21 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bowman v. Bennettgreen2 sentences1995See Ohlen v. Harriman, 296 N.W.2d 794, 795-96 (Iowa 1980); Michael, 292 N.W.2d at 420 ; Bowman v. Bennett, 250 N.W.2d 47, 50 (Iowa 1977); and Van Ellen v. Meyer, 207 N.W.2d 552, 554 (Iowa 1973). 1984The question raised by Aquaslide is whether pertinent language in a stipulation entered into by the Beecks and incorporated in the divorce decree, see Bowman v. Bennett, 250 N.W.2d 47, 50 (Iowa 1977), specifically preserved the loss of consortium claim. | 2 | 2 |
Madison v. Colbygreen2 sentences1988We rejected this characterization of a loss of consortium claim in Fuller and in the more recent decision of Madison v. Colby, 348 N.W.2d 202, 208-09 (Iowa 1984). 1988We rejected this characterization of a loss of consortium claim in Fuller and in the more recent decision of Madison v. Colby, 348 N.W.2d 202, 208-09 (Iowa 1984). | 2 | 2 |
Fuller v. Buhrowgreen2 sentences1988In Fuller v. Buhrow, 292 N.W.2d 672, 675-76 (Iowa 1980), we held that the contributory fault of an injured spouse does not provide a defense to a loss of consortium claim brought on behalf of the deprived spouse against a third-party tort-feasor. 1988In Fuller v. Buhrow, 292 N.W.2d 672, 675-76 (Iowa 1980), we held that the contributory fault of an injured spouse does not provide a defense to a loss of consortium claim brought on behalf of the deprived spouse against a third-party tort-feasor. | 2 | 2 |
Beeck v. S.R. Smith Co.green2 sentences2016Smith Co., 359 N.W.2d 482, 486-87 (Iowa 1984) (holding that a minor child’s loss-of-consortium claim for an injured parent is subject to “the statute [of limitations] applicable to minors,” not the statute applicable to the parent). 2016Smith Co., 359 N.W.2d 482 , 486–87 (Iowa 1984) (holding that a minor child’s loss-of-consortium claim for an injured parent is subject to “the statute [of limitations] applicable to minors,” not the statute applicable to the parent). | 1 | 2 |
Michael v. Harrison County Rural Electric Cooperativegreen2 sentences1995See Ohlen v. Harriman, 296 N.W.2d 794, 795-96 (Iowa 1980); Michael, 292 N.W.2d at 420 ; Bowman v. Bennett, 250 N.W.2d 47, 50 (Iowa 1977); and Van Ellen v. Meyer, 207 N.W.2d 552, 554 (Iowa 1973). 1984Michael v. Harrison County Rural Electric Cooperative, 292 N.W.2d 417, 420 (Iowa 1980). | 1 | 2 |
Sylvester v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.green1 sentence2023See In re Est. of Sylvester, 559 N.W.2d 285, 288 (Iowa 1997) (“Denying indemnification from the proceeds of a loss-of- consortium claim will not subvert the intention of section 85.22, which is to prevent double recovery.”); Bertrand v. Sioux City Grain Exch., 419 N.W.2d 402, 405 (Iowa 1988) (denying indemnification from a third-party settlement for a wrongful death suit, to the extent the proceeds never reached the employee’s dependent); Toomey v. Surgical Servs., P.C., 558 N.W.2d 166, 170 (Iowa 1997) (denying indemnification when Iowa Code section 147.136 prevented the plaintiff’s tort recov | 1 | 1 |
Bertrand v. Sioux City Grain Exchangegreen1 sentence2023See In re Est. of Sylvester, 559 N.W.2d 285, 288 (Iowa 1997) (“Denying indemnification from the proceeds of a loss-of- consortium claim will not subvert the intention of section 85.22, which is to prevent double recovery.”); Bertrand v. Sioux City Grain Exch., 419 N.W.2d 402, 405 (Iowa 1988) (denying indemnification from a third-party settlement for a wrongful death suit, to the extent the proceeds never reached the employee’s dependent); Toomey v. Surgical Servs., P.C., 558 N.W.2d 166, 170 (Iowa 1997) (denying indemnification when Iowa Code section 147.136 prevented the plaintiff’s tort recov | 1 | 1 |
Toomey v. Surgical Services, P.C.green1 sentence2023See In re Est. of Sylvester, 559 N.W.2d 285, 288 (Iowa 1997) (“Denying indemnification from the proceeds of a loss-of- consortium claim will not subvert the intention of section 85.22, which is to prevent double recovery.”); Bertrand v. Sioux City Grain Exch., 419 N.W.2d 402, 405 (Iowa 1988) (denying indemnification from a third-party settlement for a wrongful death suit, to the extent the proceeds never reached the employee’s dependent); Toomey v. Surgical Servs., P.C., 558 N.W.2d 166, 170 (Iowa 1997) (denying indemnification when Iowa Code section 147.136 prevented the plaintiff’s tort recov | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Farmergreen1 sentence2008See Johnson v. Farmer, 537 N.W.2d 770, 773 (Iowa 1995). | 1 | 1 |
