25 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Vitalegreen2 sentences1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 | 3 | 8 |
Blockburger v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1991The initial test to be applied, commonly known as the Blockburger standard, focuses upon the statutory elements and requires inquiry into "whether *519 each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not." State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. at 103 , 527 A. 2d 1355 , quoting Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. at 182 , 76 L.Ed. at 309 . 1991The initial test to be applied, commonly known as the Blockburger standard, focuses upon the statutory elements and requires inquiry into "whether *519 each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not." State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. at 103 , 527 A. 2d 1355 , quoting Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. at 182 , 76 L.Ed. at 309 . | 2 | 9 |
Brown v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2017See Dively, supra, 92 N.J. at 579-82 , 458 A.2d 502 ; see also Brown, supra, 432 U.S. at 166 n.6, 97 S.Ct. at 2226 n.6, 53 L.Ed.2d at 195 n.6 (“The Blockburger test is not the only standard for determining whether successive prosecutions impermissibly involve the same offense.”). 2017See Dively, supra, 92 N.J. at 579-82 , 458 A.2d 502 ; see also Brown, supra, 432 U.S. at 166 n.6, 97 S.Ct. at 2226 n.6, 53 L.Ed.2d at 195 n.6 (“The Blockburger test is not the only standard for determining whether successive prosecutions impermissibly involve the same offense.”). | 2 | 5 |
Grady v. Corbinred2 sentences1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 | 2 | 3 |
State v. Gregorygreen2 sentences1983Cf. State v. Gregory, 66 N.J. 510, 521 (1975) (advocating compulsory joinder and endorsing Justice Proctor’s comments in State v. Bell, 55 N.J. 239, 243 (1960), that many of the difficulties in the double jeopardy area “would be eliminated if all charges against a defendant were disposed of in a single trial rather than by piecemeal litigation”). 6 The Appellate Division incorrectly applied the Blockburger test in State v. Di Ventura, 187 N.J.Super. 165, 171 (1982), certif. denied, 92 N.J.-(1983), when it misstated the test to be whether there was “an additional element in one offense not pres 1983Cf. State v. Gregory, 66 N.J. 510, 521 (1975) (advocating compulsory joinder and endorsing Justice Proctor’s comments in State v. Bell, 55 N.J. 239, 243 (1960), that many of the difficulties in the double jeopardy area “would be eliminated if all charges against a defendant were disposed of in a single trial rather than by piecemeal litigation”). 6 The Appellate Division incorrectly applied the Blockburger test in State v. Di Ventura, 187 N.J.Super. 165, 171 (1982), certif. denied, 92 N.J.-(1983), when it misstated the test to be whether there was “an additional element in one offense not pres | 2 | 2 |
Garrett v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1991The Court observed, however, that "[t]he Blockburger test was developed `in the context of multiple punishments imposed in a single prosecution.'" Ibid., quoting Garrett v. United States, 471 U.S. 773, 778 , 105 S.Ct. 2407, 2411 , 85 L.Ed. 2d 764, 771 (1985). 1991The Court observed, however, that "[t]he Blockburger test was developed `in the context of multiple punishments imposed in a single prosecution.'" Ibid., quoting Garrett v. United States, 471 U.S. 773, 778 , 105 S.Ct. 2407, 2411 , 85 L.Ed. 2d 764, 771 (1985). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Calvaccagreen2 sentences1989See State v. Calvacca, supra, 199 N.J. 1989See State v. Calvacca, supra, 199 N.J. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Divelygreen2 sentences2017See Dively, supra, 92 N.J. at 579-82 , 458 A.2d 502 ; see also Brown, supra, 432 U.S. at 166 n.6, 97 S.Ct. at 2226 n.6, 53 L.Ed.2d at 195 n.6 (“The Blockburger test is not the only standard for determining whether successive prosecutions impermissibly involve the same offense.”). 2017See Dively, supra, 92 N.J. at 579-82 , 458 A.2d 502 ; see also Brown, supra, 432 U.S. at 166 n.6, 97 S.Ct. at 2226 n.6, 53 L.Ed.2d at 195 n.6 (“The Blockburger test is not the only standard for determining whether successive prosecutions impermissibly involve the same offense.”). | 1 | 5 |
