Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1918–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Watsongreen2 sentences2022The defendant and court-appointed counsel appeared at and completed arraignment proceedings on November 28, 2017, without any renewal of the application.” Courts have “the duty sua sponte to inquire into the propriety of defense counsel’s representation when it ‘knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists.’” State v. Watson, 620 N.W.2d 233, 238 (Iowa 2000) (quoting Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 347 (1980)). 2018In State v. Watson, our supreme court noted “[a] trial court has the duty sua sponte to inquire into the propriety of defense counsel’s representation when it ‘knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists.’” 620 N.W.2d 233, 238 (Iowa 2000). | 4 | 4 |
Cuyler v. Sullivangreen2 sentences2022The defendant and court-appointed counsel appeared at and completed arraignment proceedings on November 28, 2017, without any renewal of the application.” Courts have “the duty sua sponte to inquire into the propriety of defense counsel’s representation when it ‘knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists.’” State v. Watson, 620 N.W.2d 233, 238 (Iowa 2000) (quoting Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 347 (1980)). 2014The Watson court, relying almost exclusively on Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), held as follows: A trial court has the duty sua sponte to inquire into the propriety of defense counsel’s representation when it knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists. | 1 | 3 |
Marlon Mormann v. Iowa Workforce Developmentgreen1 sentence2019See Mormann v. Iowa Workforce Dev., 913 N.W.2d 554, 566 (Iowa 2018) 10 Because our holding rests on the district court’s misapplication of the law in granting Rod’s motion to dismiss, we need not decide the propriety of hearing expert testimony before deciding whether to dismiss based on the petition’s failure to state a claim upon which any relief may be granted or whether Max preserved error on his objection to that procedure. 11 On appeal Rod does not assert the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. 7 (discussing difference between motion on pleadings and standards for summary judgme | 1 | 1 |
Sierra Club Iowa Chapter, Linda Biederman, and Elwood Garlock v. Iowa Department of Transportationgreen1 sentence2017Sierra Club Iowa Chapter v. Iowa Dep’t of Transp., 832 N.W.2d 636, 641 (Iowa 2013). 8 In a notice of additional authorities, Graziano cites amendments to Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.904 and Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.101, which eliminated the propriety requirement beginning on March 1, 2017. | 1 | 1 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. K.G.T.green1 sentence2017It is our general rule to interpret changes to court rules prospectively “if there is no additional enactment that expressly makes the law or rule retrospective.” Iowa Sup. Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. K.G.T., 722 N.W.2d 787, 790 (Iowa 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Sun Valley Iowa Lake Ass'n v. Andersongreen1 sentence2014Id. at 637-38 (alterations in original) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Pippins v. Stategreen1 sentence2004See Watson, 620 N.W.2d at 239 (noting “most conflict of interest cases arise in the context of one attorney representing multiple defendants”); see also Pippins, 661 N.W.2d at 548 (“most cases that have discussed conflicts of interest have involved an attorney who has represented a defendant or a prosecution witness in the current prosecution or simultaneous civil litigation”); Watson, 620 N.W.2d at 238 (“A trial court has the duty sua sponte to inquire into the propriety of defense counsel’s representation when it knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists.”). | 1 | 1 |
Raub v. General Income Sponsors of Iowa, Inc.green1 sentence1996Raub v. General Income Sponsors, 176 N.W.2d 216, 220 (Iowa 1970) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
North Platte Lodge, B. P. O. E. v. Board of Equalizationgreen2 sentences1994North Platte Lodge 985 v. Board of Equalization, 125 Neb. 841 , 252 N.W. 313, 314 (1934); 73 Am.Jur.2d Stipulations § 5, at 540. 1994North Platte Lodge 985 v. Board of Equalization, 125 Neb. 841 , 252 N.W. 313, 314 (1934); 73 Am.Jur.2d Stipulations § 5, at 540. | 1 | 1 |
Rush v. Raygreen1 sentence1988E.g., Rush v. Ray, 332 N.W.2d 325, 326 (Iowa 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Hanson Silo Co. v. Bennettgreen2 sentences1979Hanson Silo Co. v. Bennett, 254 Iowa 928, 932-3 , 119 N.W.2d 764, 767 (1963). 1979Hanson Silo Co. v. Bennett, 254 Iowa 928, 932-3 , 119 N.W.2d 764, 767 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nicolagreen2 sentences1966See State v. Nicola, 169 Iowa 171 , 151 N.W. 70 . 1966See State v. Nicola, 169 Iowa 171 , 151 N.W. 70 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Dorman
green
1 sentence2016“The propriety of such an instruction depends on the facts of each particular case.” Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Perkins v. Walker
green
1 sentence1990The propriety of instruction 13 was recently considered in Perkins v. Walker, 406 N.W.2d 189 (Iowa 1987). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Bige
green
2 sentences1970The evidence was in sharp conflict as to whether the shooting was accidental or something more that would amount to first degree murder or one of the included offenses.” In holding instruction as to the effect of “flight” may be proper even though there is no direct evidence the accused fled to avoid arrest, we said in State v. Bige, 195 Iowa 1342, 1347-1348 , 193 N.W. 17 , 20: “It is thought by appellant that the court was not warranted in giving an instruction on flight, because there was no foundation in the evidence, for that it was not shown that defendant knew he was accused or suspected 1970The evidence was in sharp conflict as to whether the shooting *403 was accidental or something more that would amount to first degree murder or one of the included offenses." In holding instruction as to the effect of "flight" may be proper even though there is no direct evidence the accused fled to avoid arrest, we said in State v. Bige, 195 Iowa 1342, 1347-1348 , 193 N.W. 17 , 20: "It is thought by appellant that the court was not warranted in giving an instruction on flight, because there was no foundation in the evidence, for that it was not shown that defendant knew he was accused or susp | 1 | 1970–1970 |
State v. Barton
green
2 sentences1967In State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 927 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 888-891 , we condemned an instruction which stated as follows: “ ‘The defendant did not testify before you as a witness. 1967In State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 927 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 888-891 , we condemned an instruction which stated as follows: “ ‘The defendant did not testify before you as a witness. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query
green
2 sentences1940The propriety of this rule was recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query, 286 U. S. 472, 480 , 52 S. Ct. 631, 634 , 76 L. 1940The propriety of this rule was recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query, 286 U. S. 472, 480 , 52 S. Ct. 631, 634 , 76 L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Powers v. Iowa Glue Co.
green
1 sentence1918In Powers v. Iowa Glue Co., 183 Iowa 1082 , it is settled that, where brief points or propositions are made in the manner prescribed by rule, review must be granted though there be no argument in extenso. | 1 | 1918–1918 |
State v. Brooks
green
1 sentence1918State v. Brooks, 181 Iowa 874 , holds that, where an exception clearly advises the court in advance wherein it is claimed that a proposed charge is faulty, a right of review of the propriety of the instruction given is not waived by a failure to ask instructions upon the point. | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.