propriety instruction in Colorado

22 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1900–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (18)

Case	Followed	Cited
Bear Valley Church of Christ v. DeBosegreen colo · 1996 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 1 sentence 2024See Bear Valley Church of Christ, 928 P.2d at 1329-30 (declining to review instructional error raised for the first time in motion for new trial 16 where motion was denied “in part because . . . the defendants did not adequately preserve the issue”). ¶ 35 The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion by denying Simon’s motion for a new trial, and because the issue was not preserved, we decline to review the propriety of the instruction.6 III.	1	1
Frasco v. Peoplegreen colo · 2007 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017See Frasco, 165 P.3d at 704 (“[T]he precise procedure to be followed [in preventing unfair prejudice] must lie within the trial court’s sound discretion.”). ¶70 To the majority’s conclusion that the factors are inapposite, I see greater merit in the trial court’s analysis, and more importantly, I see the trial court exercising its discretion in a reasonable manner. 2017See Frasco, 165 P.3d at 704 (“[T]he precise procedure to be followed [in preventing unfair prejudice] must lie within the trial court's sound discretion.”). ¶70 To the majority’s conclusion that the factors are inapposite, I see greater merit in the trial court’s analysis, and more importantly, I see the trial court exercising its 2 In McKinney, a division of the court of appeals interpreted a 1999 amendment to C.R.C.P. 47(m) to require that the trial court send an inculpatory, out-of-court written statement from the defendant’s coconspirator, which the trial court had admitted into evidence,	1	1
Krueger v. Arygreen coloctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 1 sentence 2014Notes on Use 2 for CJI-Civ. 15:2 lists as professionals “surgeon,” “dentist,” and “chiropractor,” but not “nurse.” And in any event, “notes contained in CJI are not law.” Krueger v. Ary, 220 P.3d 923, 928 (Colo. App. 2007). ¶ 18 Nor is the exercise-of-judgment sentence in CJI-Civ 15:27 determinative.	1	1
Meier v. McCoygreen coloctapp · 2004 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010Meier v. McCoy, 119 P.3d 519, 524 (Colo.App.2004) ("When reviewing the propriety of an instruction, we must consider the instructions as a whole and determine whether they properly instructed the jury.").	1	1
Pletchas v. Von Poppenheimgreen colo · 1961 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003See Pletchas v. Von Poppenheim, 148 Colo. 127 , 365 P.2d 261 (1961)(when there was disputed evidence of level of driver's intoxication, whether injured passenger knew driver was impaired went to jury to determine comparative negligence and assumption of risk); Gross v. B.G. 2003See Pletchas v. Von Poppenheim, 148 Colo. 127 , 365 P.2d 261 (1961)(when there was disputed evidence of level of driver's intoxication, whether injured passenger knew driver was impaired went to jury to determine comparative negligence and assumption of risk); Gross v. B.G.	1	1
United States v. Marcusgreen ca3 · 1948 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Benjamin Jerome Hicks, United States of America v. Frankie Randallgreen ca4 · 1984 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Jeffrey Scott Webstergreen ca8 · 1985 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Mae Braxtongreen ca7 · 1989 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Ricky Dawn A/K/A \Money\"green · 1990 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Steven Cartergreen ca7 · 1990 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Ronnie Bryser, Gerald Degerolamo, Vincent Degerolamogreen ca2 · 1992 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Fred William Megnagreen ca5 · 1971 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Maurice Bursegreen ca2 · 1976 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
United States v. Donald Antonio Ragghiantigreen ca9 · 1977 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Gerrish Corp.green scotus · 1992 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19	1	1
People v. Rubanowitzgreen colo · 1984 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986 1 sentence 1986See People v. Rubanowitz, 688 P.2d 231 (Colo.1984); People v. Torres, 701 P.2d 78 (Colo.App.1984).	1	1
Shumate v. State Personnel Boardgreen coloctapp · 1974 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981 2 sentences 1981See Shumate v. State Personnel 530 Board, 34 Colo.App. 393 , 528 P.2d 404 (1974). 1981See Shumate v. State Personnel 530 Board, 34 Colo.App. 393 , 528 P.2d 404 (1974).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (22)

