intelligent waiver (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

intelligent waiver in Louisiana

87 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (22)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Mitchellgreen
la · 1982 · cited in 6 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1987–2015
2 sentences

2015See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851 (La.1982); State v. Reynolds, 45,674 (La.App.2d Cir.11/03/10), 55 So.3d 136 .

1988Furthermore, "[i]n proving an intelligent waiver of the rights to silence, self-incrimination, and counsel, the state need not show that defendant was aware of the full evidentiary significance of his statements." See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851, 852 (La.1982).

66
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen
scotus · 1938 · cited in 26 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1969–2019
2 sentences

2016In State v. Carter, supra, the Supreme Court explained what trial courts must consider, when a defendant asserts the right to self-representation: Should a defendant wish to waive counsel and represent himself, “[t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938) ...

2016In State v. Carter, supra, the Supreme Court explained what trial courts must consider, when a defendant asserts the right to self-representation: Should a defendant wish to waive counsel and represent himself, “[t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938) ...

426
State v. Straingreen
la · 1991 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012What is a “knowing and voluntary waiver” was discussed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Carter, 10-0614, p. 25 (La.1/24/12) 26, 84 So.3d 499 , 520: “[ t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see also State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540, 542 (La.1991)(trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, e

2012Should a defendant wish to waive counsel and represent himself, “[t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see also State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540, 542 (La.1991) (trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, education, and mental condition in deciding, on a totality of the circumstances, whether accuse

22
State v. Greengreen
la · 1983 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1995–1996
2 sentences

1996State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984).

1995State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984).

22
State v. Jamesgreen
lactapp · 1984 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1995–1996
2 sentences

1996State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984).

1995State v. Green, 443 So.2d 531, 535 (La.1983); State v. James, 459 So.2d 28, 29-30 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984).

22
State v. Harpergreen
la · 1980 · cited in 23 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1980–2019
2 sentences

2019Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La. 1980).

1986"The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused." Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La.1980).

123
Faretta v. Californiagreen
scotus · 1975 · cited in 7 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1986–2016
2 sentences

2016Further, a defendant ' must be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation so that the record démonstrates that “ ‘he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with his eyes open.’” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 (quoting Adams v. United States ex rel.

2016Further, a defendant ' must be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation so that the record démonstrates that “ ‘he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with his eyes open.’” Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. at 2541 (quoting Adams v. United States ex rel.

17
State v. Carpentergreen
la · 1980 · cited in 5 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–2019
2 sentences

2019Regarding the determination of a defendant’s waiver of counsel, in Carpenter, 390 So.2d at 1298 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows: The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel depends upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.

2002In State v. Carpenter, 390 So.2d 1296 (La.1980), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following law regarding a waiver of defendant's right to counsel: The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel depends upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.

15
State v. Spaingreen
la · 1976 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1982–2018
2 sentences

2018State v. Spain , 329 So.2d 178 (La. 1976) ; State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La. 1976) ; State v. Hardy , 39,233 (La.

1982An accused's right to have a particular trial action reviewed on appeal may be waived by the failure of his counsel to object to it at the time made: "... the failure of an accused's counsel to make such objection or to file such motions will ordinarily constitute an intelligent waiver of the right to appellate review of such types of errors and the evidence upon which they are based...." State v. Spain, 329 So.2d 178, 179 (La. 1976).

12
Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCanngreen
scotus · 1943 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1986–1990
2 sentences

1990McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279 , 63 S.Ct. 236, 242 , 87 L.Ed. 268, 275 (1942).

1990McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279 , 63 S.Ct. 236, 242 , 87 L.Ed. 268, 275 (1942).

12
State v. Williamsgreen
lactapp · 1988 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1988–1990
2 sentences

1990State v. Warren, 536 So.2d 529 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1988); State v. Williams, 521 So.2d 629 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988).

1988See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851, 852 (La.1982); State v. Williams, 521 So.2d 629, 631 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988).

12
State v. Clarkgreen
la · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012State v. Clark, 446 So.2d 293, 297 (La.1984).