State v. Trugliagreen2 sentences1988But see e.g., State v. Truglia, 97 N.J. 513, 520 (1984) where the State argued that the Code of Criminal Justice "adopted the Blockburger test" in a case involving disposition by simultaneous pleas. 1988But see e.g., State v. Truglia, 97 N.J. 513, 520 (1984) where the State argued that the Code of Criminal Justice "adopted the Blockburger test" in a case involving disposition by simultaneous pleas. | 1 | 4 |
United States v. Dixongreen2 sentences2019Id. at 700-02, 113 S.Ct. 2849 . 2019Id. at 700-02, 113 S.Ct. 2849 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Dillihaygreen2 sentences2009After concluding that it was unclear whether the Legislature contemplated multiple punishments for the two offenses, or whether instead the Legislature sought merely to prohibit merger for sentencing purposes in order to preserve the mandatory parole ineligibility period for school-zone offenses, id. at 49-50 , 601 A. 2d 1149 , the Court proceeded to an application of the Blockburger test. 2009After concluding that it was unclear whether the Legislature contemplated multiple punishments for the two offenses, or whether instead the Legislature sought merely to prohibit merger for sentencing purposes in order to preserve the mandatory parole ineligibility period for school-zone offenses, id. at 49-50 , 601 A. 2d 1149 , the Court proceeded to an application of the Blockburger test. | 1 | 3 |
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences1988We need not address this question given the "flexible approach" with respect to merger recognized by our Supreme Court in State v. Davis, 68 N.J. 69, 81 (1975) and State v. Truglia, supra . 1988We need not address this question given the "flexible approach" with respect to merger recognized by our Supreme Court in State v. Davis, 68 N.J. 69, 81 (1975) and State v. Truglia, supra . | 1 | 3 |
Iannelli v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1991The Blockburger test is satisfied if each offense requires proof of a fact that the other does not, notwithstanding substantial overlap in the evidence presented. 108 N.J. at 103 , 527 A. 2d 1355 ; see also Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1977); Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed. 2d 616 (1975). 1991The Blockburger test is satisfied if each offense requires proof of a fact that the other does not, notwithstanding substantial overlap in the evidence presented. 108 N.J. at 103 , 527 A. 2d 1355 ; see also Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1977); Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed. 2d 616 (1975). | 1 | 2 |
Whalen v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1989In this regard, Blockburger states that [t]he applicable rule is that, where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not. [ 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. at 182 , 76 L.Ed. at 309 .] The assumption underlying the Blockburger test is that the Legislature "ordinarily does not intend to punish the same offense under two different statutes." Whalen, supra, 445 U.S. at 691-92 , 100 S.Ct. at 14 1989In this regard, Blockburger states that [t]he applicable rule is that, where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not. [ 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. at 182 , 76 L.Ed. at 309 .] The assumption underlying the Blockburger test is that the Legislature "ordinarily does not intend to punish the same offense under two different statutes." Whalen, supra, 445 U.S. at 691-92 , 100 S.Ct. at 14 | 1 | 2 |
State v. Miraultgreen2 sentences1986However, the court did indicate that the Blockburger test "may suffer from a certain sterility," 97 N.J. at 521 , and that the court has found it "more comfortable in recent years to eschew the `mechanical application of formulas' to resolve merger questions, [ State v. *341 Mirault, 92 N.J. 492 (1982)] at 501, and to resort to the flexible approach of Davis . " 97 N.J. at 521 . [3] While counts 1 and 2 and counts 3 and 4 of indictment 347-3-84 allege different dates for the issuance of the checks and the resulting thefts, a review of the factual basis at the time of plea, the presentence repo 1986However, the court did indicate that the Blockburger test "may suffer from a certain sterility," 97 N.J. at 521 , and that the court has found it "more comfortable in recent years to eschew the `mechanical application of formulas' to resolve merger questions, [ State v. *341 Mirault, 92 N.J. 492 (1982)] at 501, and to resort to the flexible approach of Davis . " 97 N.J. at 521 . [3] While counts 1 and 2 and counts 3 and 4 of indictment 347-3-84 allege different dates for the issuance of the checks and the resulting thefts, a review of the factual basis at the time of plea, the presentence repo | 1 | 2 |
