Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
69 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Finley v. Bassgreen2 sentences1998O'Riley v. City of Shreveport, 30,107 (La.App.2d Cir.1/23/98), 706 So.2d 213 ; Finley v. Bass, 478 So.2d 608, 614 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985). 1998Finley v. Bass, 478 So.2d 608, 614 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985). | 4 | 6 |
Vaccaro v. Sports & Imports, Inc.green2 sentences1994Vaccaro v. Sports & Imports, Inc., 539 So.2d 989, 993 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989), writs denied 541 So.2d 1391 and 1392 (La.1989). 1993The elements of a loss of consortium claim are “loss of: love and affection, society and companionship, sexual relations, right of performance of material services, right of support, aid and assistance, and lastly felicity.” Vaccaro v. Smith & Imports, Inc., 539 So.2d 989, 993 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989), writs denied 541 So.2d 1391 and 1392 (La.1989). | 3 | 3 |
Lonthier v. Northwest Ins. Co.green2 sentences1991Co., 497 So.2d 774, 775 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), we stated: `The compensable elements of damage in a loss of consortium claim are loss of society, sex, and service and support. 1989In Lonthier v. Northwest Insurance Company, 497 So.2d 774, 775-776 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), appears the following: The compensable elements of damage in a loss of consortium claim are loss of society, sex, and service and support. | 3 | 3 |
Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.green2 sentences2004The trial court gave the following reasons for his judgments: In Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass[Fiberglas] Corp., 444 So.2d 788 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984) the court held that a cause of action for loss of consortium does not arise until the plaintiff actually suffers the loss. 2003In a similar asbestos exposure case where the characteristics of a loss of consortium claim were analyzed, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that "a cause of action arises when negligent or tortious conduct causes injury." Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788, 790 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984); see also McDuffie v. ACandS, Inc., 00-2745 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/14/01) ; 781 So.2d 623 . | 2 | 3 |
Carroll v. State Farm Ins. Co.green2 sentences2000In Carroll v. State Farm Insurance Company, 519 So.2d 265, 266-267 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 520 So.2d 756 (La.1988), the Fifth Circuit found no public policy prohibition against an insurer limiting recovery for a loss of consortium claim to the same "per person" limit from which the primary tort victim recovered. 1992Accord Carroll v. State Farm Insurance Company, 519 So.2d 265 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 520 So.2d 756 (La.1988) (holding that a spouse's loss of consortium claim did not constitute a separate "bodily injury" under the terms of policy providing uninsured motorist coverage). | 2 | 2 |
Doe v. Roman Catholic Churchgreen2 sentences2000Doe v. Roman Catholic Church for Archdiocese of New Orleans, 615 So.2d 410, 417 (La.App. 4 Cir.1993), writ denied. 2000Doe v. Roman Catholic Church for Archdiocese of New Orleans, 615 So.2d 410, 417 (La.App. 4 Cir.), writs denied, 618 So.2d 412 and 413 (La.1993). | 2 | 2 |
McGee v. AC AND S, INC.green2 sentences2021“In addition, a wrongful death claim is like a loss of consortium claim insofar as it clearly compensates the beneficiaries for their own injuries, separate and distinct from the primary victim’s injuries.” Id. (citing McGee, 933 So.2d at 780 ) (internal citation omitted). 2021“In addition, a wrongful death claim is like a loss of consortium claim insofar as it clearly compensates the beneficiaries for their own injuries, separate and distinct from the primary victim’s injuries.” Id. (citing McGee, 933 So.2d at 780 ) (internal citation omitted). | 1 | 4 |
