158 New York opinions name it 16 courts 1876–2025 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cole v. Comfortgreen2 sentences2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). 2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). | 3 | 3 |
Matter of Anumahgreen2 sentences2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). 2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). | 3 | 3 |
Krug v. Kruggreen2 sentences2013Moreover, “a court’s determination regarding custody and visitation issues, based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record,” i.e., is not “supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record” (Matter of Krug v Krug, 55 AD3d 1373, 1374 [2008]). 2013Moreover, “a court’s determination regarding custody and visitation issues, based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record,” i.e., is not “supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record” (Matter of Krug v Krug, 55 AD3d 1373, 1374 [2008]). | 2 | 3 |
Ruple v. Harkenreadergreen2 sentences2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). 2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). | 2 | 3 |
Conklin v. Hernandezgreen2 sentences2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). 2013With respect to the analysis of the best interests of the child in the absence of any presumption, we note that visitation “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” (Matter of Ruple v Harkenreader, 99 AD3d 1085, 1087 [2012]; see Matter of Cole v Comfort, 63 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 706 [2009]; Matter of Conklin v Hernandez, 41 AD3d 908, 910 [2007]). | 2 | 3 |
Smith v. Starkgreen2 sentences1997Co., 184 AD2d 841, 843-844 ; see also, Smith v Stark, 67 NY2d 693, 694 ; Van Buskirk v Migliorelli, 185 AD2d 587, 590 ). 1992Moreover, inasmuch as a warning would not have given plaintiff any better knowledge of the table saw’s danger than he had already acquired through his prior use of the machine or than was "readily discernible” from observation of the unguarded blade, the absence of any warning could not have proximately caused plaintiff’s injuries (see, Smith v Stark, 67 NY2d 693, 694 ; Belling v Haugh’s Pools, 126 AD2d 958, 959 , lv denied 70 NY2d 602 ; see also, Koester v State of New York, 90 AD2d 357, 362 ; cf., Cover v Cohen, 61 NY2d 261 ). | 2 | 3 |
Nestor v. McDowellgreen2 sentences2024Corp. v Kalish , 22 Misc 3d 130 [A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50127[U] [App Term, 1st Dept [*4]2009] ["In the absence of any claim or showing that tenant's alleged [conduct] in any way affected other building residents, landlord failed to state an actionable claim for nuisance (internal citation omitted)."]) In Nestor v McDowell , 81 NY2d 410, 413 (1993), the lower court and the Appellate Division held that the installation of a washing machine in violation of the lease amounted to curable conduct under RPAPL 753 (4). 2024Corp. v Kalish , 22 Misc 3d 130 [A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50127[U] [App Term, 1st Dept [*4]2009] ["In the absence of any claim or showing that tenant's alleged [conduct] in any way affected other building residents, landlord failed to state an actionable claim for nuisance (internal citation omitted)."]) In Nestor v McDowell , 81 NY2d 410, 413 (1993), the lower court and the Appellate Division held that the installation of a washing machine in violation of the lease amounted to curable conduct under RPAPL 753 (4). | 2 | 2 |
Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. Walkleygreen2 sentences2022For example, the Court of Appeals found a milk producer had standing to challenge a competitor's license to sell milk, because no other party could claim to be harmed and the absence of any challenge would undermine the statute's purpose of maintaining healthy competition ( Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley , 38 NY2d 6, 11-12 [1975]). [FN11] What it does not do is obviate the need for standing, especially here. 2022For example, the Court of Appeals found a milk producer had standing to challenge a competitor's license to sell milk, because no other party could claim to be harmed and the absence of any challenge would undermine the statute's purpose of maintaining healthy competition ( Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley , 38 NY2d 6, 11-12 [1975]). [FN2] What it does not do is obviate the need for standing, especially here. | 2 | 2 |
Snowden v. New York City Transit Authoritygreen2 sentences2017Auth., 248 AD2d 235, 237 [1st Dept 1998]). 2017Auth. , 248 AD2d 235, 237 [1st Dept 1998]). | 2 | 2 |
Ruzas v. Goordgreen2 sentences2017Significantly, the record discloses a lack of compliance with the regulations governing the procedures to be followed in testing the substance and in using the test results (see 7 NYCRR 1010.4, 1010.5), as well as the absence of any hearing testimony concerning the testing procedures that were actually followed (see Matter of Hernandez v Selsky, 306 AD2d 595, 596 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 514 [2003]; Matter of Ruzas v Goord, 268 AD2d 742, 743-744 [2000]). 2017Significantly, the record discloses a lack of compliance with the regulations governing the procedures to be followed in testing the substance and in using the test results (see 7 NYCRR 1010.4, 1010.5), as well as the absence of any hearing testimony concerning the testing procedures that were actually followed (see Matter of Hernandez v Selsky, 306 AD2d 595, 596 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 514 [2003]; Matter of Ruzas v Goord, 268 AD2d 742, 743-744 [2000]). | 2 | 2 |