Morey v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Munizgreen2 sentences1994See also State v. Muniz, 118 N.J. 319 , 571 A. 2d 948 (1990). 1994See also State v. Muniz, 118 N.J. 319 , 571 A. 2d 948 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Colombo v. New Yorkgreen2 sentences1991See State v. Thompson, 659 P. 2d at 386 ; see also Colombo v. New York, 405 U.S. 9 , 92 S.Ct. 756 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 762 (1972); People v. Gray, 12 Ill.Dec. at 889 , 370 N.E. 2d at 800 . 1991See State v. Thompson, 659 P. 2d at 386 ; see also Colombo v. New York, 405 U.S. 9 , 92 S.Ct. 756 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 762 (1972); People v. Gray, 12 Ill.Dec. at 889 , 370 N.E. 2d at 800 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thompsongreen2 sentences1991See State v. Thompson, 659 P. 2d at 386 ; see also Colombo v. New York, 405 U.S. 9 , 92 S.Ct. 756 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 762 (1972); People v. Gray, 12 Ill.Dec. at 889 , 370 N.E. 2d at 800 . 1991See State v. Thompson, 659 P. 2d at 386 ; see also Colombo v. New York, 405 U.S. 9 , 92 S.Ct. 756 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 762 (1972); People v. Gray, 12 Ill.Dec. at 889 , 370 N.E. 2d at 800 . | 1 | 1 |
Albernaz v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1989Garrett v. United States, 471 U.S. 773, 779 , 105 S.Ct. 2407, 2411 , 85 L.Ed. 2d 764, 771 (1985); Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 340 , 101 S.Ct. 1137, 1143 , 67 L.Ed. 2d at 275, 282 . 1989Garrett v. United States, 471 U.S. 773, 779 , 105 S.Ct. 2407, 2411 , 85 L.Ed. 2d 764, 771 (1985); Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 340 , 101 S.Ct. 1137, 1143 , 67 L.Ed. 2d at 275, 282 . | 1 | 1 |
Missouri v. Huntergreen2 sentences1989However, in Missouri v. Hunter, the Supreme *189 Court stated that the Blockburger test is applicable only when the legislature has not indicated its intent that a defendant should be convicted of both offenses. 459 U.S. 359, 366-67 , 103 S.Ct. 673, 678-79 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 535, 542-43 (1983), citing Whalen v. United States, 445 U.S. 684, 691-93 , 100 S.Ct. 1432, 1437-39 , 63 L.Ed. 2d 715, 723-25 (1980). 1989However, in Missouri v. Hunter, the Supreme *189 Court stated that the Blockburger test is applicable only when the legislature has not indicated its intent that a defendant should be convicted of both offenses. 459 U.S. 359, 366-67 , 103 S.Ct. 673, 678-79 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 535, 542-43 (1983), citing Whalen v. United States, 445 U.S. 684, 691-93 , 100 S.Ct. 1432, 1437-39 , 63 L.Ed. 2d 715, 723-25 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
| William H. Fuller v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Raymond Pandelli v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Stanley L. Davis v. Robert Herring, Sheriff of Lee County, Mississippi and Edwin L. Pittman, Attorney General of the State of Mississippigreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Grampusgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Jacksongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Carter v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Fractiongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Goodmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Bellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Di Venturagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Trugliagreen2 sentences1988But see e.g., State v. Truglia, 97 N.J. 513, 520 (1984) where the State argued that the Code of Criminal Justice "adopted the Blockburger test" in a case involving disposition by simultaneous pleas. 1988But see e.g., State v. Truglia, 97 N.J. 513, 520 (1984) where the State argued that the Code of Criminal Justice "adopted the Blockburger test" in a case involving disposition by simultaneous pleas. | 1 | 4 |