McDuffie v. ACandS, Inc.green2 sentences2004Co., 464 So.2d 979 (La.App. 4 Cir.1985); McDuffie v. ACandS, Inc., 00-2745 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/14/01) , 781 So.2d 623 ; but see Ferguson v. Burkett, 454 So.2d 413 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1984) (refusing to allow a loss of consortium claim because the acts or negligence of defendants occurred prior to the 1982 amendment). 2003In a similar asbestos exposure case where the characteristics of a loss of consortium claim were analyzed, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that "a cause of action arises when negligent or tortious conduct causes injury." Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788, 790 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984); see also McDuffie v. ACandS, Inc., 00-2745 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/14/01) ; 781 So.2d 623 . | 1 | 3 |
Shepard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.green2 sentences1993Co., 545 So.2d 624 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989), writs denied, 550 So.2d 627 , 628 (La.1989), the court found that the parents' loss of consortium claim was derived from their son's injuries. 1992In Shepard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 545 So.2d 624 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writs denied, 550 So.2d 627 , 628 (La.1989), the court ruled that a loss of consortium claim does fall under the term "bodily injury" in an insurance policy. | 1 | 3 |
Carroll v. State Farm Ins. Co.green2 sentences2000In Carroll v. State Farm Insurance Company, 519 So.2d 265, 266-267 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 520 So.2d 756 (La.1988), the Fifth Circuit found no public policy prohibition against an insurer limiting recovery for a loss of consortium claim to the same "per person" limit from which the primary tort victim recovered. 1992Accord Carroll v. State Farm Insurance Company, 519 So.2d 265 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 520 So.2d 756 (La.1988) (holding that a spouse's loss of consortium claim did not constitute a separate "bodily injury" under the terms of policy providing uninsured motorist coverage). | 1 | 2 |
| Raziano v. Lincoln Property Co.green | 1 | 2 |
| Higley v. Kramergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Ferguson v. Burkettgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Seagers v. Pailet
green
2 sentences2015Gunn v. Robertson, 01-347 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/01) , 801 So.2d 555, 565 ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/10/95) , 656 So.2d 700 . 2004Gunn v. Robertson, 01-347 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/01) , 801 So.2d 555, 565 ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/10/95) , 656 So.2d 700 . | 6 | 1998–2015 |
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences2014McGee, 933 So.2d at 780 (citing Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719 (La.12/3/03), 864 So.2d 117, 126 ). 2006While we acknowledge the decision in Ferrell , we also note that it was explained by the supreme court in Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-0179, 030-993, 03-1002, pp. 9-10 (La. 12/3/03), 864 So.2d 117, 125-26 , as follows: In Ferrell , we were interpreting the single person policy limits of an insurance policy and held that, because the loss of consortium claim was "derivative of the primary victim's injury," it was restricted to the single person policy limits of the defendant's policy. | 4 | 2006–2014 |
Gunn v. Robertson
green
2 sentences2015Gunn v. Robertson, 01-347 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/01) , 801 So.2d 555, 565 ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/10/95) , 656 So.2d 700 . 2004Gunn v. Robertson, 01-347 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/14/01) , 801 So.2d 555, 565 ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/10/95) , 656 So.2d 700 . | 3 | 2003–2015 |
Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2007Co., 96-3028 (La.7/1/97), 696 So.2d 569 ); Shepard v. State Farm Mut. 2005In Ferrell v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., 96-3028 (La.7/1/97), 696 So.2d 569 , the supreme court was asked to decide whether an insurer was liable for a spouse’s loss of consortium claim out of the per accident bodily injury limits of its policy, or whether the loss of consortium claim was derivative of her husband’s injuries and therefore must be satisfied out of the per person bodily injury limits of the policy. | 3 | 2005–2007 |