Gonzalez v. Goordgreen2 sentences2017Significantly, the record discloses a lack of compliance with the regulations governing the procedures to be followed in testing the substance and in using the test results (see 7 NYCRR 1010.4, 1010.5), as well as the absence of any hearing testimony concerning the testing procedures that were actually followed (see Matter of Hernandez v Selsky, 306 AD2d 595, 596 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 514 [2003]; Matter of Ruzas v Goord, 268 AD2d 742, 743-744 [2000]). 2017Significantly, the record discloses a lack of compliance with the regulations governing the procedures to be followed in testing the substance and in using the test results (see 7 NYCRR 1010.4, 1010.5), as well as the absence of any hearing testimony concerning the testing procedures that were actually followed (see Matter of Hernandez v Selsky, 306 AD2d 595, 596 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 514 [2003]; Matter of Ruzas v Goord, 268 AD2d 742, 743-744 [2000]). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Cross v. Annuccigreen2 sentences2017Moreover, the prohibition on contraband depends on whether or not an item is authorized (see 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xiii]); since the substance at issue was not adequately identified, substantial evidence does not support the determination that the substance was unauthorized and, therefore, contraband (see Matter of Cross v Annucci, 131 AD3d 758, 759 [2015]). 2017Moreover, the prohibition on contraband depends on whether or not an item is authorized (see 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xiii]); since the substance at issue was not adequately identified, substantial evidence does not support the determination that the substance was unauthorized and, therefore, contraband (see Matter of Cross v Annucci, 131 AD3d 758, 759 [2015]). | 2 | 2 |
FMC Corp. v. Unmackgreen2 sentences2013Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d at 188) and that deference to the court’s painstaking factual determinations regarding valuation is appropriate in the absence of any error of law and in view of the weight of extensive credible evidence supporting its analysis (see Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York, 8 NY3d at 595-596 ; Matter of General Elec. 2013Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d at 188) and that deference to the court’s painstaking factual determinations regarding valuation is appropriate in the absence of any error of law and in view of the weight of extensive credible evidence supporting its analysis (see Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York, 8 NY3d at 595-596 ; Matter of General Elec. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Rousegreen2 sentences2012Upon review of the remaining factors — in particular, the absence of any claim of prejudice or significant delay caused by the People — we find no constitutional injury (see People v Rogers, 8 AD3d 888, 889-890 [2004]; People v Rouse, 4 AD3d 553, 556 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004]). 2012Upon review of the remaining factors — in particular, the absence of any claim of prejudice or significant delay caused by the People — we find no constitutional injury (see People v Rogers, 8 AD3d 888, 889-890 [2004]; People v Rouse, 4 AD3d 553, 556 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004]). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Rogersgreen2 sentences2012Upon review of the remaining factors — in particular, the absence of any claim of prejudice or significant delay caused by the People — we find no constitutional injury (see People v Rogers, 8 AD3d 888, 889-890 [2004]; People v Rouse, 4 AD3d 553, 556 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004]). 2012Upon review of the remaining factors — in particular, the absence of any claim of prejudice or significant delay caused by the People — we find no constitutional injury (see People v Rogers, 8 AD3d 888, 889-890 [2004]; People v Rouse, 4 AD3d 553, 556 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004]). | 2 | 2 |
Compass Insurance Co. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.green2 sentences2004Co. v Cravens, Dargan & Co., 748 P2d 724, 728 [Wyo 1988] [where rules and regulations provided that the insured was responsible for the cleanup of the discharged oil, insured had the legal liability to clean up the oil spill despite the absence of any claim against the insured, and insured is obligated to pay for “these damages”; however, policy to pay for damage to property of others did not cover clean-up costs incurred on insured’s property]). 2004Co. v Cravens, Dargan & Co. , 748 P2d 724, 728 [Wyo 1988] [where rules and regulations provided that the insured was responsible for the cleanup of the discharged oil, insured had the legal liability to clean up the oil spill despite the absence of any claim against the insured, and insured is obligated to pay for "these damages"; however, policy to pay for damage to property of others did not cover clean-up costs incurred on insured's property]). | 2 | 2 |
| Fisher v. Charter Oak Life Insurancegreen | 1 | 2 |
| Herman v. 818 Woodward, LLCgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Charchan v. Wilkinsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Miller v. Almquistgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Jones v. Venettozzigreen | 1 | 1 |
| Claim of Dingman v. General Fibre Box Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Truman v. Venettozzigreen | 1 | 1 |
| McCaskell v. Rodriguezgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Whitlockgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Vieweggreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Algergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gravlin v. Ruppertgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Zibell v. Zibellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hoyle v. Hoylegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Malone v. Malonegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Boden v. Bodengreen | 1 | 1 |
| Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLPgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Corby v. Citibankgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Enrique D.green | 1 | 1 |
| Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v. City of New Yorkgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People ex rel. Hoffman v. Vincentgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hascup v. Willigesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Knapek v. MV Southwest Capegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Saha v. Recordgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Booker
neutral
2 sentences2014However, the People had no reason to do so in the absence of any challenge from defendant (see People v Booker, 301 AD2d 477 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 592 [2003]). 2014However, the People had no reason to do so in the absence of any challenge from defendant (see People v Booker, 301 AD2d 477 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 592 [2003]). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
General Electric Co. v. Assessor
green
2 sentences2013Co. v Assessor of Town of Rotterdam, 54 AD3d at 472 ). 2013Co. v Assessor of Town of Rotterdam, 54 AD3d at 472 ). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. City of New York
green
2 sentences2013Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d at 188) and that deference to the court’s painstaking factual determinations regarding valuation is appropriate in the absence of any error of law and in view of the weight of extensive credible evidence supporting its analysis (see Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York, 8 NY3d at 595-596 ; Matter of General Elec. 2013Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d at 188) and that deference to the court’s painstaking factual determinations regarding valuation is appropriate in the absence of any error of law and in view of the weight of extensive credible evidence supporting its analysis (see Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York, 8 NY3d at 595-596 ; Matter of General Elec. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
New York State Crime Victims Board v. Harris
green
2 sentences2012Indeed, given that “the Legislature went to great lengths to provide avenues to allow crime victims to be compensated for their losses” (Matter of New York State Crime Victims Bd. v Harris, 68 AD3d at 1271 ), the absence of any exception in the statute for public employee pensions evinces the Legislature’s intent to supersede the bar in Retirement and Social Security Law § 110. 2012Indeed, given that “the Legislature went to great lengths to provide avenues to allow crime victims to be compensated for their losses” (Matter of New York State Crime Victims Bd. v Harris, 68 AD3d at 1271 ), the absence of any exception in the statute for public employee pensions evinces the Legislature’s intent to supersede the bar in Retirement and Social Security Law § 110. | 2 | 2012–2012 |
People v. Quinones
green
2 sentences2012Upon review of the remaining factors — in particular, the absence of any claim of prejudice or significant delay caused by the People — we find no constitutional injury (see People v Rogers, 8 AD3d 888, 889-890 [2004]; People v Rouse, 4 AD3d 553, 556 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004]). 2012Upon review of the remaining factors — in particular, the absence of any claim of prejudice or significant delay caused by the People — we find no constitutional injury (see People v Rogers, 8 AD3d 888, 889-890 [2004]; People v Rouse, 4 AD3d 553, 556 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004]). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Baptiste v. Northfield Foundry & Machine Co.
green
2 sentences1997Co., 184 AD2d 841, 843-844 ; see also, Smith v Stark, 67 NY2d 693, 694 ; Van Buskirk v Migliorelli, 185 AD2d 587, 590 ). 1992Co., 184 AD2d 841, 843-844 ; see, Smith v Stark, 67 NY2d 693, 694 ). | 2 | 1992–1997 |
Robles v. Grace Episcopal Church
green
2 sentences1996In view of the relatively short period of delay involved, the absence of any claim of prejudice to the plaintiffs, the existence of a possible meritorious defense, the absence of any willfulness on the defendant’s part, and the public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, the defendant’s motion to vacate its default was properly granted (see, Pollizotto v Ultra Express Coach, 220 AD2d 568 ; Robles v Grace Episcopal Church, 192 AD2d 515 ). 1995In view of the relatively short period of delay, the absence of any claim of prejudice to the plaintiffs, the existence of a possible meritorious defense, the absence of any willfulness on the defendant’s part, and the public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, the defendant’s motion to vacate its default was properly granted (see, Robles v Grace Episcopal Church, 192 AD2d 515 ). | 2 | 1995–1996 |
Five Platters, Inc. v. Williams
green
2 sentences1990(Florio v Cook, 48 NY2d 792 [1979]; Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442 [1978]; Five Platters v Williams, 81 AD2d 534 [1st Dept 1981], appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 752 .) Finally, as to the claim against Jewelle Bickford, there is no evidence that the words were published and she is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. 1990(Florio v Cook, 48 NY2d 792 [1979]; Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442 [1978]; Five Platters v Williams, 81 AD2d 534 [1st Dept 1981], appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 752 .) Finally, as to the claim against Jewelle Bickford, there is no evidence that the words were published and this constitutes an additional reason for granting summary judgment to her. | 2 | 1990–1990 |
Florio v. Cook
green
