integrity claim in Indiana

13 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Miller v. Stategreen ind · 1993 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1999–2008 2 sentences 2008Our Court disapproved of similar statements by a prosecutor in Miller v. State, 623 N.E.2d 403, 407 (Ind.1993). 1999Our Court disapproved of similar statements by a prosecutor in Miller v. State, 623 N.E.2d 403, 407 (Ind.1993).	2	2
Marcum v. Stategreen ind · 2000 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2019 2 sentences 2019He did not, however, request an admonishment nor move for a mistrial. [14] We acknowledge that the prosecutor’s comments here “attack the integrity of defense counsel by suggesting that [s]he is trying to mislead the jury.” Marcum v. State, 725 N.E.2d 852, 859 (Ind. 2000), reh’g denied. 2013Id. 3 Likewise, here the prosecutor’s comments that defense counsel presented arguments that allowed guilty people to go free and that defense counsel’s argument was a trick suggest that defense counsel is deceptive and therefore cannot be trusted.	1	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (17)

Case	Cited	Years
Bardonner v. State green indctapp · 1992 2 sentences 2008The Court of Appeals held these statements to be misconduct that placed the defendant in grave peril, stating, “we cannot say that the prosecutor’s comments — attacking the integrity of defense counsel by indicating that defense counsel would do anything to hide the truth, including impeaching testimony of truthful witnesses — did not affect the jurors’ verdict.” Id. at 1362 . 1999The Court of Appeals held these statements to be misconduct that placed the defendant in grave peril, stating, “we cannot say that the prosecutor’s comments— attacking the integrity of defense counsel by indicating that defense counsel would do anything to hide the truth, including impeaching testimony of truthful witnesses — did not affect the jurors’ verdict.” Id. at 1362 .	2	1999–2008
Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. Mayberry green indctapp · 2006 1 sentence 2009It is well settled that appellate courts possess the "inherent power to reconsider an order or ruling until an opinion has been certified." Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. Mayberry, 854 N.E.2d 355 , 360 n. 4 (Ind.Ct.App.2006); see also Ind. Appellate Rule 66(C)(10) (stating that appellate courts may grant "appropriate relief" "with respect to some or all of the parties or issues, in whole or in part").	1	2009–2009
Kenn Air Corp. v. GAINESVILLE-ALACHUA CTY. REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTH. green fladistctapp · 1992 1 sentence 2000Id. at 1223 .	1	2000–2000
Matter of Brooks green ind · 1998 1 sentence 2000Matter of Brooks, 694 N.E.2d 724 (Ind.1998).	1	2000–2000
Matter of Kern green ind · 1990 1 sentence 1993Kern, supra, at 456 .	1	1993–1993
Matter of Briggs neutral ind · 1987 1 sentence 1988In re Briggs (1987) Ind., 502 N.E.2d 890 ; In re Stanton (1986) Ind., 492 N.E.2d 1056 ; In re Duffy (1985) Ind., 482 N.E.2d 1137 .	1	1988–1988
Matter of Duffy neutral ind · 1985 1 sentence 1988In re Briggs (1987) Ind., 502 N.E.2d 890 ; In re Stanton (1986) Ind., 492 N.E.2d 1056 ; In re Duffy (1985) Ind., 482 N.E.2d 1137 .	1	1988–1988
Matter of Stanton green ind · 1986 1 sentence 1988In re Briggs (1987) Ind., 502 N.E.2d 890 ; In re Stanton (1986) Ind., 492 N.E.2d 1056 ; In re Duffy (1985) Ind., 482 N.E.2d 1137 .	1	1988–1988
Matter of Noel green ind · 1976 2 sentences 1977In re Murray, supra; In re Wood, supra; In re Noel, (1976) 265 Ind. 98 , 350 N.E.2d 623 . 1977In re Murray, supra; In re Wood, supra; In re Noel, (1976) 265 Ind. 98 , 350 N.E.2d 623 .	1	1977–1977
Teegarden v. Ristine green indctapp · 1914 2 sentences 1947In the case of Teegarden v. Ristine (1914), 57 Ind. App. 158, 164 , 106 N. E. 641 , this court said: Where the “confidential relation is shown to exist and it is claimed that the party occupying the superior position has dealt with the one to whom he owes a duty arising out of such relation, and has gained a substantial advantage thereby, the burden is upon the one who holds such superior position of establishing that he acted in perfect good faith, gave the other party full and accurate information possessed by him, took no advantage of his knowledge, or influence over the other party, and th 1947In the case of Teegarden v. Ristine (1914), 57 Ind. App. 158, 164 , 106 N. E. 641 , this court said: Where the “confidential relation is shown to exist and it is claimed that the party occupying the superior position has dealt with the one to whom he owes a duty arising out of such relation, and has gained a substantial advantage thereby, the burden is upon the one who holds such superior position of establishing that he acted in perfect good faith, gave the other party full and accurate information possessed by him, took no advantage of his knowledge, or influence over the other party, and th	1	1947–1947
Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Hoggatt neutral indctapp · 1905 1 sentence 1934“The confidential relation and the transaction having been shown, the burden of proof is upon the person occupying the superior position to establish the integrity of his claim.” Huffman v. Huffman (1905), 35 Ind. App. 643 , 73 N. E. 1096 ; McCord v. Bright (1909), 44 Ind. App. 275 , 87 N. E. 654 ; Firebaugh v. Trough (1914), 57 Ind. App. 421 , 107 N. E. 301 .	1	1934–1934
Huffman v. Huffman neutral indctapp · 1905 1 sentence 1934“The confidential relation and the transaction having been shown, the burden of proof is upon the person occupying the superior position to establish the integrity of his claim.” Huffman v. Huffman (1905), 35 Ind. App. 643 , 73 N. E. 1096 ; McCord v. Bright (1909), 44 Ind. App. 275 , 87 N. E. 654 ; Firebaugh v. Trough (1914), 57 Ind. App. 421 , 107 N. E. 301 .	1	1934–1934
Firebaugh v. Trough green indctapp · 1914 2 sentences 1934“The confidential relation and the transaction having been shown, the burden of proof is upon the person occupying the superior position to establish the integrity of his claim.” Huffman v. Huffman (1905), 35 Ind. App. 643 , 73 N. E. 1096 ; McCord v. Bright (1909), 44 Ind. App. 275 , 87 N. E. 654 ; Firebaugh v. Trough (1914), 57 Ind. App. 421 , 107 N. E. 301 . 1934“The confidential relation and the transaction having been shown, the burden of proof is upon the person occupying the superior position to establish the integrity of his claim.” Huffman v. Huffman (1905), 35 Ind. App. 643 , 73 N. E. 1096 ; McCord v. Bright (1909), 44 Ind. App. 275 , 87 N. E. 654 ; Firebaugh v. Trough (1914), 57 Ind. App. 421 , 107 N. E. 301 .	1	1934–1934
McCord v. Bright green indctapp · 1909 2 sentences 1934“The confidential relation and the transaction having been shown, the burden of proof is upon the person occupying the superior position to establish the integrity of his claim.” Huffman v. Huffman (1905), 35 Ind. App. 643 , 73 N. E. 1096 ; McCord v. Bright (1909), 44 Ind. App. 275 , 87 N. E. 654 ; Firebaugh v. Trough (1914), 57 Ind. App. 421 , 107 N. E. 301 . 1934“The confidential relation and the transaction having been shown, the burden of proof is upon the person occupying the superior position to establish the integrity of his claim.” Huffman v. Huffman (1905), 35 Ind. App. 643 , 73 N. E. 1096 ; McCord v. Bright (1909), 44 Ind. App. 275 , 87 N. E. 654 ; Firebaugh v. Trough (1914), 57 Ind. App. 421 , 107 N. E. 301 .	1	1934–1934
Rochester v. Levering green ind · 1886 1 sentence 1905Rochester v. Levering (1886), 104 Ind. 562, 568 ; Wainwright v. Smith (1886), 106 Ind. 239, 242 ; French v. Cunningham (1898), 149 Ind. 632 ; 1 Perry, Trusts (5th ed.), §195. 5. .The relation existing between the parties hereto’ at the time appellant acquired title to the.real estate belonging to appellee was on© which requires the application of the doctrines above stated.	1	1905–1905
Wainwright v. Smith green ind · 1886 1 sentence 1905Rochester v. Levering (1886), 104 Ind. 562, 568 ; Wainwright v. Smith (1886), 106 Ind. 239, 242 ; French v. Cunningham (1898), 149 Ind. 632 ; 1 Perry, Trusts (5th ed.), §195. 5. .The relation existing between the parties hereto’ at the time appellant acquired title to the.real estate belonging to appellee was on© which requires the application of the doctrines above stated.	1	1905–1905
French v. Cunningham green ind · 1898 1 sentence 1905Rochester v. Levering (1886), 104 Ind. 562, 568 ; Wainwright v. Smith (1886), 106 Ind. 239, 242 ; French v. Cunningham (1898), 149 Ind. 632 ; 1 Perry, Trusts (5th ed.), §195. 5. .The relation existing between the parties hereto’ at the time appellant acquired title to the.real estate belonging to appellee was on© which requires the application of the doctrines above stated.	1	1905–1905

