mootness doctrine (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

mootness doctrine in Connecticut

147 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2026 24 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (32)

CaseFollowedCited
Loisel v. Rowegreen
conn · 1995 · cited in 41 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1995–2026
2 sentences

2026The respondent mother’s claim that her challenge to the order of temporary custody remained eligible for review under the capable of repetition, yet evading review exception to the mootness doctrine failed under the first required criterion of that doctrine under Loisel v. Rowe ( 233 Conn. 370 ), namely, that the challenged action was of such limited duration that a strong likelihood that the substantial majority of cases raising a question about its validity will become moot before appellate litigation can be concluded, as she failed to pursue opportunities to challenge the order of temporary

2026For an otherwise moot question to qualify for review under the capable of repetition, yet evading review exception to the mootness doctrine, it must satisfy three require- ments as set forth by our Supreme Court in Loisel v. Rowe, 233 Conn. 370, 382 , 660 A.2d 323 (1995).

2241
State v. McElveengreen
conn · 2002 · cited in 7 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2002–2025
2 sentences

2015We conclude, however, that the collateral conse- quences exception to the mootness doctrine, as set forth in State v. McElveen, 261 Conn. 198 , 802 A.2d 74 (2002), is applicable under the circumstances of this case.

2015We conclude, however, that the collateral conse- quences exception to the mootness doctrine, as set forth in State v. McElveen, 261 Conn. 198 , 802 A.2d 74 (2002), is applicable under the circumstances of this case.

47
Williams v. Ragagliagreen
conn · 2002 · cited in 6 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2005–2024
2 sentences

2024Whe[n] there is no direct practical relief available from the reversal of the judgment . . . the collateral consequences doctrine acts as a surrogate, calling for a determination whether a decision in the case can afford the litigant some practi- cal relief in the future.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Claudia F., 93 Conn. App. 343 , 345–46, 888 A.2d 1138 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 924 , 895 A.2d 796 (2006); see also Williams v. Ragaglia, 261 Conn. 219 , 226–27, 802 A.2d 778 (2002).

2024Whe[n] there is no direct practical relief available from the reversal of the judgment . . . the collateral consequences doctrine acts as a surrogate, calling for a determination whether a decision in the case can afford the litigant some practi- cal relief in the future.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Claudia F., 93 Conn. App. 343 , 345–46, 888 A.2d 1138 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 924 , 895 A.2d 796 (2006); see also Williams v. Ragaglia, 261 Conn. 219 , 226–27, 802 A.2d 778 (2002).

46
Russo v. Common Councilgreen
connappct · 2003 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2015–2023
2 sentences

2023See Russo v. Common Council, 80 Conn. App. 100, 110 , 832 A.2d 1227 (2003) (‘‘Loisel does not provide an exception to the mootness doctrine when it is merely possible that a question could recur’’ (emphasis omitted)).

2023See Russo v. Common Council, 80 Conn. App. 100, 110 , 832 A.2d 1227 (2003) (‘‘Loisel does not provide an exception to the mootness doctrine when it is merely possible that a question could recur’’ (emphasis omitted)).

24
Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information Commissiongreen
conn · 1997 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1997–2007
2 sentences

1997See Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven v. FOIC , 240 Conn. 1 , 7 , 688 A.2d 314 (1997) (the mootness doctrine ensures that an actual controversy exists); Grace Community Church v. Bethel , 30 Conn. App. 765 , 769 , 622 A.2d 591 (courts will not decide moot questions, the determination of which no practical relief can follow), cert. denied 226 Conn. 903 , 625 A.2d 1375 , cert. denied 510 U.S. 944 , 114 S.Ct. 383 , 126 L.Ed.2d 332 (1993).

1997See Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven v. FOIC, 240 Conn. 1 , 7 , ___ A.2d ___ (1997) (the mootness doctrine ensures that an actual controversy exists); Grace Community Church v. Bethel, 30 Conn. App. 765 , 769 , 622 A.2d 591 (courts will not decide moot questions, the determination of which no practical relief can follow), cert. denied 226 Conn. 903 , 625 A.2d 1375 , cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 383 , 126 L.Ed.2d 332 (1993).

24
Shays v. Local Grievance Committeegreen
conn · 1985 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1987–1996
2 sentences

1993A well defined exception to the mootness rule is where the issue is “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Moshier v. Goodnow, 217 Conn. 303, 307 , 586 A.2d 557 (1991); Shays v. Local Grievance Committee, 197 Conn. 566, 573 , 499 A.2d 1158 (1985).

