87 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2015See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851 (La.1982); State v. Reynolds, 45,674 (La.App.2d Cir.11/03/10), 55 So.3d 136 . 1988Furthermore, "[i]n proving an intelligent waiver of the rights to silence, self-incrimination, and counsel, the state need not show that defendant was aware of the full evidentiary significance of his statements." See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851, 852 (La.1982). | 6 | 6 |
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen2 sentences2016In State v. Carter, supra, the Supreme Court explained what trial courts must consider, when a defendant asserts the right to self-representation: Should a defendant wish to waive counsel and represent himself, “[t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938) ... 2016In State v. Carter, supra, the Supreme Court explained what trial courts must consider, when a defendant asserts the right to self-representation: Should a defendant wish to waive counsel and represent himself, “[t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938) ... | 4 | 26 |
State v. Straingreen2 sentences2012What is a “knowing and voluntary waiver” was discussed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Carter, 10-0614, p. 25 (La.1/24/12) 26, 84 So.3d 499 , 520: “[ t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see also State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540, 542 (La.1991)(trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, e 2012Should a defendant wish to waive counsel and represent himself, “[t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see also State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540, 542 (La.1991) (trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, education, and mental condition in deciding, on a totality of the circumstances, whether accuse | 2 | 2 |
State v. Greengreen2 sentences1996State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984). 1995State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Jamesgreen2 sentences1996State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984). 1995State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Harpergreen2 sentences2019Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La. 1980). 1986"The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused." Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La.1980). | 1 | 23 |
Faretta v. Californiagreen2 sentences2016Further, a defendant ' must be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation so that the record démonstrates that “ ‘he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with his eyes open.’” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 (quoting Adams v. United States ex rel. 2016Further, a defendant ' must be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation so that the record démonstrates that “ ‘he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with his eyes open.’” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 (quoting Adams v. United States ex rel. | 1 | 7 |
State v. Carpentergreen2 sentences2019Regarding the determination of a defendant’s waiver of counsel, in Carpenter, 390 So.2d at 1298 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows: The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel depends upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused. 2002In State v. Carpenter, 390 So.2d 1296 (La.1980), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following law regarding a waiver of defendant's right to counsel: The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel depends upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused. | 1 | 5 |
State v. Spaingreen2 sentences2018State v. Spain , 329 So.2d 178 (La. 1976) ; State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La. 1976) ; State v. Hardy , 39,233 (La. 1982An accused's right to have a particular trial action reviewed on appeal may be waived by the failure of his counsel to object to it at the time made: "... the failure of an accused's counsel to make such objection or to file such motions will ordinarily constitute an intelligent waiver of the right to appellate review of such types of errors and the evidence upon which they are based...." State v. Spain, 329 So.2d 178, 179 (La. 1976). | 1 | 2 |
Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCanngreen2 sentences1990McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279 , 63 S.Ct. 236, 242 , 87 L.Ed. 268, 275 (1942). 1990McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279 , 63 S.Ct. 236, 242 , 87 L.Ed. 268, 275 (1942). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1990State v. Warren, 536 So.2d 529 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1988); State v. Williams, 521 So.2d 629 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988). 1988See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851, 852 (La.1982); State v. Williams, 521 So.2d 629, 631 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Clarkgreen1 sentence2012State v. Clark, 446 So.2d 293, 297 (La.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Borel v. Younggreen2 sentences2009Although, as I have previously cautioned, once this court has ruled on an issue, we should be extremely reluctant to change our position, as both the legislature and society should be able to rely on the finality of our decisions, Borel v. Young, 07-419, p. 21 (La.11/27/07), 989 So.2d 42, 65 (on reh'g), in this case there is no specific statute addressing the issue and, thus, no legislative pronouncement of which we might run afoul in continued adherence to the jurisprudential rule. 2009Although, as I have previously cautioned, once this court has ruled on an issue, we should be extremely reluctant to change our position, as both the legislature and society should be able to rely on the finality of our decisions, Borel v. Young, 07-419, p. 21 (La.11/27/07), 989 So.2d 42, 65 (on reh’g), in this case there is no specific statute addressing the issue and, thus, no legislative pronouncement of which we might run afoul in continued adherence to the jurisprudential rule. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kinggreen1 sentence1998State v. King, 563 So.2d 449, 453 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 610 (La.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Halsellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Fare v. Michael C.green | 1 | 1 |
| Kitchens v. Smithgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State ex rel. Hall v. Hendersongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Barksdalegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gadsden v. Frippgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Polk v. Minnesota Commissioner of Correctionsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Van Burengreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Benoit
