 Vt. 264 , 55 Atl. 364 .

11923–1923
Blackmer v. Blackmer neutral
vt · 1833
1 sentence

1884Such was the claim — a debt upon the bond of the intestate for the payment of an annuity of $100 during the life of the annuitant — in Blackmer v. Blackmer, 5 Vt. 355 .

11884–1884

Where else courts name it

NY 26 (1856–2011) IL 17 (1894–2009) FL 16 (1981–2006) TX 16 (1902–2025) CA 15 (1892–2022) MN 14 (1895–2010) WI 13 (1889–2000) MI 12 (1877–2016) PA 12 (1923–2006) NE 11 (1930–1979) IA 8 (1916–2019) OK 8 (1920–2016) OH 7 (1938–2021) WA 7 (1913–2012) MO 6 (1903–2022) SD 5 (1929–2022) VT 5 (1884–2014) AR 4 (1957–2008) CO 4 (1992–2016) RI 4 (1909–2025) UT 4 (1898–2022) KS 4 (1909–2016) IN 4 (1970–2007) NJ 4 (1996–2025) TN 3 (1981–2003) WY 3 (1883–2026) ND 2 (1909–1939) SC 2 (1934–2014) CT 2 (1992–2005) MA 2 (1980–1995) NH 2 (1845–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check