Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thorgersongreen2 sentences2018Thorgerson, 172 Wn.2d at 451 . 2015The Thorgerson court held improper a prosecutor’s argument that “ ‘ [t] he entire defense is si [e] ight of hand’ ” and “ ‘bogus’ ” on the ground that it impugned the integrity of defense counsel. 172 Wn.2d at 450-51 (second alteration in original). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Martingreen1 sentence2018See State v. Martin, 171 Wn.2d 521 , 252 P.3d 872 (2011). 7 No. 35070-3-III State v. Hubbard While the prosecutor’s tone was not entirely professional, Mr. Hubbard has not established a basis for reversing his conviction. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Martingreen1 sentence2018See State v. Martin, 171 Wn.2d 521 , 252 P.3d 872 (2011). 7 No. 35070-3-III State v. Hubbard While the prosecutor’s tone was not entirely professional, Mr. Hubbard has not established a basis for reversing his conviction. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gonzalesgreen1 sentence2015A closing argument may not draw the cloak of righteousness around the prosecutor in his personal status as government attorney and impugn[] the integrity of defense counsel." Id. at 283 ( quoting United States v. Frascone, 747 F. 2d 953 , 957 -58 ( 5th Cir. 1984)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. John Frascone and David Allen Burcky
green
2 sentences2019Here, unlike in Gonzales, the prosecutor did not seek “‘to draw the cloak of righteousness around [herself] in [her] personal status as government attorney and impugn[] the integrity of defense counsel.’” 111 Wn. App. at 283 (quoting United States v. Frascone, 747 F.2d 953 , 957- 58 (5th Cir. 1984)). 2015A closing argument may not draw the cloak of righteousness around the prosecutor in his personal status as government attorney and impugn[] the integrity of defense counsel." Id. at 283 ( quoting United States v. Frascone, 747 F. 2d 953 , 957 -58 ( 5th Cir. 1984)). | 2 | 2015–2019 |
State v. Gonzales
green
1 sentence2019Here, unlike in Gonzales, the prosecutor did not seek “‘to draw the cloak of righteousness around [herself] in [her] personal status as government attorney and impugn[] the integrity of defense counsel.’” 111 Wn. App. at 283 (quoting United States v. Frascone, 747 F.2d 953 , 957- 58 (5th Cir. 1984)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Lindsay
green
2 sentences2016Id.; State v. Lindsay, 180 Wn.2d 423, 431-32 , 326 P.3d 125 (2014). 2016Id.; State v. Lindsay, 180 Wn.2d 423, 431-32 , 326 P.3d 125 (2014). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.