28 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen2 sentences2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a 2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a | 5 | 11 |
Curtis v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a 2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a | 3 | 3 |
Martinez v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Stewart, supra, 319 Md. at 90, 570 A.2d at 1234; Martinez, supra, 309 Md. at 134 , 522 A.2d [at 955]; Dortch v. State, 290 Md. 229 , [235,] 428 A.2d 1220 [, 1223] (1981). 1990“Whether there is an intelligent waiver must depend on the unique facts and circumstances of each case.” Martinez at 134, 522 A.2d 950 . *91 This appeal turns on the voluntariness of the waiver of Stewart’s right to a jury trial. | 2 | 5 |
Tibbs v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); State v. Hall, 321 Md. 178 , 582 A.2d 507 (1990); Martinez v. State, supra; Kang v. State, 163 Md.App. 22 , 877 A.2d 173 (2005). 2005See Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); State v. Hall, 321 Md. 178 , 582 A.2d 507 (1990); Martinez v. State, supra; Kang v. State, 163 Md.App. 22 , 877 A.2d 173 (2005). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Prietgreen2 sentences2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a 2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a | 1 | 2 |
Countess v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a 2006See e.g., Curtis v. State, 284 Md. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (“The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ); 11 State v. Priet, 289 Md. 267, 290 , 424 A.2d 349, 360-61 (1981) (holding guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily entered when trial judge questioned each defendant at length as to voluntariness of plea, a | 1 | 2 |
Doe v. City of New Yorkgreen1 sentence2007The type of medical records and nature of their contents are essential starting points for an intelligent analysis *121 of the government need versus patient privacy question because “[t]he [federal constitutional] interest in the privacy of medical information will vary with the [patient’s] condition.” Powell, supra, 175 F.3d at 111 (holding that HIV positive transsexual had a fundamental constitutional privacy right in keeping private her HIV status and her transsexualism, caused by gender identity disorder, a “profound psychiatric” condition); City of New York, supra, 15 F.3d at 267 (holdin | 1 | 1 |
Wayne Powell, as of the Estate of Dana Kimberly Devilla v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent Thomas A. Coughlin, III C.O. Lynch C.O. Crowleygreen2 sentences2007The type of medical records and nature of their contents are essential starting points for an intelligent analysis *121 of the government need versus patient privacy question because “[t]he [federal constitutional] interest in the privacy of medical information will vary with the [patient’s] condition.” Powell, supra, 175 F.3d at 111 (holding that HIV positive transsexual had a fundamental constitutional privacy right in keeping private her HIV status and her transsexualism, caused by gender identity disorder, a “profound psychiatric” condition); City of New York, supra, 15 F.3d at 267 (holdin 2007The type of medical records and nature of their contents are essential starting points for an intelligent analysis *121 of the government need versus patient privacy question because “[t]he [federal constitutional] interest in the privacy of medical information will vary with the [patient’s] condition.” Powell, supra, 175 F.3d at 111 (holding that HIV positive transsexual had a fundamental constitutional privacy right in keeping private her HIV status and her transsexualism, caused by gender identity disorder, a “profound psychiatric” condition); City of New York, supra, 15 F.3d at 267 (holdin | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bellgreen2 sentences2003See State v. Bell, 351 Md. 709 , 720 A.2d 311 (1998); Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); Stewart v. State, 319 Md. 81 , 570 A.2d 1229 (1990); Martinez, supra, 309 Md. at 134 , 522 A.2d at 955 ; Dortch v. State, 290 Md. 229 , 428 A.2d 1220 (1981); Countess v. State, 286 Md. 444 , 408 A.2d 1302 (1979). 2003See State v. Bell, 351 Md. 709 , 720 A.2d 311 (1998); Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); Stewart v. State, 319 Md. 81 , 570 A.2d 1229 (1990); Martinez, supra, 309 Md. at 134 , 522 A.2d at 955 ; Dortch v. State, 290 Md. 229 , 428 A.2d 1220 (1981); Countess v. State, 286 Md. 444 , 408 A.2d 1302 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Hodges v. Eastongreen2 sentences1999Johnson, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 (quoting in part from Hodges v. Easton, 106 U.S. 408, 412 , 1 S.Ct. 307, 311 , 27 L.Ed. 169, 171 (1882), and Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 301 U.S. 292, 307 , 57 S.Ct. 724, 731 , 81 L.Ed. 1093, 1103 (1937)). 1999Johnson, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 (quoting in part from Hodges v. Easton, 106 U.S. 408, 412 , 1 S.Ct. 307, 311 , 27 L.Ed. 169, 171 (1882), and Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 301 U.S. 292, 307 , 57 S.Ct. 724, 731 , 81 L.Ed. 1093, 1103 (1937)). | 1 | 1 |
Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commissiongreen2 sentences1999Johnson, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 (quoting in part from Hodges v. Easton, 106 U.S. 408, 412 , 1 S.Ct. 307, 311 , 27 L.Ed. 169, 171 (1882), and Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 301 U.S. 292, 307 , 57 S.Ct. 724, 731 , 81 L.Ed. 1093, 1103 (1937)). 1999Johnson, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 (quoting in part from Hodges v. Easton, 106 U.S. 408, 412 , 1 S.Ct. 307, 311 , 27 L.Ed. 169, 171 (1882), and Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 301 U.S. 292, 307 , 57 S.Ct. 724, 731 , 81 L.Ed. 1093, 1103 (1937)). | 1 | 1 |
Logan v. Stategreen2 sentences1985The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver[, e.g.,] of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case____ See, e.g., Logan, supra, 289 Md. at 474, 425 A.2d at 639 . 1985The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver[, e.g.,] of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case____ See, e.g., Logan, supra, 289 Md. at 474, 425 A.2d at 639 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dortch v. State
green
2 sentences2008Stewart, supra, 319 Md. at 90, 570 A.2d at 1234; Martinez, supra, 309 Md. at 134 , 522 A.2d [at 955]; Dortch v. State, 290 Md. 229 , [235,] 428 A.2d 1220 [, 1223] (1981). 2008Stewart, supra, 319 Md. at 90, 570 A.2d at 1234; Martinez, supra, 309 Md. at 134 , 522 A.2d [at 955]; Dortch v. State, 290 Md. 229 , [235,] 428 A.2d 1220 [, 1223] (1981). | 5 | 1990–2008 |
State v. Hall
green
2 sentences1998In Hall, 321 Md. at 182-83 , 582 A.2d at 509 , we stated: Our cases hold that whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the jury trial right depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. 1998In Hall, 321 Md. at 182-83 , 582 A.2d at 509 , we stated: Our cases hold that whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the jury trial right depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. | 3 | 1991–2005 |
Stewart v. State
green
2 sentences2003See State v. Bell, 351 Md. 709 , 720 A.2d 311 (1998); Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); Stewart v. State, 319 Md. 81 , 570 A.2d 1229 (1990); Martinez, supra, 309 Md. at 134 , 522 A.2d at 955 ; Dortch v. State, 290 Md. 229 , 428 A.2d 1220 (1981); Countess v. State, 286 Md. 444 , 408 A.2d 1302 (1979). 2003See State v. Bell, 351 Md. 709 , 720 A.2d 311 (1998); Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); Stewart v. State, 319 Md. 81 , 570 A.2d 1229 (1990); Martinez, supra, 309 Md. at 134 , 522 A.2d at 955 ; Dortch v. State, 290 Md. 229 , 428 A.2d 1220 (1981); Countess v. State, 286 Md. 444 , 408 A.2d 1302 (1979). | 2 | 1990–2003 |
Mlb v. Slj
green
2 sentences2006Based upon this body of law, Ms. H. contends that, because CINA proceedings can be likened to criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings, as expressed by the Supreme Court in M.L.B. v. S.L.J., 519 U.S. 102 , 117 S.Ct. 555 , 136 L.Ed.2d 473 (1996), due process requires application of the more stringent standard of waiver in CINA adjudicatory proceedings. 2006Based upon this body of law, Ms. H. contends that, because CINA proceedings can be likened to criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings, as expressed by the Supreme Court in M.L.B. v. S.L.J., 519 U.S. 102 , 117 S.Ct. 555 , 136 L.Ed.2d 473 (1996), due process requires application of the more stringent standard of waiver in CINA adjudicatory proceedings. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Kang v. State
green
2 sentences2005See Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); State v. Hall, 321 Md. 178 , 582 A.2d 507 (1990); Martinez v. State, supra; Kang v. State, 163 Md.App. 22 , 877 A.2d 173 (2005). 2005See Tibbs v. State, 323 Md. 28 , 590 A.2d 550 (1991); State v. Hall, 321 Md. 178 , 582 A.2d 507 (1990); Martinez v. State, supra; Kang v. State, 163 Md.App. 22 , 877 A.2d 173 (2005). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Dedo v. State
green
1 sentence2005Finally, “whether there has been an intelligent waiver of [the right to] *344 a jury trial is to be decided by the facts and circumstances of each case.” Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Fay v. Noia
red
1 sentence1997The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver ... must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.'" Id. at 143 , 395 A.2d at 470 (emphasis omitted) (quoting Johnson, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 , 82 L.Ed. at 1466 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Parke v. Raley