Vidrine v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences1994La.C.C. art. 2315(B); Vidrine v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 528 So.2d 765 (La.App. 3d Cir.1988), writ denied, 532 So.2d 156 (La.1988). 1990Co., 528 So.2d 765 (La.App. 3 Cir.1988), writ den., 532 So.2d 156 (La.1988), we stated: "`The compensable elements of damage in a loss of consortium claim are loss of society, sex, and service and support. | 3 | 1990–1994 |
Aldredge v. Whitney
green
2 sentences1994Id. 1992In Aldredge v. Whitney, 591 So.2d 1201 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991), the court was asked to decide whether the settlement and release of the insurer by the primary victim injured in an automobile accident extinguished the loss of consortium claim by the claimant (who was the victim's boyfriend at the time of the accident and who later became her husband) against that insurer. | 3 | 1992–1994 |
Albin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences1994Contrarily, State Farm relies on Albin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 498 So.2d 171 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 498 So.2d 1088 (La.1986), in which the first circuit, in interpreting a "bodily injury" definition exactly like the one in this case, held the injuries suffered in a loss of consortium claim did not constitute a "bodily injury" under the policy. 1989Co., 498 So.2d 171 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986), the court found that a loss of consortium claim by a wife was really a claim for "damages due to bodily injury" of her husband under the uninsured motorist policy. | 3 | 1989–1994 |
Vidrine v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences1994La.C.C. art. 2315(B); Vidrine v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 528 So.2d 765 (La.App. 3d Cir.1988), writ denied, 532 So.2d 156 (La.1988). 1990Co., 528 So.2d 765 (La.App. 3 Cir.1988), writ den., 532 So.2d 156 (La.1988), we stated: "`The compensable elements of damage in a loss of consortium claim are loss of society, sex, and service and support. | 3 | 1990–1994 |
State v. Humphrey
green
2 sentences1993Co., 545 So.2d 624 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989), writs denied, 550 So.2d 627 , 628 (La.1989), the court found that the parents' loss of consortium claim was derived from their son's injuries. 1992In Shepard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 545 So.2d 624 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writs denied, 550 So.2d 627 , 628 (La.1989), the court ruled that a loss of consortium claim does fall under the term "bodily injury" in an insurance policy. | 3 | 1992–1994 |
Vaccaro v. Sports & Imports, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1994Vaccaro v. Sports & Imports, Inc., 539 So.2d 989, 993 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989), writs denied 541 So.2d 1391 and 1392 (La.1989). 1993The elements of a loss of consortium claim are “loss of: love and affection, society and companionship, sexual relations, right of performance of material services, right of support, aid and assistance, and lastly felicity.” Vaccaro v. Smith & Imports, Inc., 539 So.2d 989, 993 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989), writs denied 541 So.2d 1391 and 1392 (La.1989). | 3 | 1992–1994 |
Simpson v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT
green
2 sentences2011Spears, supra; Simpson v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 636 So.2d 608 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-0042, 94-1005 (La.05/06/94), 637 So.2d 471 , 472. |aiThus, we must be careful to differentiate between that which is recoverable as an element of the consortium claim and that which is not recoverable absent the existence of a cause of action for individual mental distress under La.Civ.Code art. *555 2315.6 and the holding in Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hospital, 556 So.2d 559 (La.1990). 1999Spears, supra; Simpson v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 636 So.2d 608 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1993), writs denied, 94-0042, 94-1005 (La.05/06/94), 637 So.2d 471 , 472. | 2 | 1999–2011 |
Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp.
