Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nicholsongreen2 sentences2026See State v. Nicholson, 282 Or App 51, 56-57 , 383 P3d 977 (2016) (applying that standard). 2026See State v. Nicholson, 282 Or App 51, 56-57 , 383 P3d 977 (2016) (applying that standard). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Badger v. Couey
green
2 sentences2024Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), and Couey and Couey, 312 Or 302 , 821 P2d 1086 (1991). 2016The legislature’s consideration of the measure—and, specifically, its inclusion of a “willful” mental state—occurred in the immediate wake of our decision in Couey and Couey, 105 Or App 478 , 805 P2d 716 (1991), which the Supreme Court reversed in Couey, 312 Or 302 . 11 As noted, the text of the antecedent contempt statute did not include a reference to willfulness—or, for that matter, to any culpable mental state—but judicial decisions had incorporated and applied a willfulness requirement. | 3 | 2016–2024 |
State Ex Rel. Grover v. Grover
green
2 sentences2024Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), and Couey and Couey, 312 Or 302 , 821 P2d 1086 (1991). 2024Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), and Couey and Couey, 312 Or 302 , 821 P2d 1086 (1991). | 3 | 2016–2024 |
Felton v. United States
green
2 sentences2016For example, in Rust v. Pratt, 157 Or 505, 510 , 72 P2d 533 (1937), appeal dismissed, 303 US 621 , 58 S Ct 648 , 82 L Ed 1084 (1938), the Supreme Court quoted with approval the trial court’s statement that contempt “is the wilful disregard of the authority of a court of justice.” The next year, in State ex rel Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635, 639 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), the court quoted, with apparent approval, the United States Supreme Court’s statement in Felton v. United States, 96 US 699, 702 , 24 L Ed 875 (1877), that “[d]oing or omitting to do a thing knowingly and wilfully, implies not only a 2016For example, in Rust v. Pratt, 157 Or 505, 510 , 72 P2d 533 (1937), appeal dismissed, 303 US 621 , 58 S Ct 648 , 82 L Ed 1084 (1938), the Supreme Court quoted with approval the trial court’s statement that contempt “is the wilful disregard of the authority of a court of justice.” The next year, in State ex rel Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635, 639 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), the court quoted, with apparent approval, the United States Supreme Court’s statement in Felton v. United States, 96 US 699, 702 , 24 L Ed 875 (1877), that “[d]oing or omitting to do a thing knowingly and wilfully, implies not only a | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State ex rel. Badger v. Couey
green
2 sentences2016The legislature’s consideration of the measure—and, specifically, its inclusion of a “willful” mental state—occurred in the immediate wake of our decision in Couey and Couey, 105 Or App 478 , 805 P2d 716 (1991), which the Supreme Court reversed in Couey, 312 Or 302 . 11 As noted, the text of the antecedent contempt statute did not include a reference to willfulness—or, for that matter, to any culpable mental state—but judicial decisions had incorporated and applied a willfulness requirement. 2016The legislature’s consideration of the measure—and, specifically, its inclusion of a “willful” mental state—occurred in the immediate wake of our decision in Couey and Couey, 105 Or App 478 , 805 P2d 716 (1991), which the Supreme Court reversed in Couey, 312 Or 302 . 11 As noted, the text of the antecedent contempt statute did not include a reference to willfulness—or, for that matter, to any culpable mental state—but judicial decisions had incorporated and applied a willfulness requirement. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Rust v. Pratt
neutral
2 sentences2016For example, in Rust v. Pratt, 157 Or 505, 510 , 72 P2d 533 (1937), appeal dismissed, 303 US 621 , 58 S Ct 648 , 82 L Ed 1084 (1938), the Supreme Court quoted with approval the trial court’s statement that contempt “is the wilful disregard of the authority of a court of justice.” The next year, in State ex rel Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635, 639 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), the court quoted, with apparent approval, the United States Supreme Court’s statement in Felton v. United States, 96 US 699, 702 , 24 L Ed 875 (1877), that “[d]oing or omitting to do a thing knowingly and wilfully, implies not only a 2016For example, in Rust v. Pratt, 157 Or 505, 510 , 72 P2d 533 (1937), appeal dismissed, 303 US 621 , 58 S Ct 648 , 82 L Ed 1084 (1938), the Supreme Court quoted with approval the trial court’s statement that contempt “is the wilful disregard of the authority of a court of justice.” The next year, in State ex rel Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635, 639 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), the court quoted, with apparent approval, the United States Supreme Court’s statement in Felton v. United States, 96 US 699, 702 , 24 L Ed 875 (1877), that “[d]oing or omitting to do a thing knowingly and wilfully, implies not only a | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Rust v. Pratt
green
2 sentences2016For example, in Rust v. Pratt, 157 Or 505, 510 , 72 P2d 533 (1937), appeal dismissed, 303 US 621 , 58 S Ct 648 , 82 L Ed 1084 (1938), the Supreme Court quoted with approval the trial court’s statement that contempt “is the wilful disregard of the authority of a court of justice.” The next year, in State ex rel Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635, 639 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), the court quoted, with apparent approval, the United States Supreme Court’s statement in Felton v. United States, 96 US 699, 702 , 24 L Ed 875 (1877), that “[d]oing or omitting to do a thing knowingly and wilfully, implies not only a 2016For example, in Rust v. Pratt, 157 Or 505, 510 , 72 P2d 533 (1937), appeal dismissed, 303 US 621 , 58 S Ct 648 , 82 L Ed 1084 (1938), the Supreme Court quoted with approval the trial court’s statement that contempt “is the wilful disregard of the authority of a court of justice.” The next year, in State ex rel Grover v. Grover, 158 Or 635, 639 , 77 P2d 430 (1938), the court quoted, with apparent approval, the United States Supreme Court’s statement in Felton v. United States, 96 US 699, 702 , 24 L Ed 875 (1877), that “[d]oing or omitting to do a thing knowingly and wilfully, implies not only a | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.