McGranahan v. McGoughgreen2 sentences1997See Schrock v. Shoemaker, 159 Ill.2d 533 , 203 Ill.Dec. 787, 790 , 640 N.E.2d 937, 940 (1994) (not aKowing a workers’ compensation Ken to attach to proceeds of a loss-of-consortium claim because the consortium claim “is an independent action brought in the surviving spouse’s name to recover for injuries she suffered in her own right as a result of the death of the decedent”); McGranahan v. McGough, 249 Kan. 328 , 820 P.2d 403, 411 (1991) (“Because the employer has paid nothing to the injured worker for loss of services [consortium], any recovery as a result of a loss of services action against 1997See Schrock v. Shoemaker, 159 Ill.2d 533 , 203 Ill.Dec. 787, 790 , 640 N.E.2d 937, 940 (1994) (not aKowing a workers’ compensation Ken to attach to proceeds of a loss-of-consortium claim because the consortium claim “is an independent action brought in the surviving spouse’s name to recover for injuries she suffered in her own right as a result of the death of the decedent”); McGranahan v. McGough, 249 Kan. 328 , 820 P.2d 403, 411 (1991) (“Because the employer has paid nothing to the injured worker for loss of services [consortium], any recovery as a result of a loss of services action against | 1 | 1 |
Huber v. Hoveygreen1 sentence1997Huber v. Hovey, 501 N.W.2d 53, 57 (Iowa 1993). | 1 | 1 |
Schrock v. Shoemakergreen2 sentences1997See Schrock v. Shoemaker, 159 Ill.2d 533 , 203 Ill.Dec. 787, 790 , 640 N.E.2d 937, 940 (1994) (not aKowing a workers’ compensation Ken to attach to proceeds of a loss-of-consortium claim because the consortium claim “is an independent action brought in the surviving spouse’s name to recover for injuries she suffered in her own right as a result of the death of the decedent”); McGranahan v. McGough, 249 Kan. 328 , 820 P.2d 403, 411 (1991) (“Because the employer has paid nothing to the injured worker for loss of services [consortium], any recovery as a result of a loss of services action against 1997See Schrock v. Shoemaker, 159 Ill.2d 533 , 203 Ill.Dec. 787, 790 , 640 N.E.2d 937, 940 (1994) (not aKowing a workers’ compensation Ken to attach to proceeds of a loss-of-consortium claim because the consortium claim “is an independent action brought in the surviving spouse’s name to recover for injuries she suffered in her own right as a result of the death of the decedent”); McGranahan v. McGough, 249 Kan. 328 , 820 P.2d 403, 411 (1991) (“Because the employer has paid nothing to the injured worker for loss of services [consortium], any recovery as a result of a loss of services action against | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Wellman Dynamics Corp.green1 sentence1996See Miller v. Wellman Dynamics Corp., 419 N.W.2d 380, 384 (Iowa 1988) (holding a parent’s claim for loss of consortium of an adult child is not recognized at common law, by statute, or by rule). | 1 | 1 |
Kulish v. West Side Unlimited Corp.green1 sentence1996Kulish v. West Side Unlimited Corp., 545 N.W.2d 860, 862 (Iowa 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Van Ellen v. Meyergreen1 sentence1995See Ohlen v. Harriman, 296 N.W.2d 794, 795-96 (Iowa 1980); Michael, 292 N.W.2d at 420 ; Bowman v. Bennett, 250 N.W.2d 47, 50 (Iowa 1977); and Van Ellen v. Meyer, 207 N.W.2d 552, 554 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
Ohlen v. Harrimangreen1 sentence1995See Ohlen v. Harriman, 296 N.W.2d 794, 795-96 (Iowa 1980); Michael, 292 N.W.2d at 420 ; Bowman v. Bennett, 250 N.W.2d 47, 50 (Iowa 1977); and Van Ellen v. Meyer, 207 N.W.2d 552, 554 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.green1 sentence1995Beeck v. Aquaslide ’N’ Dive Corp., 350 N.W.2d 149, 167 (Iowa 1984); Michael v. Harrison County Rural Elec. | 1 | 1 |
Tomlinson v. Siehlgreen2 sentences1990Tomlinson v. Siehl, 459 S.W.2d 166, 168 (Ky.1970); Box v. Walker, 453 A.2d 1181, 1183 (Me.1983). 1990Tomlinson v. Siehl, 459 S.W.2d 166, 168 (Ky.1970); Box v. Walker, 453 A.2d 1181, 1183 (Me.1983). | 1 | 1 |