Grady v. Corbinred2 sentences1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 1994Thus we stated that if "`each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not,' Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871)," the offenses are not the same under the Blockburger test. [ Illinois v. Vitale, supra, 447 U.S. at 416 , 100 S.Ct. at 2265 , 65 L.Ed. 2d at 235 .] Grady held "that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." Grady, supra, 495 U.S. at 510 | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. DeLuca
green
2 sentences1991The initial test to be applied, commonly known as the Blockburger standard, focuses upon the statutory elements and requires inquiry into "whether *519 each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not." State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. at 103 , 527 A. 2d 1355 , quoting Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. at 182 , 76 L.Ed. at 309 . 1991The initial test to be applied, commonly known as the Blockburger standard, focuses upon the statutory elements and requires inquiry into "whether *519 each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not." State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. at 103 , 527 A. 2d 1355 , quoting Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. at 182 , 76 L.Ed. at 309 . | 4 | 1987–1991 |
State v. Best
green
2 sentences1984He relies as well on State v. Dively, 92 N.J. 573 (1983), which he says gives this Court’s approval to the Blockburger test; State v. Mirault, 92 N.J. 492 (1982), with its emphasis on the absence of separation in time to show that two separate offenses occurred, id. at 503 , as defendant contends is likewise lacking in this case; and State v. Best, 70 N.J. 56 (1976), which Truglia says compels merger when both offenses are committed at the same time and place, again as he argues for here. 1984He relies as well on State v. Dively, 92 N.J. 573 (1983), which he says gives this Court’s approval to the Blockburger test; State v. Mirault, 92 N.J. 492 (1982), with its emphasis on the absence of separation in time to show that two separate offenses occurred, id. at 503 , as defendant contends is likewise lacking in this case; and State v. Best, 70 N.J. 56 (1976), which Truglia says compels merger when both offenses are committed at the same time and place, again as he argues for here. | 2 | 1982–1984 |
State v. Yoskowitz
green
2 sentences2017This language “created controversy among state and federal courts over whether the traditional Blockburger test ha[d] been expanded.” Yoskowitz, supra, 116 N.J. at 690 . 2017This language “created controversy among state and federal courts over whether the traditional Blockburger test ha[d] been expanded.” Yoskowitz, supra, 116 N.J. at 690 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Fex v. Michigan
green
1 sentence2015Dixon, supra, 509 U.S. at 703-12 , 113 S. Ct. 18 A-2692-12T1 2859-64, 125 L. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Parker
green
2 sentences2001Under the Blockburger test, "the court must 'determine whether the defendant is unconstitutionally faced with multiple punishment for the ‘same’ offense.’ ” State v. Parker, 335 N.J.Super. 415, 422 , 762 A.2d 690 , (App.Div.2000) (quoting State v. Maldonado, 137 N.J. 536, 580 , 645 A.2d 1165 (1994) (quoting Dillihay, supra, 127 N.J. at 47-48 , 601 A.2d 1149 )). 2001Under the Blockburger test, "the court must 'determine whether the defendant is unconstitutionally faced with multiple punishment for the ‘same’ offense.’ ” State v. Parker, 335 N.J.Super. 415, 422 , 762 A.2d 690 , (App.Div.2000) (quoting State v. Maldonado, 137 N.J. 536, 580 , 645 A.2d 1165 (1994) (quoting Dillihay, supra, 127 N.J. at 47-48 , 601 A.2d 1149 )). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Maldonado
green