2 sentences1990(Florio v Cook, 48 NY2d 792 [1979]; Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442 [1978]; Five Platters v Williams, 81 AD2d 534 [1st Dept 1981], appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 752 .) Finally, as to the claim against Jewelle Bickford, there is no evidence that the words were published and she is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. 1990(Florio v Cook, 48 NY2d 792 [1979]; Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442 [1978]; Five Platters v Williams, 81 AD2d 534 [1st Dept 1981], appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 752 .) Finally, as to the claim against Jewelle Bickford, there is no evidence that the words were published and this constitutes an additional reason for granting summary judgment to her. | 2 | 1990–1990 |
People ex rel. Whitaker v. LeFevre
green
2 sentences1990(Florio v Cook, 48 NY2d 792 [1979]; Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442 [1978]; Five Platters v Williams, 81 AD2d 534 [1st Dept 1981], appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 752 .) Finally, as to the claim against Jewelle Bickford, there is no evidence that the words were published and she is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. 1990(Florio v Cook, 48 NY2d 792 [1979]; Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442 [1978]; Five Platters v Williams, 81 AD2d 534 [1st Dept 1981], appeal dismissed 54 NY2d 752 .) Finally, as to the claim against Jewelle Bickford, there is no evidence that the words were published and this constitutes an additional reason for granting summary judgment to her. | 2 | 1990–1990 |
McNeill v. Lasala
green
2 sentences1988In view of the relatively short period of the delay, the absence of any claim of prejudice to the plaintiff, the existence of a possible meritorious defense, the absence of any willfulness on the appellants’ part and the public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, the Supreme Court should have denied the cross motion and granted the appellants leave to file late answers (see, McNeill v LaSala, 115 AD2d 459 ). 1988In view of the relatively short period of the delay, the absence of any claim of prejudice to the plaintiff, the existence of a possible meritorious defense, the absence of any willfulness on the appellants’ part and the public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, the Supreme Court should have denied the cross motion and granted the appellants leave to file late answers (see, McNeill v Lasala, 115 AD2d 459 ). | 2 | 1988–1988 |
Western New York Life Insurance v. Clinton
green
2 sentences1965Co. v. Clinton ( 66 N. Y. 326 ) a bond was issued conditioned on the appointment of the principal Clinton, as agent of the plaintiff, to procure life insurance, collect premiums and pay to the plaintiff all money belonging to it. 1959Co. v. Clinton ( 66 N. Y. 326 ) a bond was issued conditioned on the appointment of the principal Clinton, as agent of the plaintiff, to procure life insurance, collect premiums and pay to the plaintiff all money belonging to it. | 2 | 1959–1965 |
Ruckstuhl v. Healy
neutral
2 sentences1935(Ruckstuhl v. Healy, 222 App. Div. 152 .) In the absence of any claim of fraud or misrepresentation, however, the vendee is put on notice of the contents of a duly recorded document and its meaning.” For the reasons assigned we are of the opinion that the judgment so far as appealed from by the defendant should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. 1928(Ruckstuhl v. Healy, 222 App. Div. 152 .) In the absence of any claim of fraud or misrepresentation, however, the vendee is put on notice of the contents of a duly recorded document and its meaning. | 2 | 1928–1935 |
Rudolph v. Southern Beneficial League
neutral
2 sentences1912Rudolph v. Southern Beneficial League, 7 N. Y. 1912Rudolph v. Southern Beneficial League, 7 N. Y. | 2 | 1912–1912 |
| Roberts v. . Tobias neutral | 2 | 1892–1911 |
| Gibbs v. New York City Employees' Retirement System green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Matter of Richards v. Allied Universal Sec. green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| Sheila C. v. Povich green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| People v. Kevrekian green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| People v. Ryerson neutral | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| People v. Alger green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| People v. McCain green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Storozynski v. Storozynski green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Kadyimov v. Mackinnon green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Gordon v. Ratner green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Wankel v. Spodek green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Goldblum v. Franklin Munson Fire District green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Zito v. Jastremski green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Altman v. Donnenfeld green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| People v. Layton neutral | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Hornfeld v. Gaare green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L. green | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| Gallo v. McGoldrick neutral | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Oxford Group-Moral Re-Armament, MRA, Inc. v. Sweet green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| De Long v. County of Erie green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Cuffy v. City of New York green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| People v. Payne green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Eighty Eight Bleecker Co. v. 88 Bleecker Street Owners, Inc. green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.