11
Borel v. Younggreen
la · 2008 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009Although, as I have previously cautioned, once this court has ruled on an issue, we should be extremely reluctant to change our position, as both the legislature and society should be able to rely on the finality of our decisions, Borel v. Young, 07-419, p. 21 (La.11/27/07), 989 So.2d 42, 65 (on reh'g), in this case there is no specific statute addressing the issue and, thus, no legislative pronouncement of which we might run afoul in continued adherence to the jurisprudential rule.

2009Although, as I have previously cautioned, once this court has ruled on an issue, we should be extremely reluctant to change our position, as both the legislature and society should be able to rely on the finality of our decisions, Borel v. Young, 07-419, p. 21 (La.11/27/07), 989 So.2d 42, 65 (on reh’g), in this case there is no specific statute addressing the issue and, thus, no legislative pronouncement of which we might run afoul in continued adherence to the jurisprudential rule.

11
State v. Kinggreen
lactapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
1 sentence

1998State v. King, 563 So.2d 449, 453 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 610 (La.1990).

11
State v. Halsellgreen
la · 1981 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
11
Fare v. Michael C.green
scotus · 1979 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
11
Kitchens v. Smithgreen
scotus · 1971 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
11
State ex rel. Hall v. Hendersongreen
la · 1975 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
11
State v. Barksdalegreen
la · 1964 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1971–1971
11
Gadsden v. Frippgreen
scotus · 1965 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1971–1971
11
Polk v. Minnesota Commissioner of Correctionsgreen
scotus · 1965 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1971–1971
11
State v. Van Burengreen
sc · 1910 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1971–1971
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (37)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Benoit green
la · 1983
2 sentences

1990State v. Benoit, 440 So.2d 129 (La.1983).

1985Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Benoit, 440 So.2d 129 (La.1983).

51984–1990
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1975In these circumstances an intelligent waiver of constitutional rights cannot be assumed." ( 384 U.S. 436, 496 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1639 , 16 L.

1975In these circumstances an intelligent waiver of constitutional rights cannot be assumed." ( 384 U.S. 436, 496 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1639 , 16 L.

51975–1985
State v. Hayes green
lactapp · 1996
2 sentences

2002State v. Hayes, 95-1170 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/96) ; 670 So.2d 683 , citing State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La.1980).

2001State v. Hayes, 95-1170 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/96) ; 670 So.2d 683 , citing State v. Harper, 381 So.2d 468 (La.1980).

31996–2002
State v. Davis green
lactapp · 1995
2 sentences

2007State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La. 4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 .

1996State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La.4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 .

21996–2007
State v. Warren green
lactapp · 1988
2 sentences

2007See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851 (La. 1982); State v. Warren, 536 So.2d 529 (La.

1990State v. Warren, 536 So.2d 529 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1988); State v. Williams, 521 So.2d 629 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988).

21990–2007
State v. Johnson green
la · 1996
2 sentences

2007State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La. 4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 .

1996State v. Davis, 94-2332, p. 8 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 406 , writ denied, 96-0127 (La.4/19/96), 671 So.2d 925 .

21996–2007
State v. Hathaway green
la · 1982
2 sentences

1990State v. Hathaway, 411 So.2d 1074 (La. 1982). *748 The state was not required to negate an exception in the bill of information.

1985State v. Hathaway, 411 So.2d 1074 (La.1982).

21985–1990
State v. Crosby green
la · 1976
1 sentence

2018State v. Spain , 329 So.2d 178 (La. 1976) ; State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La. 1976) ; State v. Hardy , 39,233 (La.

12018–2018
State v. Reynolds neutral
lactapp · 2010
1 sentence

2015See State v. Mitchell, 421 So.2d 851 (La.1982); State v. Reynolds, 45,674 (La.App.2d Cir.11/03/10), 55 So.3d 136 .

12015–2015
State v. Carter green
la · 2012
1 sentence

2012What is a “knowing and voluntary waiver” was discussed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Carter, 10-0614, p. 25 (La.1/24/12) 26, 84 So.3d 499 , 520: “[ t]he determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see also State v. Strain, 585 So.2d 540, 542 (La.1991)(trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, e

12012–2012
State v. White green
lactapp · 1998
1 sentence

2000In State v. White, 98-0343 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/98) , 727 So.2d 574 , the court held that the record did not reflect an intelligent waiver of counsel when defendant entered one of the predicate misdemeanor DWI guilty pleas.

