Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1970–1992 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Grand Jury Proceedingsgreen1 sentence1992In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (John Doe), 727 F.2d 1352, 1356 (4th Cir. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pendergraph v. . Davis
neutral
2 sentences1982Shaver v. Shaver, 248 N.C. 113 , 102 S.E. 2d 791 (1958); Pendergraph v. Davis, 205 N.C. 29 , 169 S.E. 815 (1933); A. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice And Procedure § 1712 (T. 1982Shaver v. Shaver, 248 N.C. 113 , 102 S.E. 2d 791 (1958); Pendergraph v. Davis, 205 N.C. 29 , 169 S.E. 815 (1933); A. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice And Procedure § 1712 (T. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Shaver v. Shaver
green
2 sentences1982Shaver v. Shaver, 248 N.C. 113 , 102 S.E. 2d 791 (1958); Pendergraph v. Davis, 205 N.C. 29 , 169 S.E. 815 (1933); A. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice And Procedure § 1712 (T. 1982Shaver v. Shaver, 248 N.C. 113 , 102 S.E. 2d 791 (1958); Pendergraph v. Davis, 205 N.C. 29 , 169 S.E. 815 (1933); A. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice And Procedure § 1712 (T. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Gray v. North Carolina
green
1 sentence1977State v. Bishop, 272 N.C. 283 , 158 S.E. 2d 511 ; State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 , Cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Gray
green
2 sentences1977State v. Bishop, 272 N.C. 283 , 158 S.E. 2d 511 ; State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 , Cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 . 1977State v. Bishop, 272 N.C. 283 , 158 S.E. 2d 511 ; State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 , Cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Bishop
green
2 sentences1977State v. Bishop, 272 N.C. 283 , 158 S.E. 2d 511 ; State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 , Cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 . 1977State v. Bishop, 272 N.C. 283 , 158 S.E. 2d 511 ; State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69 , 150 S.E. 2d 1 , Cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Guffey
green
2 sentences1976State v. Cutler, 271 N.C. 379 , 156 S.E. 2d 679 ; State v. Guffey, 252 N.C. 60 , 112 S.E. 2d 734 . 1976State v. Cutler, 271 N.C. 379 , 156 S.E. 2d 679 ; State v. Guffey, 252 N.C. 60 , 112 S.E. 2d 734 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Cutler
green
2 sentences1976State v. Cutler, 271 N.C. 379 , 156 S.E. 2d 679 ; State v. Guffey, 252 N.C. 60 , 112 S.E. 2d 734 . 1976State v. Cutler, 271 N.C. 379 , 156 S.E. 2d 679 ; State v. Guffey, 252 N.C. 60 , 112 S.E. 2d 734 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. . Roberts
green
1 sentence1970State v. Vickers, 274 N.C. 311 , 163 S.E. 2d 481 ; State v. Gray, supra; State v. Roberts, 12 N.C. 259 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
State v. Vickers
green
2 sentences1970State v. Vickers, 274 N.C. 311 , 163 S.E. 2d 481 ; State v. Gray, supra; State v. Roberts, 12 N.C. 259 . 1970State v. Vickers, 274 N.C. 311 , 163 S.E. 2d 481 ; State v. Gray, supra; State v. Roberts, 12 N.C. 259 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.