Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Weyshamgreen2 sentences2005In re: Brigandi, 02-2873 (La.4/9/03), 843 So.2d 1083 (citing Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Weysham, 307 So.2d 336 (La.1975)). 2003In Count II, respondent’s actions may have caused no palpable harm to any clients, but violated the general duty imposed upon attorneys “to uphold the integrity of the bar.” Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Weysham, 307 So.2d 336 (La.1975). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Michelgreen1 sentence1996In State v. Michel, 422 So.2d 1115, 1120-1121 (La.1982), during rebuttal the prosecutor, "after referring to defense counsel's statement indicating that he (defense counsel) knew that defendant was not guilty, stated, `If he knows ... he should have taken the witness stand.'" The Louisiana Supreme Court noted: While the prosecutor's remarks referring to the integrity of defense counsel were inappropriate and bordered on reversible error, we do not consider that the jury was influenced by them or that they contributed to the verdict. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Brigandi
green
1 sentence2005In re: Brigandi, 02-2873 (La.4/9/03), 843 So.2d 1083 (citing Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Weysham, 307 So.2d 336 (La.1975)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Peyton v. Peyton
green
1 sentence1985Peyton v. Peyton, 457 So.2d 321 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1984). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
In Re Novo
green
2 sentences1975Louisiana State Bar Association v. Blum, 256 La. 530 , 237 So.2d 366 (1970); In re Novo, 200 La. 833 , 9 So.2d 201 (1942). 1975Louisiana State Bar Association v. Blum, 256 La. 530 , 237 So.2d 366 (1970); In re Novo, 200 La. 833 , 9 So.2d 201 (1942). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Blum
neutral
2 sentences1975Louisiana State Bar Association v. Blum, 256 La. 530 , 237 So.2d 366 (1970); In re Novo, 200 La. 833 , 9 So.2d 201 (1942). 1975Louisiana State Bar Association v. Blum, 256 La. 530 , 237 So.2d 366 (1970); In re Novo, 200 La. 833 , 9 So.2d 201 (1942). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.