12000–2000
State v. King neutral
la · 1990
1 sentence

1998State v. King, 563 So.2d 449, 453 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 610 (La.1990).

11998–1998
State v. Wheelwright green
lactapp · 1993
1 sentence

1995In State v. Wheelwright, supra , the defendant pled guilty to a multiple offender bill where the trial judge failed to specifically inform him of his right to remain silent.

11995–1995
Boykin v. Alabama green
scotus · 1969
2 sentences

1985Domangue argues that the conviction is invalid because he did not make an intelligent waiver of his constitutional rights as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).

1985Domangue argues that the conviction is invalid because he did not make an intelligent waiver of his constitutional rights as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).

11985–1985
State v. LeBlanc green
la · 1979
1 sentence

1984NOTES [1] In State v. LeBlanc, 367 So.2d 335 (La.1979), the court pretermitted a ruling on whether the intelligent waiver of La.

11984–1984
City of Monroe v. Wyrick green
la · 1981
1 sentence

1984In upholding Faretta's right to represent himself, the United States Supreme Court noted that the record affirmatively showed that "Faretta was literate, competent, and understanding, and that he was voluntarily exercising his informed free will." The Supreme Court in Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938), stated, "The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience and conduct of the accused."

11984–1984
Edwards v. Arizona green
scotus · 1981
11982–1982
United States v. Cecil Knox Priest green
ca5 · 1969
11982–1982
United States v. Edward Junior Clark green
ca4 · 1974
11982–1982
North Carolina v. Butler red
scotus · 1979
11982–1982
United States v. John Clayton Massey green
ca5 · 1977
11982–1982
State v. Cusher green
la · 1981
11982–1982
State v. Warren green
la · 1981
11982–1982
State v. Bell green
la · 1976
11982–1982
State v. Jenkins green
la · 1976
11979–1979
State v. Bizette green
la · 1976
11979–1979
State v. Massa neutral
kan · 1913
11976–1976
State v. McGowan neutral
la · 1975
11976–1976
United States v. Wade green
scotus · 1967
11974–1974
Kirby v. Illinois green
scotus · 1972
11974–1974
State v. Fairley neutral
la · 1971
11972–1972
State v. Scheler green
la · 1962
11971–1971
State v. Millsap green
la · 1971
11971–1971
State v. Graves neutral
la · 1964
11969–1969
Gideon v. Wainwright green
scotus · 1963
11966–1966
Frank M. Williams v. State of Alabama green
ca5 · 1965
11966–1966
J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States green
scotus · 1928
11942–1942

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:451 (14) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30.1 (9) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:64 (9) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:529.1 (8) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (7) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:438 (7) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30 (6) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:95.1 (6) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:966 (6) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:967 (6) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:27 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:42 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 179 (1947–2026) LA 87 (1942–2019) IL 85 (1948–2026) GA 48 (1971–2026) OH 41 (1944–2026) AR 36 (1956–2021) TX 33 (1968–2025) CT 32 (1968–2016) IN 30 (1969–2020) MD 28 (1964–2008) NY 28 (1955–2018) AL 21 (1965–2018) PA 20 (1941–2021) WA 19 (1963–2022) FL 19 (1964–2014) AZ 18 (1965–2021) SC 18 (1974–2024) WV 18 (1965–2021) MO 14 (1896–2023) CO 13 (1967–2021) MN 13 (1959–2024) RI 12 (1964–2011) NH 11 (1965–2019) MI 11 (1967–2023) MA 11 (1971–2010) NJ 10 (1945–2026) AK 10 (1980–2023) NC 9 (1964–2022) OR 9 (1966–1983) DC 8 (1959–2010) OK 8 (1939–1979) NM 8 (1971–2020) WI 7 (1968–2003) ND 7 (1965–2025) TN 6 (1951–2024) VA 6 (1979–2023) KS 6 (1949–1982) IA 6 (1966–2022) KY 6 (1981–2022) VT 5 (1960–2016) MS 5 (1988–2019) SD 5 (1943–2006) NV 5 (1970–1984) NE 4 (1976–2019) ID 4 (1967–1986) ME 4 (1980–2014) WY 4 (1984–1992) DE 2 (1985–2015) UT 2 (1990–2001) MT 2 (1963–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check