Case	Cited	Years
Wilson v. Denver, South Park & Pacific Railroad neutral colo · 1883 2 sentences 1904Co., 7 Colo. 101 , cited by defendant’s counsel in support of their contention, there is an intimation that a plaintiff alleging negligence in general terms, may be required to make his complaint more definite and certain; but it is expressly stated that the propriety of the requirement is dependent on the possession by him of the necessary information. 1904Co., 7 Colo. 101 , cited by defendant’s counsel in support of their contention, there is an intimation that a plaintiff alleging negligence in general terms, may be required to make his complaint more definite and certain; but it is expressly stated that the propriety of the requirement is dependent on the possession by him of the necessary information.	2	1904–1904
Burchinell v. Hirsh neutral coloctapp · 1895 2 sentences 1900This we stated and held in Burchinell v. Hirsch et al., 5 Colo. App. 500 . 1900This we stated and held in Burchinell v. Hirsch et al., 5 Colo. App. 500 .	2	1900–1900
People v. Lewis green coloctapp · 1985 1 sentence 2004People v. Lewis, 710 P.2d 1110 (Colo.App.1985).	1	2004–2004
People v. Toler green colo · 2000 1 sentence 2002We specifically do not address the propriety of that instruction under People v. Toler, supra, in the context of this case because, even if erroneously given, the instruction inured to defendant's benefit by giving him a greater right to use self-defense than might otherwise have been available.	1	2002–2002
Toomey v. Bunnell green scotus · 1990 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1992–1992
Walker v. United States green scotus · 1991 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1992–1992
JV-108162 v. Arizona green scotus · 1991 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1992–1992
Schirmer v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co. green sc · 1919 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.19 1992See, e.g., United States v. Bryser, 954 F.2d 79, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Degerolamo v. United States, _ U.S. _, 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992); United States v. Carter, 910 F.2d 1524, 1531 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 1628 , 113 L.Ed.2d 724 (1991); United States v. Dawn, 897 F.2d 1444, 1450 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 389 , 112 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990); United States v. Braxton, 877 F.2d 556, 564 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Webster, 769 F.2d 487, 490-91 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Hicks, 748 F.2d 854, 857 (4th Cir.1984); United	1	1992–1992
Koltay v. Koltay green colo · 1983 2 sentences 1987This court held in Koltay v. Koltay, 667 P.2d 1374 (Colo.1983), that the general assembly has recognized the propriety of a claim for post-minority support in a dissolution of marriage action 168 and that courts in dissolution actions are empowered to order post-minority support for a child. 1987*This court held in Koltay v. Koltay, 667 P.2d 1374 (Colo.1983), that the general assembly has recognized the propriety of a claim for post-minority support in a dissolution of marriage action and that courts in dissolution actions are empowered to order post-minority support for a child.	1	1987–1987
People v. Torres green coloctapp · 1984 1 sentence 1986See People v. Rubanowitz, 688 P.2d 231 (Colo.1984); People v. Torres, 701 P.2d 78 (Colo.App.1984).	1	1986–1986
Vigil v. People green colo · 1978 2 sentences 1984Accordingly, reversal is not warranted absent a finding of plain error “seriously affecting his substantial rights.” Vigil v. People, 196 Colo. 522 , 587 P.2d 1196 (1978); People v. Barker, 180 Colo. 28 , 501 P.2d 1041 (1972). 1984Accordingly, reversal is not warranted absent a finding of plain error “seriously affecting his substantial rights.” Vigil v. People, 196 Colo. 522 , 587 P.2d 1196 (1978); People v. Barker, 180 Colo. 28 , 501 P.2d 1041 (1972).	1	1984–1984
People v. Barker green colo · 1972 2 sentences 1984Accordingly, reversal is not warranted absent a finding of plain error “seriously affecting his substantial rights.” Vigil v. People, 196 Colo. 522 , 587 P.2d 1196 (1978); People v. Barker, 180 Colo. 28 , 501 P.2d 1041 (1972). 1984Accordingly, reversal is not warranted absent a finding of plain error “seriously affecting his substantial rights.” Vigil v. People, 196 Colo. 522 , 587 P.2d 1196 (1978); People v. Barker, 180 Colo. 28 , 501 P.2d 1041 (1972).	1	1984–1984
Kenneth H. Gunther v. United States green cadc · 1956	1	1980–1980
King Soopers, Inc. v. Mitchell green colo · 1959	1	1966–1966
Jacobsen v. McGinness neutral colo · 1957	1	1962–1962
Iacino v. Brown green colo · 1950	1	1962–1962
Ridley v. Young green colo · 1953	1	1962–1962
Piper v. Mayer neutral colo · 1961	1	1962–1962
Parker v. Couch green colo · 1960	1	1962–1962
Schreiner v. People green colo · 1961	1	1961–1961
Mathews v. Mathews neutral colo · 1920	1	1921–1921
Boswell v. State green · 1879	1	1915–1915

Where else courts name it

CA 113 (1876–2026) MO 61 (1860–2015) IL 57 (1882–2025) TX 56 (1917–2026) NY 49 (1854–2018) IN 47 (1906–2026) PA 31 (1908–2025) FL 28 (1902–2025) NC 23 (1850–2025) MD 23 (1917–2021) CO 22 (1900–2024) MS 22 (1968–2009) AL 22 (1854–2016) IA 21 (1918–2022) OH 21 (1970–2026) MI 21 (1900–2021) UT 19 (1981–2020) NE 18 (1910–1998) WA 16 (1919–2025) CT 15 (1936–2010) WY 15 (1945–2024) KY 14 (1914–2016) NJ 14 (1884–2021) OR 14 (1898–2023) WV 13 (1882–2025) TN 12 (1934–2025) MA 11 (1961–2023) LA 10 (1981–1995) MN 10 (1932–2013) AZ 10 (1966–2015) KS 10 (1897–2016) NV 9 (1956–2014) SD 9 (1909–2025) VA 9 (1876–1997) MT 9 (1895–1987) RI 9 (1980–2026) ME 8 (1855–1981) AR 7 (1946–2010) OK 6 (1935–1995) GA 6 (1877–2023) NM 6 (1963–2018) DC 5 (1893–1996) HI 5 (1911–2005) DE 5 (1912–2008) VT 5 (1868–2006) NH 4 (1820–1995) ID 4 (1919–2022) AK 3 (1977–1990) WI 3 (1958–1973) ND 3 (1908–1993) SC 2 (1881–2014) VI 2 (1981–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check