Where else courts name it

CA 204 (1957–2026) PA 64 (1930–2025) MD 51 (1971–2025) IL 47 (1976–2026) NJ 29 (1979–2026) OK 21 (1984–2022) MA 21 (1987–2025) NY 20 (1900–2024) TX 19 (1983–2025) DC 17 (1984–2022) IN 13 (1905–2019) AZ 11 (1989–2022) MN 10 (1980–2015) UT 9 (1999–2024) NC 7 (1908–2023) WY 7 (2014–2023) NV 7 (2001–2017) MO 6 (1973–2004) WA 6 (2015–2019) FL 6 (1992–2015) LA 6 (1975–2005) VA 5 (1991–2007) VT 5 (1853–2023) MI 5 (1928–1981) TN 5 (2020–2026) AR 5 (1993–2015) CT 5 (1881–2014) KS 4 (1965–2022) MS 4 (2008–2014) HI 4 (2008–2020) AL 3 (1920–2007) OR 3 (1992–2022) RI 2 (2011–2015) KY 2 (1975–2012) CO 2 (1959–1959) NH 2 (1985–1999) IA 2 (2017–2023) OH 2 (2000–2002) MT 2 (1978–1989) AK 2 (1974–1980) ME 2 (2008–2010) WI 2 (2017–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check