21 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Conradygreen2 sentences2022Conrady , 2012 OK 29 State ex rel. 2022Conrady , 2012 OK 29 State ex rel. | 2 | 5 |
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GIVENSgreen2 sentences2017Givens, 2014 OK 103 , ¶ 18, 343 P.3d at 218 , Conrady, 2012 OK 29, ¶ 16 , 275 P.3d at 139 . 2017Givens, 2014 OK 103 , ¶ 18, 343 P.3d at 218 , Conrady, 2012 OK 29, ¶ 16 , 275 P.3d at 139 . | 2 | 4 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Thomasgreen1 sentence1996Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Thomas, 886 P.2d 477, 479 (Okla.1994). | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Caldwellgreen2 sentences1995Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Caldwell, 880 P.2d 349, 354 (Okla.1994) was charged with two counts of misconduct. 1995Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Caldwell, 880 P.2d 349, 354 (Okla. 1994) was charged with two counts of misconduct. | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. Johnstongreen1 sentence1994Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Johnston, 863 P.2d 1136, 1146 (Okla.1993), the respondent was found guilty, in a single court, of commingling and conversion of a client’s funds, making a false statement to *1287 the trial judge, failing to give competent representation, failing to act promptly and failing to communicate with his client. | 1 | 1 |
Street v. Sugermangreen1 sentence1984In finding that the attorneys, as well as their professional corporation, must forfeit the excessive fee, we agree with the court in Street v. Sugerman, 202 So.2d 749, 751 (Fla.1967), which stated: “The privilege of incorporation was most definitely not created or extended in order that those availing themselves of the bene *68 fits could be cloaked with an immunity inimical to legal order and public interest.” One of the most important public interests of the courts of this state is the integrity of the bar and regulation of its members. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Beasley
green
2 sentences2008Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Beasley, 2006 OK 49, ¶ 34 , 142 P.3d 410 2008Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Beasley, 2006 OK 49, ¶ 34 , 142 P.3d 410 | 3 | 2007–2008 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Meek
green
2 sentences2008Meek, supra, 895 P.2d at 700 . 2003Meek, supra, 895 P.2d at 700 . | 3 | 2002–2008 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Prather
green
2 sentences2018A public censure for Respondent in this matter is appropriate given the goal of our disciplinary process is not "punishment but to preserve the integrity of the bar and courts to protect the public." Prather , 1996 OK 87 , ¶ 19, 925 P.2d at 30 -31 . ¶19 The evidence reflects that the life events that occurred during this difficult time in Respondent's life left her depressed and unable to appropriately respond. 2018A public censure for Respondent in this matter is appropriate given the goal of our disciplinary process is not "punishment but to preserve the integrity of the bar and courts to protect the public." Prather , 1996 OK 87 , ¶ 19, 925 P.2d at 30 -31 . ¶19 The evidence reflects that the life events that occurred during this difficult time in Respondent's life left her depressed and unable to appropriately respond. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
PACK v. STATE
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Wilcox
green
2 sentences2016Bar Ass'n v. Wilcox , 2009 OK 81, ¶¶22-28 , 227 P.3d 642 (attorney held to have violated Rule 5.2 despite his assertions that he did not receive the first two letters from the OBA). 11 This Court has previously ordered supervision as part of discipline in order to correct problems in an attorney's practice, so as to preserve the integrity of the bar and courts and to protect the public. 2016Bar Ass'n v. Wilcox , 2009 OK 81, ¶¶22-28 , 227 P.3d 642 (attorney held to have violated Rule 5.2 despite his assertions that he did not receive the first two letters from the OBA). 11 This Court has previously ordered supervision as part of discipline in order to correct problems in an attorney's practice, so as to preserve the integrity of the bar and courts and to protect the public. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Shofner
green
2 sentences2014State ex rel Oklahoma Bar Association v. Shofner , 2002 OK 84 , ¶¶ 5 and 13, 60 P.3d 1024, 1027-29 . 2014State ex rel Oklahoma Bar Association v. Shofner , 2002 OK 84 , ¶¶ 5 and 13, 60 P.3d 1024, 1027-29 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.