7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bargreen2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 | 3 | 4 |
In Re the Suspension of Clarkgreen2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2014ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE [17] The purpose of a state bar disciplinary procedure is to maintain "the integrity of the bar and to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute," In re Clark, 613 P.2d 1218, 1221 (Wyo.1980) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Walman, 280 Md. 453 , 374 A.2d 354, 361 (1977)), and to "protect the public and the administration of justice." Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson, 2009 WY 48, ¶ 17 , 205 P.3d 1008, 1015 (Wyo.2009). | 3 | 4 |
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Davidsongreen2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 | 3 | 4 |
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Stacy E. Casper, Wsb No. 6-3431green2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 | 1 | 3 |
Meyer v. Normangreen1 sentence2022As a result, this Court has “the power, the duty, and the corresponding jurisdiction to supervise the conduct of all Wyoming attorneys, each of whom is an officer of the court.” Meyer v. Norman, 780 P.2d 283, 288 (Wyo. 1989). [¶3] “The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedures are to maintain the integrity of the bar, to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute and to protect the public and the administration of justice.” Bd. of Pro. | 1 | 1 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Walmangreen2 sentences2014ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE [17] The purpose of a state bar disciplinary procedure is to maintain "the integrity of the bar and to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute," In re Clark, 613 P.2d 1218, 1221 (Wyo.1980) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Walman, 280 Md. 453 , 374 A.2d 354, 361 (1977)), and to "protect the public and the administration of justice." Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson, 2009 WY 48, ¶ 17 , 205 P.3d 1008, 1015 (Wyo.2009). 2014ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE [17] The purpose of a state bar disciplinary procedure is to maintain "the integrity of the bar and to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute," In re Clark, 613 P.2d 1218, 1221 (Wyo.1980) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Walman, 280 Md. 453 , 374 A.2d 354, 361 (1977)), and to "protect the public and the administration of justice." Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson, 2009 WY 48, ¶ 17 , 205 P.3d 1008, 1015 (Wyo.2009). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Becket Benedict Hinckley, Wsb 6-3434
green
2 sentences2023“The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedures are to maintain the integrity of the bar, to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute and to protect the public and the administration of justice.” Hinckley, 2022 WY 18, ¶ 3 , 503 P.3d at 593 (quoting Bd. of Pro. 2023“The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedures are to maintain the integrity of the bar, to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute and to protect the public and the administration of justice.” Hinckley, 2022 WY 18, ¶ 3 , 503 P.3d at 593 (quoting Bd. of Pro. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.