green
1 sentence1993As Justice O’Connor pointed out in Parke v. Raley, supra, — U.S. at -, 113 S.Ct. at 524: At the time the prior conviction at issue in Burgett was entered, state criminal defendants’ federal constitutional right to counsel had not yet been recognized, and so it was reasonable to presume that the defendant had not waived a right he did not possess. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Cassidy v. Baltimore County Board of Appeals
green
1 sentence1983The requirements for adequate notice were discussed by the Court of Appeals in Cassidy, supra, where the Court, considering 2 Merrill, Notice, Section 796, concluded that for notice to be sufficient, it must: (1) clearly apprise those interested to defend their interests without creating the impression that a final decision already had been achieved rendering their appearance futile; (2) state the authority of the agency and the facts which give it jurisdiction; and (3) describe the character of the action proposed and the basis upon which it rests sufficiently to permit preparation of an inte | 1 | 1983–1983 |
North Carolina v. Butler
red
2 sentences1981In further commenting on this same subject, the Supreme Court has more recently stated that there exists a presumption "that a defendant did not waive his rights; the prosecution’s burden is great; but in at least some cases waiver can be clearly inferred from the actions and words of the person interrogated.” North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 373 , 99 S. Ct. 1755 , 60 L. 1981In further commenting on this same subject, the Supreme Court has more recently stated that there exists a presumption "that a defendant did not waive his rights; the prosecution’s burden is great; but in at least some cases waiver can be clearly inferred from the actions and words of the person interrogated.” North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 373 , 99 S. Ct. 1755 , 60 L. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann
green
2 sentences1979In Adams v. United States, 317 U. S. 269 , 63 S. Ct. 236 , 87 L. 1979In Adams v. United States, 317 U. S. 269 , 63 S. Ct. 236 , 87 L. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Carnley v. Cochran
green
2 sentences1979The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” The strictness of the Johnson v. Zerbst standard was underscored by the Court in Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, 516 , 82 S. Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962), where it was declared: “Presuming waiver [of the right to counsel] from a silent record is impermissible.” This high standard has been applied regarding the waiver of the right to trial by j 1979The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” The strictness of the Johnson v. Zerbst standard was underscored by the Court in Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, 516 , 82 S. Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962), where it was declared: “Presuming waiver [of the right to counsel] from a silent record is impermissible.” This high standard has been applied regarding the waiver of the right to trial by j | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Zimmerman
green
1 sentence1971It is now argued that it was incumbent upon appellant’s counsel or the trial judge to have ascertained whether appellant intelligently understood his right to a jury trial and that “the record being silent on this point it must be resolved in favor of appellant.” We think this issue is controlled by the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in State v. Zimmerman, 261 Md. 11 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Trafficante v. State
green
1 sentence1967Palacorolle v. State, supra; McMahon v. Mayo, 92 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 1957). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Hutson v. State
green
2 sentences1964It appears rather generally to be accepted that a variance in names, between that alleged and that proven, is not fatal where it does not mislead the defendant so that he cannot make an intelligent defense, or expose him to double jeopardy. 1 Underhill, Criminal Evidence (5th Ed.), Sec. 86; 2 Wharton, Criminal Evidence (12th Ed.), Sec. 653; cf. Hutson v. State, 202 Md. 333, 338-339 , 96 A. 2d 593 (1953). 1964It appears rather generally to be accepted that a variance in names, between that alleged and that proven, is not fatal where it does not mislead the defendant so that he cannot make an intelligent defense, or expose him to double jeopardy. 1 Underhill, Criminal Evidence (5th Ed.), Sec. 86; 2 Wharton, Criminal Evidence (12th Ed.), Sec. 653; cf. Hutson v. State, 202 Md. 333, 338-339 , 96 A. 2d 593 (1953). | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.