1993A well defined exception to the mootness rule is where the issue is “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Moshier v. Goodnow, 217 Conn. 303, 307 , 586 A.2d 557 (1991); Shays v. Local Grievance Committee, 197 Conn. 566, 573 , 499 A.2d 1158 (1985).

24
Dutkiewicz v. Dutkiewiczgreen
conn · 2008 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2009–2017
2 sentences

2017See Dutki e wicz v. Dutki e wicz , 289 Conn. 362 , 366-67, 957 A.2d 821 (2008) ("[although] the existence of an actual controversy is an essential requisite to appellate jurisdiction ... [t]he mootness doctrine does not preclude a court from addressing an issue that is capable of repetition, yet evading review" [internal quotation marks omitted] ).

2017See Dutki e wicz v. Dutki e wicz , 289 Conn. 362 , 366-67, 957 A.2d 821 (2008) ("[although] the existence of an actual controversy is an essential requisite to appellate jurisdiction ... [t]he mootness doctrine does not preclude a court from addressing an issue that is capable of repetition, yet evading review" [internal quotation marks omitted] ).

22
Putman v. Kennedygreen
conn · 2006 · cited in 5 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2024
2 sentences

2018In Putman v. Kennedy , 279 Conn. 162 , 164-65, 900 A.2d 1256 (2006), our Supreme Court concluded that the adverse collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine applied to appeals from domestic violence restraining orders.

2018In Putman v. Kennedy , 279 Conn. 162 , 164-65, 900 A.2d 1256 (2006), our Supreme Court concluded that the adverse collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine applied to appeals from domestic violence restraining orders.

15
Iacurci v. Wellsgreen
connappct · 2008 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2026
2 sentences

2026Although the plaintiff has invoked this exception to the mootness doctrine in his supplemental memorandum, he has “failed to bring to our attention any adverse collat- eral consequences that will befall [him] . . . .” Iacurci v. McCullough v. Rocky Hill Wells, 108 Conn. App. 274, 283, 947 A.2d 1034 (2008).

2026Although the plaintiff has invoked this exception to the mootness doctrine in his supplemental memorandum, he has “failed to bring to our attention any adverse collat- eral consequences that will befall [him] . . . .” Iacurci v. McCullough v. Rocky Hill Wells, 108 Conn. App. 274, 283, 947 A.2d 1034 (2008).

13
Patterson v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen
connappct · 2009 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2009–2015
2 sentences

2015Unless the petitioner’s claim falls under an exception to the mootness doctrine, we must dismiss his appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.’’ (Citations omit- ted.) Id., 830–31.

2009The mootness doctrine does not preclude a court from addressing an issue that would otherwise be considered moot if it is “capable of repetition, yet evading review” or has “collateral consequences.” See id.

13
Weinstein v. Bradfordgreen
scotus · 1975 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1998
2 sentences

1998The Union also argues that this case is subject to the mootness exception of "capable of repetition yet evading review." Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 , 96 S.Ct. 347 , 46 L.Ed.2d CT Page 561 350 (1975); Board of Education v. Board of Labor Relations, 205 Conn. 116 , 126 , 530 A.2d 588 (1987); Hartford Principal's Supervisor's Assn. v. Shedd, 202 Conn. 492 , 496 , 522 A.2d 264 (1987).

1998The Union also argues that this case is subject to the mootness exception of "capable of repetition yet evading review." Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 , 96 S.Ct. 347 , 46 L.Ed.2d CT Page 561 350 (1975); Board of Education v. Board of Labor Relations, 205 Conn. 116 , 126 , 530 A.2d 588 (1987); Hartford Principal's Supervisor's Assn. v. Shedd, 202 Conn. 492 , 496 , 522 A.2d 264 (1987).

13
Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Uniongreen
conn · 1979 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1982–1989
2 sentences

1989We have duly considered this exception, succinctly described in Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 177 Conn. 17, 20-21 , 411 A.2d 1 (1979), and find it inapplicable to this case.

1989We have duly considered this exception, succinctly described in Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 177 Conn. 17, 20-21 , 411 A.2d 1 (1979), and find it inapplicable to this case.