green
2 sentences2011Spears, supra; Simpson v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 636 So.2d 608 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-0042, 94-1005 (La.05/06/94), 637 So.2d 471 , 472. |aiThus, we must be careful to differentiate between that which is recoverable as an element of the consortium claim and that which is not recoverable absent the existence of a cause of action for individual mental distress under La.Civ.Code art. *555 2315.6 and the holding in Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hospital, 556 So.2d 559 (La.1990). 1994We note, however, that in Lejeune, 556 So.2d at 568-69 , this court found the defendant hospital owed an independent duty to protect the plaintiff from mental pain and anguish occasioned by the negligent infliction of injury to the plaintiff's husband. [12] State Farm admits the definition of "bodily injury" would provide coverage not only for Stephen Crabtree's physical injuries but also for any emotional problems he suffered resulting from his injuries. [13] That particular policy defined "bodily injury" as "bodily injury, sickness or disease sustained by any person." [14] We note that the L | 2 | 1994–2011 |
Simpson v. State Through DOTD
green
2 sentences2011Spears, supra; Simpson v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 636 So.2d 608 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-0042, 94-1005 (La.05/06/94), 637 So.2d 471 , 472. |aiThus, we must be careful to differentiate between that which is recoverable as an element of the consortium claim and that which is not recoverable absent the existence of a cause of action for individual mental distress under La.Civ.Code art. *555 2315.6 and the holding in Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hospital, 556 So.2d 559 (La.1990). 1999Spears, supra; Simpson v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 636 So.2d 608 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1993), writs denied, 94-0042, 94-1005 (La.05/06/94), 637 So.2d 471 , 472. | 2 | 1999–2011 |
Kent v. Concordia Electric Co-op, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2010Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805, p. 23 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99), 738 So.2d 1105, 1122 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1120 . 2002Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99); 738 So.2d 1105 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99); 747 So.2d 1120 . | 2 | 2002–2010 |
Holmes v. Daybrook Fisheries, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2010Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805, p. 23 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99), 738 So.2d 1105, 1122 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1120 . 2002Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99); 738 So.2d 1105 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99); 747 So.2d 1120 . | 2 | 2002–2010 |
Broussard v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2010Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805, p. 23 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99), 738 So.2d 1105, 1122 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1120 . 2002Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99); 738 So.2d 1105 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99); 747 So.2d 1120 . | 2 | 2002–2010 |
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity
green
2 sentences2010Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805, p. 23 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99), 738 So.2d 1105, 1122 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99), 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99), 747 So.2d 1120 . 2002Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, 31,805 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/7/99); 738 So.2d 1105 , writs denied, 99-1607 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 634 , 99-1622 (La.9/24/99); 749 So.2d 635 , 99-1668 (La.9/24/99); 747 So.2d 1120 . | 2 | 2002–2010 |
Giroir v. SOUTH LA. MEDICAL CTR., ETC.
green
2 sentences2004We stated as follows: In Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 475 So.2d 1040 (La.1985), the Louisiana Supreme Court established a four part [sic] test for determining whether | lfian amended petition adding a new plaintiff relates back under La. 1992In both cases we applied the test enunciated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 475 So.2d 1040 (La.1985) to determine whether an amended petition related back to the date of the filing of the original petition. | 2 | 1992–2004 |
O'RILEY v. City of Shreveport
green
2 sentences2000McCrocklin, supra ; O'Riley v. City of Shreveport, 30,107 (La.App.2d Cir.1/23/98), 706 So.2d 213 , writ denied, 98-0752 (La.5/1/98), 718 So.2d 418 . 1998O'Riley v. City of Shreveport, 30,107 (La.App.2d Cir.1/23/98), 706 So.2d 213 ; Finley v. Bass, 478 So.2d 608, 614 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985). | 2 | 1998–2000 |
Albin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences1994Contrarily, State Farm relies on Albin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 498 So.2d 171 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 498 So.2d 1088 (La.1986), in which the first circuit, in interpreting a "bodily injury" definition exactly like the one in this case, held the injuries suffered in a loss of consortium claim did not constitute a "bodily injury" under the policy. 1992For instance, in Albin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 498 So.2d 171 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 498 So.2d 1088 (La.1986), Mr. Albin was injured in an automobile accident by the negligence of State Farm's insured. | 2 | 1992–1994 |
| Broussard v. Romero neutral | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Lemoine v. Mike Munna, L.L.C. green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Ritter v. Exxon Mobile Corp. green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Broussard v. Razden green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Kilpatrick v. ALLIANCE CASUALTY AND REINSURANCE COMPANY green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Kilpatrick v. Alliance Cas. & Reinsurance Co. green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Dickerson v. Lafferty neutral | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Thomas v. Thomas neutral | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Roberts v. State green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Roberts v. State green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Joseph v. Entergy green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Landgraf v. USI Film Products green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Walls v. American Optical Corp. green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Abadie v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Phillips v. Palumbo green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| Gunn v. Robertson neutral | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| Blue/Gray Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Inland Bay Drilling & Workover, Inc. green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.