unquestioned rule (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

unquestioned rule in Missouri

5 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1885–1985 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Lewisgreen
mo · 1982 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
2 sentences

1985State v. Lewis, 642 S.W.2d 627, 630 (Mo. banc 1982).

1985State v. Lewis, 642 S.W.2d 627, 630 (Mo. banc 1982).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Kaufmann v. Krahling green
moctapp · 1975
1 sentence

1978Kaufmann, supra, however, recognizes that if the evidence supports a finding of joint participation in the acts creating the lien or if there is a logical inference of agency arising from the facts in evidence, then the lien may be imposed.

11978–1978
Watkins v. Watkins neutral
moctapp · 1896
1 sentence

1913In Watkins v. Watkins, 66 Mo. App. 468 , it is held that the circuit court, after dismissing plaintiff’s petition in a divorce proceeding, has no jurisdiction pending a motion for new trial and before application for an appeal is made, to allow the plaintiff' alimony to prosecute an appeal.

11913–1913
Johnson v. State green
ala · 1860
1 sentence

1891I have examined every case ■cited in the opinion, and find that only in one of them, Johnson v. State, 35 Ala. 363, is the material portion of the indictment set out in the opinion, .and in that case no intent is charged.

11891–1891
Imler v. City of Springfield neutral
mo · 1874
1 sentence

1885Co., 58 Barb. 413 ; Turner v. The Inhabitants, etc., 13 Allen, 291 ; Imber v. City of Springfield, 55 Mo. 119 , and cases there cited.” The rule thus stated is to-day the unquestioned rule in this state.

11885–1885
Turner v. Inhabitants of Dartmouth green
mass · 1866
1 sentence

1885Co., 58 Barb. 413 ; Turner v. The Inhabitants, etc., 13 Allen, 291 ; Imber v. City of Springfield, 55 Mo. 119 , and cases there cited.” The rule thus stated is to-day the unquestioned rule in this state.

11885–1885
Waffle v. New York Central Railroad neutral
nysupct · 1870
1 sentence

1885Co., 58 Barb. 413 ; Turner v. The Inhabitants, etc., 13 Allen, 291 ; Imber v. City of Springfield, 55 Mo. 119 , and cases there cited.” The rule thus stated is to-day the unquestioned rule in this state.

11885–1885

Where else courts name it

CT 123 (1893–2026) CA 15 (1896–2013) IA 11 (1916–2026) MD 10 (1849–2024) GA 7 (1936–1997) IL 6 (1909–1989) AZ 5 (1915–1939) NC 5 (1970–1992) WI 5 (1888–1929) NY 5 (1888–1980) MO 5 (1885–1985) NE 4 (1933–1945) PA 4 (1921–1981) KS 4 (1919–2010) MI 4 (1901–1978) ME 4 (1854–2014) KY 3 (1931–2006) HI 3 (1992–2007) MN 3 (1929–1940) NH 2 (1943–1992) MA 2 (1861–2001) LA 2 (1961–1963) NJ 2 (1880–1976) OR 2 (1923–1976) WA 2 (1911–1993) CO 2 (1934–2005) OK 2 (1935–1935) OH 2 (1935–2003) TX 2 (1880–1932) VA 2 (1933–1986) PR 2 (1934–1940) FL 2 (1954–1955)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check