13
State v. Reddygreen
connappct · 2012 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2018
2 sentences

2018Where there is no direct practical relief available from the reversal of the judgment ... the collateral consequences doctrine acts as a surrogate, calling for a determination whether a decision in the case can afford the litigant some practical relief in the future.'' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Reddy , 135 Conn. App. 65 , 69-70, 42 A.3d 406 (2012) ; see also Williams v. Ragaglia , 261 Conn. 219 , 226, 802 A.2d 778 (2002) (litigant bears burden of demonstrating reasonable possibility that prejudicial consequences will occur); State v. McElveen , supra, 261 Conn. at 205 , 802

2018Where there is no direct practical relief available from the reversal of the judgment ... the collateral consequences doctrine acts as a surrogate, calling for a determination whether a decision in the case can afford the litigant some practical relief in the future.'' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Reddy , 135 Conn. App. 65 , 69-70, 42 A.3d 406 (2012) ; see also Williams v. Ragaglia , 261 Conn. 219 , 226, 802 A.2d 778 (2002) (litigant bears burden of demonstrating reasonable possibility that prejudicial consequences will occur); State v. McElveen , supra, 261 Conn. at 205 , 802

12
In Re Priscilla A.green
connappct · 2010 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2015–2018
2 sentences

2018In re Priscilla A. , 122 Conn. App. 832 , 836, 2 A.3d 24 (2010).

2018In re Priscilla A. , 122 Conn. App. 832 , 836, 2 A.3d 24 (2010).

12
State v. Wassilliegreen
alaska · 1980 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Cf. State v. Wassillie , 606 P.2d 1279 , 1280 (Alaska 1980) (applying same exception under similar circumstances); Kraft v. State , 156 So.3d 1116 , 1117 (Fla. App. 2015) (same); Saunders v. Hornecker , 344 P.3d 771 , 775 (Wyo. 2015) (applying same exception to different constitutional challenge to bail order).

2017Cf. State v. Wassil- lie, 606 P.2d 1279, 1280 (Alaska 1980) (applying same exception under similar circumstances); Kraft v. State, 156 So. 3d 1116, 1117 (Fla. App. 2015) (same); Saunders v. Hornecker, 344 P.3d 771, 775 (Wyo. 2015) (applying same exception to different constitutional challenge to bail order).

12
Saunders v. Horneckergreen
wyo · 2015 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Cf. State v. Wassillie , 606 P.2d 1279 , 1280 (Alaska 1980) (applying same exception under similar circumstances); Kraft v. State , 156 So.3d 1116 , 1117 (Fla. App. 2015) (same); Saunders v. Hornecker , 344 P.3d 771 , 775 (Wyo. 2015) (applying same exception to different constitutional challenge to bail order).

2017Cf. State v. Wassil- lie, 606 P.2d 1279, 1280 (Alaska 1980) (applying same exception under similar circumstances); Kraft v. State, 156 So. 3d 1116, 1117 (Fla. App. 2015) (same); Saunders v. Hornecker, 344 P.3d 771, 775 (Wyo. 2015) (applying same exception to different constitutional challenge to bail order).

12
Stephanie Kraft v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Cf. State v. Wassillie , 606 P.2d 1279 , 1280 (Alaska 1980) (applying same exception under similar circumstances); Kraft v. State , 156 So.3d 1116 , 1117 (Fla. App. 2015) (same); Saunders v. Hornecker , 344 P.3d 771 , 775 (Wyo. 2015) (applying same exception to different constitutional challenge to bail order).

2017Cf. State v. Wassil- lie, 606 P.2d 1279, 1280 (Alaska 1980) (applying same exception under similar circumstances); Kraft v. State, 156 So. 3d 1116, 1117 (Fla. App. 2015) (same); Saunders v. Hornecker, 344 P.3d 771, 775 (Wyo. 2015) (applying same exception to different constitutional challenge to bail order).

12
PIQUET v. Town of Chestergreen
conn · 2010 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2012–2016
2 sentences

2012Guided by this court’s recent decision in In re Addie May Nesbitt, 124 Conn. App. 400 , 5 A.3d 518 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 917 , 10 A.3d 1051 (2010), we conclude that although this appeal is moot, it satisfies the requirements of the collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine.

2012Guided by this court’s recent decision in In re Addie May Nesbitt, 124 Conn. App. 400 , 5 A.3d 518 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 917 , 10 A.3d 1051 (2010), we conclude that although this appeal is moot, it satisfies the requirements of the collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine.