Box v. Walkergreen2 sentences1990Tomlinson v. Siehl, 459 S.W.2d 166, 168 (Ky.1970); Box v. Walker, 453 A.2d 1181, 1183 (Me.1983). 1990Tomlinson v. Siehl, 459 S.W.2d 166, 168 (Ky.1970); Box v. Walker, 453 A.2d 1181, 1183 (Me.1983). | 1 | 1 |
Feltch v. General Rental Co.green2 sentences1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal.App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). 1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal.App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Christie v. Maxwellgreen2 sentences1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal.App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). 1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal.App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Reese v. Werts Corp.green2 sentences1988See Peterson v. Pittman, 391 N.W. 2d 235, 238 (Iowa 1986); Reese v. Werts Corp., 379 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Iowa 1985). 1988See Peterson v. Pittman, 391 N.W. 2d 235, 238 (Iowa 1986); Reese v. Werts Corp., 379 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Iowa 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Ziegler v. United States Gypsum Companygreen | 1 | 1 |
Lantis v. Condongreen2 sentences1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal.App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). 1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal.App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Grover P. MacOn v. Seaward Construction Company, Inc.green2 sentences1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal. App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); *102 Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). 1988Other comparative fault jurisdictions which have refused to characterize a loss of consortium action as derivative include Macon v. Seaward Construction Co., 555 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1977) (applying New Hampshire law); Lantis v. Condon, 95 Cal.App.3d 152, 157 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 22, 24 (1979); Feltch v. General Rental Co., 383 Mass. 603, 608 , 421 N.E.2d 67, 70-71 (1981); Christie v. Maxwell, 40 Wash.App. 40, 44 , 696 P.2d 1256, 1258 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Peterson v. Pittmangreen2 sentences1988See Peterson v. Pittman, 391 N.W. 2d 235, 238 (Iowa 1986); Reese v. Werts Corp., 379 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Iowa 1985). 1988See Peterson v. Pittman, 391 N.W. 2d 235, 238 (Iowa 1986); Reese v. Werts Corp., 379 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Iowa 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Wilson v. Iowa Power & Light Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Lampe v. Lagomarcino-Grupe Companygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schwennen v. Abell
green
2 sentences1993First, he claims that Schwennen v. Abell, 430 N.W.2d 98 (Iowa 1988), and Nichols v. Schweitzer, 472 N.W.2d 266 (Iowa 1991), stand for the proposition that there can be no apportionment of fault on a loss of consortium claim. 1992Schwennen, 430 N.W.2d at 104 . | 2 | 1992–1993 |
Voss v. State, Iowa Department of Transportation
green
1 sentence2024As the Voss court explained, the mother “had no claim as the parent of the decedent because Iowa has not recognized a loss of consortium claim by a parent for the death of an adult child.” Id. at 881 n.3. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Yulin Li ex rel. Lee v. Rizzio
green
1 sentence2017Id. at 359–60. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Nichols v. Schweitzer
green
1 sentence1993First, he claims that Schwennen v. Abell, 430 N.W.2d 98 (Iowa 1988), and Nichols v. Schweitzer, 472 N.W.2d 266 (Iowa 1991), stand for the proposition that there can be no apportionment of fault on a loss of consortium claim. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Hinners v. Pekin Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1991For example, in Hinners v. Pekin Insurance Co., 431 N.W.2d 345 (Iowa 1988), we held that the phrase included a loss of consortium claim by a person covered by the policy but not injured in the accident. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Taylor green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.