principle underlying rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

principle underlying rule in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1909–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Taylor v. Louisiana green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

2013The principle underlying this requirement is that the jury cannot serve its function "to make available the commonsense judgment of the community as a hedge against the overzealous or mistaken prosecutor and ... professional or perhaps overconditioned or biased response of a judge" if"distinctive groups are excluded from the pool." Id. at 530 .

2013The principle underlying this requirement is that the jury cannot serve its function “to make available the commonsense judgment of the community as a hedge against the overzealous or mistaken prosecutor and . . . professional or perhaps overconditioned or biased response of a judge” if “distinctive groups are excluded from the pool.” Id. at 530 .

22013–2013
In re the Personal Restraint of Lalande neutral
washctapp · 1981
2 sentences

2001In re Personal Restraint of La-Lande, 30 Wash.App. 402, 405 , 634 P.2d 895 (1981).

2001In re Personal Restraint of La-Lande, 30 Wash.App. 402, 405 , 634 P.2d 895 (1981).

12001–2001
Public Utility District No. 2 v. State neutral
wash · 1961
2 sentences

1976In PUD 2 v. State, 58 Wn.2d 873, 875 , 365 P.2d 22 (1961), we noted in dicta that the county would be entitled to compensation only to the extent that it was obligated to construct a highway to replace the highway taken by condemnation.

1976In PUD 2 v. State, 58 Wn.2d 873, 875 , 365 P.2d 22 (1961), we noted in dicta that the county would be entitled to compensation only to the extent that it was obligated to construct a highway to replace the highway taken by condemnation.

11976–1976
Burnett v. Whitesides neutral
cal · 1860
1 sentence

1909We find the principle underlying the rule quoted in Burnett v. Whitesides, 15 Cal. 35, where the rights of the first appropriator were limited to the natural waters of the stream.

11909–1909

Where else courts name it

IL 17 (1920–2025) TX 15 (1930–2025) CA 13 (1935–2022) NY 13 (1908–2025) MT 7 (1905–2015) PA 6 (1922–2025) KS 6 (1928–2020) MO 6 (1905–1998) IN 5 (1894–1904) WA 5 (1909–2013) MI 4 (1877–1992) UT 4 (1989–2005) DC 4 (2006–2024) NJ 4 (1952–2019) MD 4 (1913–2023) OH 4 (1919–2013) OR 4 (1905–2015) GA 3 (1941–2001) AR 3 (1914–1955) LA 3 (1920–1999) IA 3 (1927–1938) AZ 3 (1960–2015) AL 3 (1918–2009) RI 3 (2014–2023) TN 3 (1929–2004) SD 2 (1997–1997) WI 2 (1990–1999) DE 2 (1930–1998) VA 2 (1906–1923) KY 2 (1913–1941)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check