2 sentences2001Thus, Section 5 should be construed and understood to require imposition of Section 7’s mandatory minimum term as part of the sentence imposed on any defendant convicted of a second-degree Section 5 offense and a related Section 7 offense; in respect of first-degree Section 5 convictions, the statute expressly provides for a mandatory minimum sentence. [ Id at 55, 601 A.2d 1149 .] The Court also addressed a similar merger provision in State v. Maldonado, 137 N.J. 536 , 645 A.2d 1165 (1994), and concluded that multiple convictions and sentences for Section 7 and drug-death violations, N.J.S.A. 2001Thus, Section 5 should be construed and understood to require imposition of Section 7’s mandatory minimum term as part of the sentence imposed on any defendant convicted of a second-degree Section 5 offense and a related Section 7 offense; in respect of first-degree Section 5 convictions, the statute expressly provides for a mandatory minimum sentence. [ Id at 55, 601 A.2d 1149 .] The Court also addressed a similar merger provision in State v. Maldonado, 137 N.J. 536 , 645 A.2d 1165 (1994), and concluded that multiple convictions and sentences for Section 7 and drug-death violations, N.J.S.A. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Churchdale Leasing, Inc.
green
2 sentences1992Cf. Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410, 419-20 , 100 S.Ct. 2260, 2267 , 65 L.Ed.2d 228, 237-38 (1980) (double jeopardy bars subsequent prosecution if one offense is always a necessary element of the other); Churchdale Leasing, supra, 115 N.J. at 106-07 , 557 A.2d 277 (multiple punishment violates double jeopardy when the evidence that proves one offense necessarily establishes the other); Dively, supra, 92 N.J. at 582-83 , 458 A.2d 502 (double jeopardy bars multiple convictions when evidence that proves one offense also establishes the other). 1992Cf. Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410, 419-20 , 100 S.Ct. 2260, 2267 , 65 L.Ed.2d 228, 237-38 (1980) (double jeopardy bars subsequent prosecution if one offense is always a necessary element of the other); Churchdale Leasing, supra, 115 N.J. at 106-07 , 557 A.2d 277 (multiple punishment violates double jeopardy when the evidence that proves one offense necessarily establishes the other); Dively, supra, 92 N.J. at 582-83 , 458 A.2d 502 (double jeopardy bars multiple convictions when evidence that proves one offense also establishes the other). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Gray
green
2 sentences1991See State v. Thompson, 659 P. 2d at 386 ; see also Colombo v. New York, 405 U.S. 9 , 92 S.Ct. 756 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 762 (1972); People v. Gray, 12 Ill.Dec. at 889 , 370 N.E. 2d at 800 . 1991See State v. Thompson, 659 P. 2d at 386 ; see also Colombo v. New York, 405 U.S. 9 , 92 S.Ct. 756 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 762 (1972); People v. Gray, 12 Ill.Dec. at 889 , 370 N.E. 2d at 800 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Stanek v. Civil Service Commission of Pittsburgh green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Robinson v. Secretary of Transportation
green
2 sentences1988In State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98,109 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987), we noted that Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410 , 100 S.Ct. 2260 , 65 L.Ed.2d 228 (1980), had modified the Blockburger test of elements of the offense “to make less abstract the comparison of the elements of the two offenses.” We believe that similar reasoning should in *300 form our understanding of the definitions of a lesser-included offense in our Code of Criminal Justice. 1988In State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98,109 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987), we noted that Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410 , 100 S.Ct. 2260 , 65 L.Ed.2d 228 (1980), had modified the Blockburger test of elements of the offense “to make less abstract the comparison of the elements of the two offenses.” We believe that similar reasoning should in *300 form our understanding of the definitions of a lesser-included offense in our Code of Criminal Justice. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Wyoming Community Development Authority v. Durning green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Turner neutral | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.