going and coming rule in Arkansas

1995Johnson v. Clark, supra; Bales v. Service Club No. 1, Camp Chaffee, 208 Ark. 692 , 187 S.W.2d 321 (1945).

1995Johnson v. Clark, supra; Bales v. Service Club No. 1, Camp Chaffee, 208 Ark. 692 , 187 S.W.2d 321 (1945).

2004Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. Pettey, 328 Ark. 381 , 944 S.W.2d 524 (1997); Daniels, supra. Thus, the going-and-coming rule ordinarily precludes recovery for an injury sustained while the employee is going to or returning from work.

2004Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. Pettey, 328 Ark. 381 , 944 S.W.2d 524 (1997); Daniels, supra. Thus, the going-and-coming rule ordinarily precludes recovery for an injury sustained while the employee is going to or returning from work.

2014Moncus v. Billingsley Logging, 366 Ark. 383 , 235 S.W.3d 877 (2006).

2014Moncus v. Billingsley Logging, 366 Ark. 383 , 235 S.W.3d 877 (2006).

2005Swearengin, supra (citing Jane Traylor, Inc. v. Cooksey, 31 Ark.App. 245 , 792 S.W.2d 351 (1990)).

2005Swearengin, supra (citing Jane Traylor, Inc. v. Cooksey, 31 Ark.App. 245 , 792 S.W.2d 351 (1990)).

2004Woodard v. White Spot Café, 30 Ark.

1995Woodard v. White Spot Cafe, 30 Ark.

1990Chicot Memorial Hospital v. Veazey, 9 Ark.

1987Chicot Memorial Hospital v. Veazey, 9 Ark.

1960It is appellants’ strong contention that the facts and circumstances of this case bring it squarely within a well recognized exception to the going and coming rule often referred to in decisions by this court and particularly in the case of Blankenship Logging Company v. Brown, 212 Ark. 871 , 208 S. W. 2d 778 .

1960It is appellants’ strong contention that the facts and circumstances of this case bring it squarely within a well recognized exception to the going and coming rule often referred to in decisions by this court and particularly in the case of Blankenship Logging Company v. Brown, 212 Ark. 871 , 208 S. W. 2d 778 .

2025Van Dalsen relied on Frank Lyon Co. v. Oates, 225 Ark. 682, 284 S.W.2d 637 (1955) (a workers’-compensation case specifically addressing the going-and- coming rule), but we rejected its application to a master and servant case such as Van Dalsen’s.

2025Van Dalsen relied on Frank Lyon Co. v. Oates, 225 Ark. 682, 284 S.W.2d 637 (1955) (a workers’-compensation case specifically addressing the going-and- coming rule), but we rejected its application to a master and servant case such as Van Dalsen’s.

2021Foster, a temporary clerical worker, was injured in the service-bay area of McClarty Auto Mall at 7:50 a.m., ten minutes before her official workday began. 31 The Foster opinion noted that she would have been required to perform her specific job duties while en route to her designated job site and was expected to advance her employer’s interests away from her desk, even if Foster had not actually been engaged in work duties when she was injured. 32 The Foster opinion rejected any application of the going and coming rule because Foster was already at the workplace; she was not driving to work n

2021App. 342 , 154 S.W.3d 274 (2004). 30 93 Ark.

2021App. 342 , 154 S.W.3d 274 (2004). 30 93 Ark.

2006Linton v. Arkansas Dep’t of Correction, 87 Ark.

2006Moncus v. Billingsley Logging, 93 Ark.

2004Lepard v. West Memphis Mach. & Welding, 51 Ark.

2001In Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.

2001In Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998), we affirmed the Commission's decision denying benefits for injuries sustained to a worker who tripped over a rolled-up carpet while walking to a designated smoking area.

1995Brooks v. Wage, 242 Ark. 486 , 414 S.W.2d 100 (1967); Johnson v. Clark, 230 Ark. 275 , 322 S.W.2d 72 (1959).

1995Brooks v. Wage, 242 Ark. 486 , 414 S.W.2d 100 (1967); Johnson v. Clark, 230 Ark. 275 , 322 S.W.2d 72 (1959).

1995The court stated, “The employment contemplated [the employee’s] entry upon and departure from the premises as much as it contemplated his working there, and must include a reasonable interval of time for that purpose.” Id., 208 Ark. at 699 (quoting Cudahy Packing Co. v. Parramore, 263 U.S. 418 (1923)).

1995Brooks v. Wage, 242 Ark. 486 , 414 S.W.2d 100 (1967); Johnson v. Clark, 230 Ark. 275 , 322 S.W.2d 72 (1959).

1995Brooks v. Wage, 242 Ark. 486 , 414 S.W.2d 100 (1967); Johnson v. Clark, 230 Ark. 275 , 322 S.W.2d 72 (1959).

1990While we agree with the appellant that this case falls within the premises exception to the going and coming rule, see Davis v. Chemical Construction Co., 232 Ark. 50 , 334 S.W.2d 697 (1960), we think that the appellant was nevertheless required to prove that his injury arose out of his employment.

1990While we agree with the appellant that this case falls within the premises exception to the going and coming rule, see Davis v. Chemical Construction Co., 232 Ark. 50 , 334 S.W.2d 697 (1960), we think that the appellant was nevertheless required to prove that his injury arose out of his employment.

1990In his treatise on workmen’s compensation law, Larson discusses the dual-purpose doctrine as set out by Judge Cardozo in Marks’ Dependents v. Gray, 251 N.Y. 90 , 167 N.E. 181 (1929).

1990In his treatise on workmen’s compensation law, Larson discusses the dual-purpose doctrine as set out by Judge Cardozo in Marks’ Dependents v. Gray, 251 N.Y. 90 , 167 N.E. 181 (1929).

1990The going and coming rule was explained in Fisher v. Proksch, 20 Ark.

1990App. 80 , 723 S.W.2d 852 (1987), as follows: The going and coming rule provides that, since all persons are subject to the same street hazards while traveling, injuries sustained by employees going to and coming from work cannot ordinarily be said to arise out of and in the course of the employment within the meaning of the workers’ compensation law.

1976See Larson, Workmen’s Compensation, § 18.10 et. seq. (1972); Blankinship Logging Co. v. Brown, 212 Ark. 871 , 208 S.W. 2d 778 (1948); and Hunter v. Summerville, 205 Ark. 463 , 169 S.W. 2d 579 (1943).

1976See Larson, Workmen’s Compensation, § 18.10 et. seq. (1972); Blankinship Logging Co. v. Brown, 212 Ark. 871 , 208 S.W. 2d 778 (1948); and Hunter v. Summerville, 205 Ark. 463 , 169 S.W. 2d 579 (1943).