green
2 sentences1990State v. Benoit, 440 So.2d 129 (La.1983). 1985Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Benoit, 440 So.2d 129 (La.1983). | 5 | 1984–1990 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1975In these circumstances an intelligent waiver of constitutional rights cannot be assumed." ( 384 U.S. 436, 496 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1639 , 16 L. 1975In these circumstances an intelligent waiver of constitutional rights cannot be assumed." ( 384 U.S. 436, 496 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1639 , 16 L. | 5 | 1975–1985 |
State v. Hayes
green
2 sentences2002State v. Hayes, 95-1170 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/96) ; 670 So.2d 683 , citing State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La.1980). 2001State v. Hayes, 95-1170 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/96) ; 670 So.2d 683 , citing State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La.1980). | 3 | 1996–2002 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2007State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La. 4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 . 1996State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La.4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 . | 2 | 1996–2007 |
State v. Warren
green
2 sentences2007See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851 (La. 1982); State v. Warren, 536 So.2d 529 (La. 1990State v. Warren, 536 So.2d 529 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1988); State v. Williams, 521 So.2d 629 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988). | 2 | 1990–2007 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2007State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La. 4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 . 1996State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La.4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 . | 2 | 1996–2007 |
State v. Hathaway
green
2 sentences1990State v. Hathaway, 411 So.2d 1074 (La. 1982). *748 The state was not required to negate an exception in the bill of information. 1985State v. Hathaway, 411 So.2d 1074 (La.1982). | 2 | 1985–1990 |
State v. Crosby
green
1 sentence2018State v. Spain , 329 So.2d 178 (La. 1976) ; State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La. 1976) ; State v. Hardy , 39,233 (La. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Reynolds
neutral
1 sentence2015See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851 (La.1982); State v. Reynolds, 45,674 (La.App.2d Cir.11/03/10), 55 So.3d 136 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Carter
green
1 sentence2012What is a “knowing and voluntary waiver” was discussed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Carter, 10-0614, p. 25 (La.1/24/12) 26, 84 So.3d 499 , 520: “[ t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see also State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540, 542 (La.1991)(trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, e | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. White
green
1 sentence2000In State v. White, 98-0343 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/98) , 727 So.2d 574 , the court held that the record did not reflect an intelligent waiver of counsel when defendant entered one of the predicate misdemeanor DWI guilty pleas. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. King
neutral
1 sentence1998State v. King, 563 So.2d 449, 453 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 610 (La.1990). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Wheelwright
green
1 sentence1995In State v. Wheelwright, supra , the defendant pled guilty to a multiple offender bill where the trial judge failed to specifically inform him of his right to remain silent. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1985Domangue argues that the conviction is invalid because he did not make an intelligent waiver of his constitutional rights as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). 1985Domangue argues that the conviction is invalid because he did not make an intelligent waiver of his constitutional rights as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. LeBlanc
green
1 sentence1984NOTES [1] In State v. LeBlanc, 367 So.2d 335 (La.1979), the court pretermitted a ruling on whether the intelligent waiver of La. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
City of Monroe v. Wyrick
green
1 sentence1984In upholding Faretta's right to represent himself, the United States Supreme Court noted that the record affirmatively showed that "Faretta was literate, competent, and understanding, and that he was voluntarily exercising his informed free will." The Supreme Court in Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938), stated, "The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience and conduct of the accused." | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Edwards v. Arizona green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| United States v. Cecil Knox Priest green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| United States v. Edward Junior Clark green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| North Carolina v. Butler red | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| United States v. John Clayton Massey green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| State v. Cusher green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| State v. Warren green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| State v. Bell green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| State v. Jenkins green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| State v. Bizette green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| State v. Massa neutral | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| State v. McGowan neutral | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| United States v. Wade green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Kirby v. Illinois green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| State v. Fairley neutral | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| State v. Scheler green | 1 | 1971–1971 |
| State v. Millsap green | 1 | 1971–1971 |
| State v. Graves neutral | 1 | 1969–1969 |
| Gideon v. Wainwright green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Frank M. Williams v. State of Alabama green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States green | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.