12
In Re Nesbittgreen
connappct · 2010 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2012–2016
2 sentences

2012Guided by this court’s recent decision in In re Addie May Nesbitt, 124 Conn. App. 400 , 5 A.3d 518 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 917 , 10 A.3d 1051 (2010), we conclude that although this appeal is moot, it satisfies the requirements of the collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine.

2012Guided by this court’s recent decision in In re Addie May Nesbitt, 124 Conn. App. 400 , 5 A.3d 518 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 917 , 10 A.3d 1051 (2010), we conclude that although this appeal is moot, it satisfies the requirements of the collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine.

12
In re Forrest B.green
connappct · 2008 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
12
Tappin v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.green
conn · 2003 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
12
Perry v. Perrygreen
conn · 1992 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1993–1995
12
Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.green
conn · 2020 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
11
State v. Guildgreen
conn · 2025 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
11
Kennedy v. Kennedygreen
connappct · 2008 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
11
Taber v. Tabergreen
connappct · 2022 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
11
Josephine Towers, L.P. v. Kellygreen
connappct · 2020 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
11
Carhart v. Stenberggreen
ned · 1997 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
11
State v. Longogreen
conn · 1984 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
11
Rosemarie B.-F. v. Curtis P.green
connappct · 2012 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
11
Sweeney v. Sweeneygreen
conn · 2004 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
11
Peterson v. Roblesgreen
connappct · 2012 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (48)

CaseCitedYears
Chimblo v. Monahan neutral
conn · 2003
2 sentences

2009Whe[n] there is no direct practical relief available . . . the collateral consequences doctrine acts as a surrogate, calling for a determination whether a decision in the case can afford the litigant some practical relief in the future.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Chimblo v. Monahan, 265 Conn. 650, 655-56 , 829 A.2d 841 (2003). *491 The court’s December 3, 2008 order rendered the defendant’s appeal moot.

2009Whe[n] there is no direct practical relief available . . . the collateral consequences doctrine acts as a surrogate, calling for a determination whether a decision in the case can afford the litigant some practical relief in the future.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Chimblo v. Monahan, 265 Conn. 650, 655-56 , 829 A.2d 841 (2003). *491 The court’s December 3, 2008 order rendered the defendant’s appeal moot.

52005–2009
State v. Nardini green
conn · 1982
2 sentences

2022The principles underpin- ning the mootness doctrine and justiciability are well settled. ‘‘We begin with the four part test for justiciabil- ity established in State v. Nardini, 187 Conn. 109 , 445 A.2d 304 (1982). . . .

2022The principles underpin- ning the mootness doctrine and justiciability are well settled. ‘‘We begin with the four part test for justiciabil- ity established in State v. Nardini, 187 Conn. 109 , 445 A.2d 304 (1982). . . .

42009–2022
Grace Community Church v. Town of Bethel green
connappct · 1993
2 sentences

1997See Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven v. FOIC, 240 Conn. 1 , 7 , ___ A.2d ___ (1997) (the mootness doctrine ensures that an actual controversy exists); Grace Community Church v. Bethel, 30 Conn. App. 765 , 769 , 622 A.2d 591 (courts will not decide moot questions, the determination of which no practical relief can follow), cert. denied 226 Conn. 903 , 625 A.2d 1375 , cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 383 , 126 L.Ed.2d 332 (1993).

1997See Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven v. FOIC, 240 Conn. 1 , 7 , ___ A.2d ___ (1997) (the mootness doctrine ensures that an actual controversy exists); Grace Community Church v. Bethel, 30 Conn. App. 765 , 769 , 622 A.2d 591 (courts will not decide moot questions, the determination of which no practical relief can follow), cert. denied 226 Conn. 903 , 625 A.2d 1375 , cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 383 , 126 L.Ed.2d 332 (1993).

41993–1997
Ivimey v. Town of Watertown green
conn · 1993
2 sentences

1997See Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven v. FOIC , 240 Conn. 1 , 7 , 688 A.2d 314 (1997) (the mootness doctrine ensures that an actual controversy exists); Grace Community Church v. Bethel , 30 Conn. App. 765 , 769 , 622 A.2d 591 (courts will not decide moot questions, the determination of which no practical relief can follow), cert. denied 226 Conn. 903 , 625 A.2d 1375 , cert. denied 510 U.S. 944 , 114 S.Ct. 383 , 126 L.Ed.2d 332 (1993).

1997See Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven v. FOIC, 240 Conn. 1 , 7 , ___ A.2d ___ (1997) (the mootness doctrine ensures that an actual controversy exists); Grace Community Church v. Bethel, 30 Conn. App. 765 , 769 , 622 A.2d 591 (courts will not decide moot questions, the determination of which no practical relief can follow), cert. denied 226 Conn. 903 , 625 A.2d 1375 , cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 383 , 126 L.Ed.2d 332 (1993).

31996–1997
Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission green
· 1911
2 sentences

1994A well established exception to the mootness rule is where the issue is “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U.S. 498, 515 , 31 S. Ct. 279 , 55 L.

1994A well established exception to the mootness rule is where the issue is “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U.S. 498, 515 , 31 S. Ct. 279 , 55 L.

31982–1994
State v. McElveen green
connappct · 2009
2 sentences

2026Accordingly, “[b]ecause the [plaintiff] has not established [prejudicial collateral] consequences by more than mere conjecture, he has not successfully invoked the collateral consequences excep- tion to the mootness doctrine.” State v. McElveen, 117 Conn. App. 486, 492 n.5, 979 A.2d 604 (2009), appeal dismissed, 302 Conn. 532, 29 A.3d 897 (2011) (certifica- tion improvidently granted).

2026Accordingly, “[b]ecause the [plaintiff] has not established [prejudicial collateral] consequences by more than mere conjecture, he has not successfully invoked the collateral consequences excep- tion to the mootness doctrine.” State v. McElveen, 117 Conn. App. 486, 492 n.5, 979 A.2d 604 (2009), appeal dismissed, 302 Conn. 532, 29 A.3d 897 (2011) (certifica- tion improvidently granted).

22009–2026
Burton v. Dept. of Environmental Protection green
conn · 2021
2 sentences

2024Finally, to the extent the petitioner’s counsel attempted to invoke the collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine during oral argument before this court, we do not consider them because ‘‘[i]t is well settled that a claim cannot be raised for the first time at oral argument.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Burton v. Dept. of Environmental Pro- tection, 337 Conn. 781 , 797 n.12, 256 A.3d 655 (2021).

2024Finally, to the extent the petitioner’s counsel attempted to invoke the collateral consequences exception to the mootness doctrine during oral argument before this court, we do not consider them because ‘‘[i]t is well settled that a claim cannot be raised for the first time at oral argument.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Burton v. Dept. of Environmental Pro- tection, 337 Conn. 781 , 797 n.12, 256 A.3d 655 (2021).

22024–2024
State v. Gomes green
conn · 2021
2 sentences

2024When, during the pendency of an appeal, events have occurred that preclude an appellate court from granting any practical relief through its disposition of the merits, a case has become moot.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Gomes, 337 Conn. 826 , 838–39, 256 A.3d 131 (2021).

2024When, during the pendency of an appeal, events have occurred that preclude an appellate court from granting any practical relief through its disposition of the merits, a case has become moot.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Gomes, 337 Conn. 826 , 838–39, 256 A.3d 131 (2021).

22024–2024
Pierre v. Solnit green
conn · 1995
2 sentences

2023Id., 401 .

2023Id., 401 .

22023–2023
Boisvert v. Gavis green
conn · 2019
2 sentences

2023As between private parties, and relying on case law involv- ing private parties, we have stated that, ‘‘a defendant’s voluntary cessation of a challenged practice does not deprive a . . . court of its power to determine the legal- ity of the practice, because, [i]f it did, the courts would be compelled to leave [t]he defendant . . . free to return to his old ways.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) Boisvert v. Gavis, 332 Conn. 115 , 139–40, 210 A.3d 1 (2019).

2023As between private parties, and relying on case law involv- ing private parties, we have stated that, ‘‘a defendant’s voluntary cessation of a challenged practice does not deprive a . . . court of its power to determine the legal- ity of the practice, because, [i]f it did, the courts would be compelled to leave [t]he defendant . . . free to return to his old ways.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) Boisvert v. Gavis, 332 Conn. 115 , 139–40, 210 A.3d 1 (2019).

22023–2023
State v. Preston green
conn · 2008
2 sentences

2015The defendant nevertheless argues that this appeal is not moot because the collateral consequences excep- tion to the mootness doctrine applies. ‘‘[U]nder this court’s long-standing mootness jurisprudence . . . despite developments during the pendency of an appeal that would otherwise render a claim moot, the court may retain jurisdiction when a litigant shows that there is a reasonable possibility that prejudicial collateral consequences will occur.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367, 382 , 944 A.2d 276 (2008). ‘‘[T]o invoke successfully the collateral con-

2015The defendant nevertheless argues that this appeal is not moot because the collateral consequences excep- tion to the mootness doctrine applies. ‘‘[U]nder this court’s long-standing mootness jurisprudence . . . despite developments during the pendency of an appeal that would otherwise render a claim moot, the court may retain jurisdiction when a litigant shows that there is a reasonable possibility that prejudicial collateral consequences will occur.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367, 382 , 944 A.2d 276 (2008). ‘‘[T]o invoke successfully the collateral con-

22009–2015
Hartford Principals' & Supervisors' Ass'n v. Shedd green
conn · 1987
21992–1998
Board of Education v. Connecticut Board of Labor Relations neutral
conn · 1987
21995–1998
Grace Community Church v. Town of Bethel green
conn · 1993
21997–1997
Grace Community Church v. Town of Bethel green
scotus · 1993
21997–1997
Kurahara & Morrissey v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation green
scotus · 1993
21997–1997
Moshier v. Goodnow green
conn · 1991
21993–1995
Taylor v. Robinson green
conn · 1976
21981–1995
Board of Education v. City of New Haven green
conn · 1992
21992–1992
Sosna v. Iowa green
scotus · 1975
21979–1987
Smith v. Commissioner of Correction green
conn · 2010
12026–2026
In Re Earl B. green
conn · 2010
12026–2026
State v. McElveen green
conn · 2011
12026–2026
Fleming v. City of Bridgeport green
connappct · 2005
12026–2026
Wilcox v. Ferraina green
connappct · 2007
12026–2026
Fleming v. City of Bridgeport green
conn · 2007
12026–2026
In Re Earl B. green
connappct · 2010
12026–2026
R. G.-R. v. S. R. green
connappct · 2024
12025–2025
In re Claudia F. green
connappct · 2006
12024–2024
Kyle S. v. Jayne K. green
connappct · 2018
12024–2024
In Re Alba P.-V. green
connappct · 2012
12024–2024
State v. Powell green
conn · 2006
12024–2024
Bowden v. Commissioner of Correction green
conn · 2006
12024–2024
American Tax Funding, LLC v. Design Land Developers of Newtown, Inc. yellow
connappct · 2020
12022–2022
Lyon v. Jones green
conn · 2009
12021–2021
State v. Lester green
conn · 2017
12021–2021
Hunt v. Guimond green
connappct · 2002
12020–2020
Mercado v. Comm'r of Corr. green
conn · 2018
12019–2019
State v. Fletcher green
conn · 2018
12019–2019
State v. Fletcher green
connappct · 2018
12019–2019

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-129 (15) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (13) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-120 (12) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-166 (9) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-15 (7) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-56 (7) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-263 (7) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-265a (7) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-2z (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-183 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-142 (6)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 1305 (1976–2026) IL 646 (1965–2026) TX 456 (1976–2026) PA 340 (1967–2026) OH 248 (1975–2026) CT 147 (1979–2026) CA 115 (1978–2026) HI 111 (1987–2026) MO 93 (1976–2025) TN 92 (1983–2026) AK 89 (1971–2025) ID 87 (1983–2026) AR 79 (1992–2026) IA 78 (1982–2025) KS 74 (1978–2025) ME 74 (1981–2025) VT 71 (1978–2025) CO 64 (1975–2026) UT 62 (1981–2026) NC 57 (1976–2025) KY 48 (1983–2026) WI 48 (1986–2026) IN 46 (1987–2026) MI 46 (1978–2026) NE 43 (1989–2026) SC 41 (1996–2024) MD 40 (1976–2025) NV 38 (1986–2025) MN 36 (1980–2025) WA 34 (1988–2026) GA 32 (1983–2025) WY 32 (1985–2025) RI 27 (2004–2025) DC 26 (1964–2024) OK 26 (1984–2026) MT 26 (1996–2022) NM 24 (1983–2025) OR 23 (1995–2021) AZ 22 (1971–2026) VA 21 (1988–2025) MS 21 (1994–2025) FL 21 (1983–2025) MA 20 (1984–2023) SD 18 (1978–2026) DE 16 (1988–2025) AL 15 (1984–2025) LA 14 (1998–2025) WV 12 (1984–2026) NH 9 (1977–2023) NJ 8 (1977–2024) VI 6 (2010–2024) ND 4 (2000–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check